Thursday, January 24, 2008

[danger day] moan, moan, moan

Would you buy a tin of baked beans labelled "fancy grade"? Seems a bit suss to me.

It started with a cancellation from my mate who always visits Thursday morning for a dose of my Higham Chunky Chicken Soup. Apparently there was total gridlock on the roads in the 48 hours of snow blizzards and drifts we've been having [and it's still going out there].

Then came two more cancellations and my chum told me all of his had cancelled today. Then our water went off completely. Not a drop. Then came the first internet problem. Then came the Fancy Grade baked beans episode [best left unexplained].

I also ran into a huge plot problem in Chapter 10 of the rewriting of Obsession and still haven't solved it.

Now the lovely and talented 18 and 19 year old sisters I've told you about before, who usually grace my humble home for a few hours on a Thursday evening - they've just phoned and cancelled. I'm not a Happy Higham.

Tomorrow will be better though - it just feels that way, you know and outside it's winter wonderland with snow on the windowsills and little birds perching here as well.

[danger femmes] the trick is to stay alive

Is this good or is this good?

Today, I found myself having a one sided conversation with my cat....I'm slowly cementing my place on Spinster Hill. She's about 10 now but she's still very lively. I'm beginning to believe that she will in fact live forever.

Which is incredibly reassuring. I actually don't know what I'd do without her.

Is this woman dangerous or is this woman dangerous? Don't you think different or dangerous women are more exciting? All right, they take you to the cleaners and in the end murder you [see my first novel] but what a way to go, eh? And the sex is incredible.

[intelligence] suicide pact


Click pic for larger image. H/T Wonkotsane and Witanagemot.

[water] big stakes being played for here



No one's disputing that water supplies worldwide are dwindling and the U.S. situation has been well documented. California has been one highly publicized area where a city like Los Angeles, for example, can provide water for one million but is expected to house over 20 million people by 2020. In drawing attention to the world situation, the World Water Council inadvertently chose the wrong verb:

Water should be recognized as a great priority. One of the main objectives of the World Water Council is to increase awareness of the water issue. Decision-makers at all levels must be implicated.

Implicated - yes, how true. Decision makers are indeed implicated in this. Here are four examples from the directly criminal to the criminal by non-actionable negligence:

1. Alberta Tar Sands

Tar sands consume three to six barrels of water per barrel of oil produced and the South Saskatchewan River, the Athabaska and surrounding wetlands are being dried up and poluted beyond redemption and for what?

2. Bottled water scam

The progressive enabling, through government negligence, of the corruption of water supplies, especially to developed countries has resulted in people being forced onto bottled supplies and the buying of filtration systems. This is a multi-billion dollar industry which only exists because of the state of tap water. A Canadian from Vancouver, [mark_in_bc], where water should surely not be a problem, commented:

I live in the center of British Columbia, Canada, surrounded by more fresh water than most people in the world could imagine. Despite this my community has been under a boil water advisory for almost 10 years. Bottle water in our home is a must even if it comes from a tap in some other town.

Fellow blogger The Dragonstar has just bought a new super-duper filtration system to cope with the perceived problem - see the picture below - and that's indicative of the situation.



3. Planned giving away of LA's water

Gaining control of a nation's or state's water supplies also gives you the power to distribute it to whom you will, for largesse, a point this linked article addresses.

4. Failure to act to develop desalination as a viable alternative while pouring money into programmes of destruction, such as MK Ultra, such that 6% of the C.I.A. budget for one calendar year was spent on discovering ways to mind control people, let alone the money wasted on HAARP and the like.

Why no massive R&D into desalination?

Desalination is a process that removes dissolved minerals (including but not limited to salt) from seawater, brackish water, or treated wastewater. A number of technologies have been developed for desalination, including reverse osmosis (RO), distillation, electrodialysis, and vacuum freezing. Two of these technologies, RO and distillation, are being considered by municipalities, water districts, and private companies for development of seawater desalination in California.

Sea Water Reverse Osmosis (SWRO) is a reverse osmosis desalination membrane process that has been commercially used since the early 1970s. It's a method of forcing water through membranes and while it is definitely energy intensive, it's not impossibly so - we're talking developed societies here who can achieve and afford these things when faced with the alternative..

At the macro level, countries like Israel have been using it for some time:

With a capacity of 320,000m3 per day, the plant produces around 13% of the country's domestic consumer demand – equivalent to 5–6% of Israel's total water needs – at one of the world's lowest ever prices for desalinated water.

And though expensive, as already admitted, it is possible, costing Israel around 53c per cubic metre on current technology.

At the micro-level, it's been in use on boats for years and many companies supply boat sized plants - even small yachts can afford these. Admittedly they are slow, relatively expensive and suitable mainly for long haul voyages but the bottom line is that they do work.

And they are becoming more and more viable:

"Until recently, seawater desalination was a very expensive water source solution," said Gary Crisp, an engineer for the Water Corporation of Western Australia. "In the last ten years, seawater reverse-osmosis has matured into a viable alternative to thermal desalination," Crisp says.

So the claim that the costs are insupportable is complete rubbish. If massive investment had been put into the technology in the first place, it would be just as cost competitive as, say, windfarms or nuclear technology - and then we could talk subsidies after that.

Major obstacle

The single greatest obstacle to reverse osmosis and indeed other desalination technologies is that if it succeeds, the bottom falls out of the multi-billion dollar water industry, the grip which governments are now attempting to get on the daily lives of people* is weakened immeasurably - we can live without fuel but not without water - and the ID in the wrist in exchange for food and water loses its meaning.

In that is the true criminality of what's been going on. If desalination succeeded, then the only way these people could still defeat it is to ensure that industrial pollution continued apace and that some sort of global conflagration plus acid rain would render even osmosified water non-potable.

We'll have to see who wins this one.

* See the comments sections, particular comments by Anonymous, on any political post on this blog for evidence of this.


Wednesday, January 23, 2008

[my struggle] to ruin europe

Jose Manuel Barroso has given details of what he has called a "detailed roadmap" in the struggle against climate change. He insisted nothing would be left undone and no opponent left hiding under a stone unturned.

Addressing business critics who have complained that the proposals might drive industry away from the European Union, the commission president said the package was "not in favour of the environment and against the economy. We don't want to export our jobs to other parts of the world," he said.

Maria Margarida Pinto Ribeiro de Sousa Uva and I understand that this is precisely what's going to happen at this grave economic juncture but we will press on regardless."

Jose added, in passable Merkelese: "Es ist mein kampf."

[wordless wednesday] courtesy workofthepoet

Click pic to enlarge [a little].

[eternal beauty] in praise of the older woman

As one knowledgeable gentleman put it:

They doubt themselves now, but they're more interesting and lovelier than ever. They've had their adventures, they have stories to tell. They're knowing, wry, and speak in husky cigarette voices. They get my jokes. They tango, foxtrot, and swing. They make me feel suave, sophisticated, just like they are. I don't get that from young women (Don't fret, young women, you have plenty going for you, and all I'm saying is the best might still be yet to come).

As another put it:

* An older woman can wear any hat she chooses and nobody will laugh. A younger woman wearing the same hat will always look like a lampshade in a brothel.

* An older woman will never wake you up in the middle of the night & ask you, "What are you thinking?" An older woman doesn't care what you think.

* Older women can run faster because they're always wearing sensible shoes.

* Older women are more honest. An older woman will tell you that you are an a--h-le if you're acting like one. A young woman will say nothing, just in case it means you might break up with her. An older woman puts herself on a pedestal.

* An older woman will never accuse you of "using her." She's using you.

* Older women take charge of the situation. An older woman will call you up and ask you for a date. A younger woman will wait forever, by the phone, for you to call...

* Older women know how to cook. Young women know how to dial Pizza Hut Take out.

* An older woman will never accuse you of stealing the best years of her youth because chances are someone else has stolen them first.

As I put it:

The trick in getting an older woman to look at you is to be ten years younger than you actually are and being prepared to switch to the role of mature escort and confidant at a moment's notice. The great advantage of the older man is that he is a natural rogue and women love bad boys.


[l'ancien sénateur] jette l'éponge

Just love the way the French put it:

Le républicain Fred Thompson jette l'éponge

I'd jette l'eponge too if I was trailing that far behind. The CFR will have to get themselves a new boy. Wonder how he feels too about being called "the ancient senator'.

[blizzard] when being snowed in is desirable


Dave was writing of the philosophy of snow over at his place:

It snowed today. The skies were overcast, the wind blustery, the air crisp against the cheeks. Reminiscent of the Michigan Winters of old, it was comforting, familiar. Being born here, it's difficult for me to imagine what life must be like where there are no seasons, no transitions.

Though his theme was different, still - snow really does transform the whole mood and adds a touch of the exotic. We had a blizzard which went all day yesterday and just looking out of the window down on it was really something. Add to that scene a beautiful half Slavic, half Eastern woman who's just trudged through the snowdrifts in her fur coat and hat and who greets you at the door with her French/Russian accent and it's like living on another planet.

I adore the snow, I adore exotic women and I don't want to be anywhere else at this point in life. If this isn't heaven on earth then what is?

Tuesday, January 22, 2008

[captcha] a bullet in your skull








Was there ever a device more designed to make you tear out your remaining hair and shoot the offending blogger than the insufferable, obnoxious, mental-health threatening captcha word verification atrocity?

I mean - zvwyoko - really and truly!! Do you really wish to spend the rest of your blogging days negotiating garbage like this?!! Bloggers want visitors and then put up these sorts of barriers and for what? So that we can sit there thinking, 'Now I wonder what words I can make out of this - I know - Yoko [as in ono, as in ononism].'

OK - for some mickey mouse providers like the execrable Typepad, maybe. But Google blogs do not need word verification in the least - there's an inbuilt system of protection.

Let's start up:

Bloggers Against The Gratuitous Use Of Word Verification In Google Blogs

A nice, short, catchy little name, don't you think?

[why not] they laughed at noah

Longrider poses the question:
Here’s an easy question. What do the following have in common - people on housing benefit, people getting child benefit, people wanting to be RAF pilots or Royal Marines, people in hospital and people learning to drive? The answer is that they have all had their personal details lost through government incompetence. And here’s another question. With the national database for ID cards looming, just how much do you trust the government to keep your identity details safe?

Right - so we're not in disagreement over the incompetence but the level of it raises other questions. It's so regularly revealed to the media and they so public pronounce on it with handwringing aqpology that surely one's suspicions are aroused. All public sectors have levels of incompetence but this seems almost to have been orchestrated.

Now what could be a possible reason for this? Perhaps that the people are so sick and tired of it that they throw out the corrupt, self-serving, incompetent bastards and usher in the new slick, efficient EUmodel which looks after the common person's interests with the only drawback being the little chip in the right wrist.

Why not? They laughed at Noah. Time will tell.

Monday, January 21, 2008

[russia] some myths and misinterpretations

Just ran the Dmitri Panov piece past our new Deputat, home from Moscow for a few days.

Predictably, as a former trade minister and now special adviser on trade to the Gosduma, he took exception to some aspects and I'd like to summarize some of his main points from today.

1. That the Russian mentality is historically as different to the western as is the Chinese.

The Deputat disagrees and says that since 1998, great strides have taken place in 'rethinking' Russia's place in the world economy and putting Russia on a stable economic footing. There are western aspects to people's thinking now which might not have been there earlier. To that end, the probable new president is committed to this new Yedinaya Rossiya mentality, as are most of the newer deputats. A lot of people have done a lot of work trying to restructure the Russian economy to perform more effectively on the world stage and negative stereotypes are therefore ultimately counter-productive.

2. Russia has a different concept of democracy to the west's.

To an extent that's true. There is historical local colour in the complex relations between the different nationalities represented in the RF and these require balance. As yet, this country cannot adopt the parliamentary system of, say, Britain because it has a Tsarist tradition and the decades of Communism.

It has to be introduced carefully to allow the people time to adjust to the new realities and the infrastructure must move with each introduced change. Wholesale change too quickly resulted in 1998 and no one wants that to occur ever again, particularly given the western troubles about to bite over there.

So a reserved stance is necessary - watching, evaluating and deciding how much to introduce and how soon. These are not blandishments and you need to be in here at governmental level to understand what really is on the drawing board. Therefore it's unfortunate the way sections of the western media rush to the most negative assessment so quickly. It was particularly impressed on me today that Russia does listen to the criticisms and weighs them up - there is no collective blindness here - but it makers its decisions based on national interest nonetheless.

3. Russia has a newly aggressive stance towards the west [not specifically in the Panov article].

Just as in the west, there are hawks and doves and shades of opinion and there is most certainly a desire for Russia to be taken more seriously on the world stage - almost all are agreed on this - and trade delegations ffom here will continue to push Russian interests as you'd expect they would. But the prospect of a new cavalier attitude and a newly aggressive policy is not a general stance - where it has been highly publicized by the media, it's been more a case of stonewalling specific things certain countries are doing inside Europe to destabilize the sphere adjacent to Russia.

The overall mood and one even agreed by Mr. Zhirinovsky and other hardliners, is that Russia is a major player and cold war tactics have no place in where this country is going. Trade is the new language of diplomacy when it is allowed to breathe and not misrepresented.

[globalization rocks] according to broony

Well, no debate necessary any more about what Gordon's masters are up to:
In a keynote speech in New Delhi, the prime minister said it was time to build a "new global society".Mr Brown also called for greater international cooperation in the battle against terrorism to "ensure that there is no hiding place for terrorists".
No hiding place for dissenters, he means of course. Bloggers get ready - you are the insurgents of the web and a nice gurney, replete with electrodes, awaits you. Correct thinking will be ensured.

Also, ever wonder who Gordon sees as the leader of the new global society? Djwahl Kuhl perhaps? Or him-glorious-self? Oh, worship the Broon.

Do you detect a slight negativity in today's posts? Got out of bed on the wrong side.

[round the world] record smashed

Joyon's IDEC II

Exciting news not just for the yachties:
Frenchman Francis Joyon [51] has smashed Ellen MacArthur's solo round-the-world record by more than 14 days, finishng his circumnavigation in 57 days, 13 hours 34 minutes and six seconds to beat MacArthur's mark set in 2005.

He set off from Brest on 23 November and crossed the finish line on Sunday. MacArthur [31] congratulated Joyon but has not ruled out trying to reclaim the record one day saying "records are set to be broken".

But the 31-year-old confirmed any attempt would not be launched in the next year because she was already committed to other projects.

Apparently, Ms MacArthur was at the finish line to greet him and that's the thing in this sport - the camaraderie, even when there's rivalry. In my own racing days years ago, we'd fight tooth and nail and then have a hot tea together later in the clubhouse and analyse the whole thing.

Perfect example is the Little America's Cup for C Class catamarans - the racing was fierce but the camaraderie amazing, even down to the winning crew inviting the others to have a sail on their boat. The only other sport I know where we'd try to knock the other's block off and then have a meal together is Rugby Union.

Contrast that with the America's Cup itself which is marred by protests, underhanded tactics and obscene amounts of money. Of course, this description fits The Money perfectly so we know with whom we're dealing in that situation.

Leaving that aside, it is exciting though and raises the question of whether people should attempt these things or else spend it on education and social services.

C Class Catamaran Cogito

One other small matter is that what I've done in this post might be seen as precisely what I was moaning about here. Oh well, I plead guilty.

[hillary] heart skipped a beat

Just checked BBC News and it was like the heart momentarily stopped:

Mourners pay respects to Hillary

Don't tell me! It's not possible. Clinton dead and the world spared. But no, it was not to be:

Hundreds of people file past the casket of Everest conqueror Sir Edmund Hillary, ahead of his state funeral.

Oh well. Don't get the idea I want the Lizard Queen dead - no, no. Not at all. Not any way. I'd like Obama or someone to beat her after the MLK jibes but still ....

Now, as for the real Hillary, Sir Edmund - well, a great man indeed but he'd had a good innings.

Sunday, January 20, 2008

[not dormant] just preoccupied

Sorry for the lack of posts and lack of visiting. The whole of the first book is being rewritten and though it uses great slabs of text from the original, it needs linking sections and that's what I've been up to. A professional writer can split his attention two ways but I can't do that, so it has to be one or the other just now. Plan to blog tomorrow.

[diabetes] most certainly there's hope


We all feel that little bit more mortal when one of our own, so to speak, develops a medical condition and the words 'there but for the Grace of G-d' spring to the lips.

Diabetes is, to me, worse than cancer because cancer is a release sooner or later. I wouldn't wish either onto my worst enemy. The worst I'd wish onto an enemy is want of friends. There is most certainly hope, for example with statin drugs, tweaking of ordinary adult cells in the pancreas so they become insulin-producing beta cells, iron-based 'magnetocapsules' of insulin-producing cells and so on and so on.

There is hope.

I don't know why I fear diabetes so, having seen my father succumb to emphazema and hepatitis and my mother to chronic bronchitis and asthma and yet I do fear it. Medical opinion on me is currently that I should fear more for the heart, in more ways than one.

I have no doubt that Iain will face this thing stoically and that all that can be done will be done. Crazy thing to say but better now than fifteen years earlier - there's a better chance now of getting back to that normal life.

Saturday, January 19, 2008

[unsung blogs] talent largely undiscovered

Disclaimer: the following post makes no reference to this blog in any shape or form. The author is not referring to himself at any stage of the proceedings in any category below nor is he fishing. He'd vastly prefer the issue itself to be addressed.

You know that Blogpower was originally designed to promote and support new blogs and the assumption was - blogs of quality. Speaking of quality in a blog, one might just as well speak of defining love. What on earth does it mean?

The blogs which survive seem to have an angle, a manner of writing which is fresh and the output is fairly constant. The blog is fun to visit and we want to return to see what he or she's posted next. We feel we "know" the author. Despite his many detractors, Iain Dale deserves his place at the top for his constant output and consistency. The angle and the scoop are his thing.

Some blogs, as everyone knows, are whatever the current jargon is for non-blogs, i.e. offshoot blogs from a previous project or special, slick sites with poor navigation and transparency which disguise an already established pundit who wishes to try a new project out on a new readership.

Having said all that, it's always been a source of wonder to me how one or two major blogs, which will remain unnamed, are lauded and repeatedly visited, when all they are is news commentary, with the occasional original angle, on the Telegraph, Guardian or Washington Post. They read the papers as we read the papers and then rattle something off on the story of the day, as we also do.

A news story breaks, they comment in their blog with fairly constant typos and that's it. Few graphics, no originality and yet they get upwards of two thousand readers a day. It has to be that they are so prolific or else they're seen as good guys by a section of the sphere. Or else they have kudos in some other sphere, e.g. the MSM or in IT. Who knows?

Don't get me wrong here - there are some fabulous exponents of the art. Some simply rise above the rest, such as Mr. Eugenides, bloggers who really do have the talent to not only see the more ridiculous aspects of the news but can write them up as well.

Then there are the blogs where the personality of the blogger seems to be the thing because the actual output is nothing more than what he did last week or else tits and bums. These guys get mega-readerships and good luck to them.

The blogs which concern me most are those with either true talent or something that little bit different about them and they don't receive their due. Not only that but they're too modest to shamelessly promote themselves. One of these is Ruthie Zaftig and another is The Broadsheet Rag. A more established blogger with a steady readership is Longrider who should be up in the mega-class. Now I don't know what their stats are but I'm willing to bet that the stats are infinitely inferior to the quality of the blog.

It amazes me that they don't enjoy greater kudos in the sphere. I know they have loyal readerships but that's not what I'm referring to. I mean a mass readership. Perhaps TBR could be a bit more transparent - the "About" says almost nothing and it's nice to know at least something of the author. [I do know one or two things but not openly.]

In the end, there are just too many blogs and trying to seek out the good ones is a largely hit or miss affair. If only there was some way for true talent to naturally gravitate to the top - some sort of mechanism to enable that. This "mechanism" is something very much running through the mind at this point in time.

Friday, January 18, 2008

[new mac] vulnerable or not


It's hard to know whom to believe. First I read this report on MacOS vulnerability, claiming that he:

...used vulnerability statistics from an impartial third party vendor Secunia and I broke them down by Windows XP flaws, Vista flaws, and Mac OS X flaws...

Then there was a rebuttal, going into everything from the antecedents of George Ou and ZD net to the nature of Secunia data in the first place. As author Daniel Dilger concluded:

I should point out that I’m not attempting to suggest that Apple has no flaws, cannot possibly deliver problematic software, or can’t improve in its efforts.

There are fairly well documented problems with Safari, Bluetooth, Apple Mail and even the Finder system. Many have read of the hacker who took over a Mini in 30 minutes. So yes, Mac users should not be complacent.

But it would be lovely to see a bit of impartial reporting from someone not in either camp. Meanwhile, the Mac continues as a lovely system to work with and as I become more Mac literate, new vistas open up. One of my favouites is using both hands to execute commands and then voice commands to switch applications.

If I want to play a playlist, I just say "Music" and when it opens, name a playlist and then say "Play". Quite nice if I'm in the middle of typing this.

[broon] executed in tibet

As Broony's double landed at Beijing International Airport, to be greeted by Wen Jiabao and President Hu doubles and driven the 25.35 km to Tiananmen Square for a good laugh at democracy, the real perpetrators were being Virginned to Lhasar Gonggar and from there by cablecar to the remote mountaintop Temple of Djwal Kuhl.

Grand Master Wu, of the Tian Di Hui ordered Broony to be placed in the centre of the square in white robes and the ancient and honourable servants of Sun Yee On, Wo Shing Wo, 14K knelt menacingly in rows, awaiting the ordeal.

A robed Red Pole read out the charge:
In an article on the Number 10 website, you wrote: "I believe that with the right help we will have a situation by 2025 where the number of English speakers in China exceeds the number of speakers of English as a first language in all of the rest of the world."
Gasps went round the assembled multitude. Had Broony actually uttered such inanities, when all supreme, enlightened, occult ancients present this day were well aware of the coming hegemony of the new Sun Zi Dynasty and its brother dynasty the Round Table of Europe, which had given Broony his start.

The executioner stepped quickly up behind Broony and at a signal from Wu, the war sword severed his head, which rolled onto the flagstones. All present gave the three finger left handed salute and honour had been satisifed.

[lit quiz] name the authors


1. Dien Tynblo [children's stories]
2. Arlehcs Skidnec [please sir, may I have more]
3. Kranf Raridsch [Greyfriars]
4. Cahrird Smarda [Hazel and Blackberry]
5. Xirbeta Toterp [Flopsy, Mopsy, and Cotton-tail]
6. G. H. Lewsl [Martians]
7. Draydur Klinpig [if only I could think of it]
8. Milwail Aesperkhase [a complete unknown]
9. Nai Glinfem [not really Welsh, as Broccoli well knows]
10. Egroeg Lewlor [clocks were striking thirteen]



No peeking, now:


Blyton, Dickens, Richards, Adams, Potter, Wells, Kipling, the Bard, Fleming, Orwell

[quick one] wonders never cease


Just google the word "nourishing". It might only last a few minutes and I may have dropped back again by now but still, it was good while it lasted.

Thursday, January 17, 2008

[russia] vain expectations

This is the first time I've directly run a guest post from one of my Russian friends and it appears unedited below. By Dmitri Panov, the intellectual advocate [my words, not his]:

Western countries' nervous reaction to the last Russian elections is a part of the great problem of their misunderstanding of Russia. Western people are extremely stubborn in their expectations of democracy in Russia, but their hopes are always in vain.

I suppose that the reason of those expectations is a little bit funny: similarity in appearance of Russian and European people. This fact has been confusing many people for many years and even centuries – both in Russia and abroad.

But the truth is that: similarity in appearance doesn’t indicate an internal similarity. And internal difference between Russian people and Western people is not less than – for example- between Western people and Chinese or Middle Eastern peoples.

If anybody wants to check this fact he has to look at the essential events of the Russian modern history, such as, for example, lower classes revolution of 1917, atheism and existence for 90 years without real upper class . So what reasons do we have to assume that this convoluted way will lead Russia to the Western type of democracy?

The best thing for Western people is to understand finally that Russians are absolutely different and Russia has been going through the centuries by its own special way, with all pluses and minuses – like all countries in the world. Eventually the real aim of every society is justice and fairness.

And democracy per se is only one of the ways to achieve them and – according to Plato - far from being the best.

January, 2007

Go for it, readers. :)

[bond] not so bulky next time

From the interview:

Craig was asked how long he planned on staying in the role. "Until they tell me to stop", he said. "I want to get the next one right and we'll go from there.

How [is he] shaping up for his next outing as 007?

"Arrghh! I was big for the last one, and it wasn’t a mistake, it was a definite statement. This guy, when he takes his shirt off, should look like he could kill someone. After it finished, I stopped training. I got drunk for three months!

No, I didn’t, but certainly relaxed for three months and ate what I wanted, and then it’s hell because as soon as you get back in the gym, you have to work all that off, and it takes much longer than it does to put it on. Last time I did a lot of weights to bulk up because I had to do it quickly.

This time I’m going to do more boxing and more running. I need to be physically strong for Bond and, as much as I looked in great shape, I got a lot of injuries, probably due to the fact that I wasn’t doing enough running and jumping, which is what I needed to do in the film. I won’t look physically much different, but I won’t be as ‘no neck’ as I was last time."

Craig was asked how long he planned on staying in the role. "Until they tell me to stop", he said. "I want to get the next one right and we'll go from there.

Bond 22:

In November 2008, Bond 22 will see 007 fight an emotional battle after the loss of Vesper, unravel the mystery of Mr. White's shadowy organisation, and romance the sexy and charming Camille - played by Olga Kurylenko.

That's wonderful - I loved the end of 21, when Mr. White got his. You know these bstds love colour coding and the word cabal is a misnomer for what really goes down - money is just the bulwark. It will be more than interesting how much is allowed to be revealed.

Of course, they never really "get theirs" in real life but a man can dream.

[strawpoll] presidential election

Results of the straw poll on the American election:

Just your gut feeling, please, for Prez?
Selection
Votes
McCain 18%7
Romney 3%1
Other 35%14
Obama 30%12
Lizard Queen 15%6
40 votes total

Wednesday, January 16, 2008

[corruption] legalize it and it goes away

Everyone's been talking about it - Dizzy with his non-specific bank accounts - and a dozen or more other august bloggers, let alone the media but there's still one thing I don't get.

Call me obtuse but I don't understand why we need to monitor, register or concern ourselves in any way with sources of parliamentary funding and by extension - sources of presidential funding in the States.

It's so hypocritical anyway. The real funding comes in surreptitiously, via the Club of this or the Club of that or from individuals who know individuals who know a banker anyway, so why bother?

I'm not condoning corruption. I'm simply condoning the uncorrupting of corruption. If everyone is corrupt, absolutely everyone, then there is no corruption any more.

Works well in certain countries.

[winter] from russia with love


Strange sort of day - winter and yet not winter.

During the November to March period in this country, it's best if the temperature sits about minus 8 to 10, with forays down to 28 or 30 on occasions. In practice, especially in these latter years, it wildly fluctuates.

Warmer weather is not such a good thing. When there's a hard frost and the earth is rock hard, the snow ameliorates the harshness with its silent, slightly surreal, cushioning effect but down below, good things are happening.

The immediate beneficiary is the flora, which really does need a hard frost to regenerate next spring but lower temperatures also have the effect of rendering dormant all the nasties - sickness in the true cold is quite rare. Instead, there's an almost comforting existence outside and this, combined with the festive season, leads to a spirit of near-goodwill.

Today though, with it's near zero temperatures, the roads are slushy, making them impossible for drivers, there is sickness and crankiness, the sky is a dull grey, as distinct from its snow-threatening mode, which is much brighter - and the electricity is not good in the atmosphere.

This is a nation too, where the old and superstitious vie with the knew western direness. A young man will solemnly inform you that you must let your cat go in first when entering a new flat because cats have second sight. A girl will warn you never to let yourself be photographed because others will use incantations, in connection with the photo, to place hexes on you [last time I checked there were eleven on me from four women].

You never hand money to anyone in the evening and it's best not to do so at any time. It must be placed on the table and the other picks it up. You never shake hands in a doorway or sit at the corner of a table or conduct business across a corner. Not surprisingly, feng shui has some currency over here although being eastern, it is less popular - China is still the most immediate enemy and the U.S.A. seen as second.

The attitude to America is ambivalent - the culture of dire music, burger thinking, feminism and laissez-faire relationships has made huge inroads and yet politically, most Russians resent what America is doing in Kosovo, the Ukraine and in other places. The U.S.A. leadership, as distinct from the people themselves, is seen as the enemy of peace around the world, at odds with the average American who really believes his country is the last bastion of democracy.

It's hard to appreciate the destruction wrought on this country during the soviet era and the legacy in terms of the people who survived. A great slice of the nation was either eliminated or driven into exile. The intelligentsia as a class does not exist and the highest offices are held by a far more pragmatic class. There is an unreal proportion of fools, as there is in America today.

Everyone knows the jokes on the internet about the stupid bankrobbers, Miss Universe who's not sure whether her knickers are over or under and the proliferation of spam which presupposes a certain lack of nouse.

Bryson often wrote of this phenomenon and it's ably assisted by the dumbing down of education and lack of knowledge of the wider world. Well - that is just as much so here, now that education is breaking down and the new ignorance is mortifying.

You only have to look at the decisions drivers make on the roads to see a really brute mental sluggishness at large, all around. Not with all. Not with , of course There's razor sharp intellect across the strata but it's in a minority. Again - not a lot different to anywhere else out in the wider world, except that this nation has intellectual traditions and names of world standing in science and the arts. Old names now. Russians once contributed to the stock of world knowledge out of proportion to their opportunities but no longer.

We are now in the day of the global yahoo and I blame the west.

Women - I know I have an idealized view of women - savvy, smart, beautiful, chic, fabulously warm and liking to be treated as ladies - but the non-capacity of so many girls to be that now, as distinct from formerly, is dismaying.

This is the day of herd rutting and excess of substances, of clubbing in lieu of culture - not a bad thing every so often but the chav mentality wears thin very quickly. Such young people, especially the girls, cannot, simply cannot, carry out a rational conversation beyond an 800 word vocabulary, largely jargon. And their life concerns leave one seriously wondering.

What's more, there's a whole nation of them rising.

The majority wish to and some actually do pull themselves out of it and their parents expend huge energy and money on sons and daughters to "ejukate" them [I avoid this trap like the plague] but it's largely a losing battle. Another stratum - the self made businessman or woman - that's a different matter and these will do what it takes to become the cutters and dicers of the near future. Such people are driven and no prizes for guessing which stratum I target.

It's still a largely patriarchal society and the men are not going to relinquish this readily but already change is overtaking them. The educated women are taking over, not that they weren't always present.

This requires explanation. Yes, it is patriarchal here and yet there is a tradition that the financial institutes are for girls. Can you credit that? 80% of students at these places would be girls. So where are the boys? Either at the energy and engineering institutes or else wheeling and dealing and trying to make a fortune that way. The vast majority fail, drop out and their existence is then a question of scrambling around to survive.

Therefore, there's a certain lawlessness and the rogue males are everywhere in herds. I personally don't worry too much about the ever-present threat - if it happens, it happens and there's enough rogue male in me anyway to rationalize it for now.

You can be hurt here and quickly too.

Without your network, without a "krisha" or roof, protection in other words, you just don't survive, especially if you're foreign. You're judged by your krisha [which, by the way, no one calls it any more] and if it's good, there's a growling sort of acceptance that it's best not to touch you. But things can alter and wholesale changes can occur overnight so it's best to be constantly at the ready to fly.

It would be wrong to err by painting a picture of a dire, bestial existence, a Russia in black. This is simply not so. The west knows the warm hearts of these people, the friendliness once they know you're a friend and the fierce loyalty to the loyal.

The food is fresh and delicious, the Russian cuisine is mildly spicy and they have so many names for variants on foods which we have but one name for, e.g. jam. The efficacy of kefir or katik last thing at night, the knowledge of various meats and which combinations go best is universal. Even men know.

I put out a two jams the other day to have with the tea and the chap went straight for the one made by the grandmother. How did he know? He knew that varenye is boiled jam, that many berry jams are fresh and that the bottled commercial variety are preserves. The one he chose was a grandmother type. He knows which fish to buy and which to let be. There is a native knowledge here which I simply don't possess but I'm learning.

The women are stunning, the male's warm smile and big bear handshake is reassuring and there's a lack of ceremony which can be misunderstood. Hypothetical example - someone calls and a conversation would go like this:

"Did he arrive?"

"Da."

"Did he pay?"

"No."

"Right we go elsewhere. Tell him to f- off."

Phone goes down and new deal is made.

Truth is - I prefer it this way. You want to eat? Yes. How much? Second dish size [meaning a main meal]. All right - twenty minutes. Out come the meat and veg, followed by tea and sweets - and when you're done, you say "spasibo", often to no one in particular and then it's back to work.

If you don't happen to have any work, then you create it by getting out the drill and drilling into the neighbour's wall. [I swear I'm buying a kalashnikov and I'm going to gun that bstd down.]

I know everyone lives their fast life not dissimilarly, even in Britain but there is a perfunctory nature to it all here - again, that special lack of ceremony - which is clear and to the point. No frills - straight into it. Especially in sex. At strategic points around the city the phone numbers are sprayed on walls. You need it - just phone.

I had a discussion about this with some Russian men. Why on earth would you pay a walking disease centre for an hour's rutting, when there are just so many stunning girls around? The wry smile was no answer and when pressed, they said that it's instant, without complexes and without complications. Faced with an hour of unpressured release or going home to the shrill catalogue of defects read out to you night after night, a proportion of men take the road of less resistance.

Buying and selling encapsulates the mentality here - you're never "thinking of" buying anything. If you tell your friend you're "thinking of" buying a Sonata, he reaches for a mobile to make the call and expects you'll have the bankroll already in the coat pocket, ready to go.

To the Brits and to the Yanks I'd say that there really is a quite different mentality behind that beautiful Russian face. The face can fool you, looking so European but in fact the mentality is alien. But it can be lived with, with understanding and the longer you go on, the more you warm to it. The only question which remains is whether the Brits, Yanks and Russians wish to warm to each other.

That appears to be the main question just now.


Tuesday, January 15, 2008

[björk] berserkist tradition revived


Photographer for the New Zealand Herald Glenn Jeffrey accused Icelandic singer-songwriter Björk of attacking him at the airport in Auckland in New Zealand yesterday. He said she had attacked him for no good reason and torn his T-shirt.

“I took a couple of pictures and I got about three or four frames of her [...] and as I turned and walked away she came up behind me, grabbed the back of my black skivvy [long T-shirt] and tore it down the back,” Jeffery told the New Zealand Herald.

This is not the first time that Björk has lashed out at the media. Twelve years ago she attacked a TV reporter at the airport in Bangkok after the reporter allegedly harassed her and her son. Björk later apologized for the incident.

Perhaps this desire to unclothe the reporter stemmed from her deeply held belief that wearing more than a few leaves posed a grave mental health risk. Or was it some sort of race memory of her forebears, the Berserks, once again asserting itself?

[true confessions] je déteste

I've never ever read a Harry Potter nor seen any film of the ilk. I have not the least clue what reality TV is or whether Big Idol and American Brother are something real or a home for ASBOs.

Since my television was stolen ten years ago, there has not been the least desire to replace it.

I do confess to once watching the colour coded Cilla Liverpool's Blind Date or whatever it was called and it appeared to be for non-comps to postulate on pointless things and to look inarticulately ultra-cool while putting down other contestants. This was confirmed when they interviewed a couple, near the end, who spent the entire time slagging one another off.

Somehow, all of these were labelled entertainment. Still, it beat On the Buses and Alf Garnett.

On the "good" list?

Doctor Who, Fawlty, All Gas and Gaiters, Rumpole, Python, Yes Minister, Young Ones and one or two others. :)

[novels] ongoing dialogues

As many regulars know, Sean of Omnium has been kind enough to cast a critical eye over the first book [I hope I can say "so far" but he's free to stop this whenever he wishes] and he's brought up some structural and also sundry minor problems which need resolution.

So I find myself heavily involved in rewriting and thus the blog has been suffering. It struck me that this process might be bloggable in itself and so I asked him if he'd mind me using the "structural part" of my last letter as a post in itself. So here it is:

Sean, thanks again. Your comments raise issues which need to be addressed and are excellent.

Characters with similar sounding names. Yesterday, I went through and changed all variants of Anya to Anya itself in all chapters, including in the second book. As for Moscow Anna, she remains as she is when Anya is involved but when it is clearly only Hugh and her in the action, then she drops back to Anna.

Ksenia/Ksusha [the latter a diminutive of the former] can be solved by a little dialogue near the beginning in which this is explained.

The "A" characters - Liya, Lisa, Aliya etc. You know, Sean, this is the actual dilemma over here. These are real names for girls I know - the things I write on the blog are only part of the real truth about girls in this town - it truly is a hedonist's paradise over here and one learns to be more circumspect about it. My only device can be to alter the names completely, once the book is done. Using those names while I was writing was necessary because their characters had to come through in the action.

Omniscience. Very great problem. Firstly, author omniscience. This is the trouble in the first five or six chapters because they were originally autobiographical and written in the first person - they were a log of what really had happened. Then I rewrote those chapters in the third person but the danger therewas that Hugh became a real Mary Sue and the author knew too much. Later, he doesn't.

I'll go back through and remove all the "and that was the last time they were together" type of comments, which should solve that. Allied to this is the device of the Afterword first. This Afterword is lifted straight from Chapter 20 and is intended to raise fears or expectations of an inevitable tragedy plus one other thing. The action in the first three or four chapters is slow and mundane - a man travelling to Russia, settling in and discovering new things.

This has been interesting to the Russians themselves who recognize what I'm writing about and want to know how a foreigner sees it but whether it's so interesting to a wider readership is a question. Was that sort of description interesting to you? The Afterword device is not new but it presupposes author omniscience.

Hugh's omniscience is a greater problem - he's annoying in that he knows so much but again, the difficulty is that he actually does, operating, as he does, in fields in which he has experience, which are many. Again, it's necessary to go back through and ascribe his knowledge to something he just read recently - he can be a sort of bookworm who comes up with facts or else one of the other characters can become the wise one and he consults her [or him] as some sort of oracle.

His knowledge of human nature is virtually unsolvable. He does have experience of life and his work has given him insight - plus he trusts no one. Again, to solve that raises the question of whether we wish to solve it. Do we want a character without ability or is he allowed expertise in some areas? He's not a great lover [he's only as good as any of us] and he never fights, nor does he know a way through - events carry him along plus he's not handsome. Perhaps that was the greater crime - not to make him handsome.

His weapons are therefore charm and knowledge of character. The latter can make people uncomfortable and we often don't warm to someone who knows and can see through us, hence the desire to prove him wrong, to say he's mistaken. This is problematic with Hugh in the first book but is solved in the second when he finds himself in unfamiliar surroundings where the women know far more than he does.

There's a lady I know here reading Book 2 first as Hugh is more at the mercy of the women in France [she is a French translator]. In Russia, it's the opposite problem and the reason why the Russian male is arrogant. It really is easy to dominate girls in this patriarchal society and I try not to but they almost invite me to. And they are beautiful too. Also, they don't have the western feministic superwoman motif yet so the society is still male-friendly.

Thank you so, so much for opening my eyes to the problems - I can't start to tell you how valuable this is. James

Monday, January 14, 2008

[happy birthday] lewisham kate


[writing] the incisors and the grinders

Samuel Johnson wrote, on April 6th, 1776:

No man but a blockhead ever wrote, except for money.

Maybe, Samuel J but this raises the spectre of the hack, Senancour's 1804 Obermann, Willy Loman, to shamelessly mix metaphors, the writer who writes because he is into writing itself, has visions of the poet in the garrett or else puts out a piece, just to keep the bread on the table.

Walter Bagehot wrote, in 1858:

Writers, like teeth, are divided into incisors and grinders.

To be a grinder seems, in my mind, to be a denial of the purpose of existence, a shaming epitaph to one's talent or lack of it. Like Roald Dahl, I'm terrified of mediocrity, of boring the reader and even at university, I've dropped, over the years, the lessons which don't go down well and retained those which were "winners".

I just cannot wrap the mind round the concept of Keats, from 1819:

All clean and comfortable, I sit down to write.

... although, to be fair, he was referring to a letter he was beginning at the time and he had already written, in 1818:

If poetry comes not as naturally as the leaves to a tree, it had better not come at all.

Upfront I claim no literary talent and these words are of the process only, not the end result. However, I just cannot sit down, "all clean and comfortable" to write. I can't do it. It's more a case of waking up at 3 a.m. with thoughts storming through the brain and having to switch on the Mac [it goes to bed with me - truly], of waiting impatiently and then the fingers just take over and I have absolutely no idea where they're going to take me.

It's not even me - it's just something there and characters fly in, fly out, drop by, return and the thing just has to fly ever onward, up hill, down dale, until it stops. When it does, switching off is the only solution until the next time it happens. Usually I crash back to sleep and that's that.

This isn't literature, it's - well, I don't know what it is. Insanity?

So the result is raw, dotted with errors and then, one day, when a fine young chap quietly begins painstaking proof reading and all his suggestions have talent in themselves and when one stops to think of what he''s attempting in his own creativity and the literary persona he himself is and why the hell he is spending time on me, then the jaw drops and one wonders about life.

He makes constant corrections and all are justified, he suggests I develop the character of Konstantine the Cypriot more, he's glad the plot is finally opening up and so on. Can you understand how that puts you on edge, makes you go back and reexamine, rework, enhance, make smoother. It's a heady experience and to know there is a taskmaster on your tale* is a wonderful thing.

Surely these days now are what life is about. This is the wine you sup, the days spent productively. You have to forever feel, hurt, jump for joy, bask in the passion and then crash to darkest oblivion. And always the brute existence beckons, it's always just there behind you, wishing you to rest on your laurels and sink back to it, like quicksand, to become, once again, just another automaton.

Aaaagh, it must never be. Your talent or lack of it is a separate issue but the process itself is the thing and the day you stop is the day you die as homo sapiens.

Sorry, sorry - I've now taken my tablets and am once more feeling a trifle more "usual". Thus, I sit me down to write:

"Gordon Brown today harvested some organs ..."

* intended

[slough of despond] let's extricate ourselves


There is no doubt that interraction is the thing and over the weekend, I just wasn't interacting. You see, I had the chance of proof-reading for my books and had to work to keep ahead of this and have the next chapter ready. Plus I had professional proof reading to do too [less interesting]. Still have now.

Thus I didn't visit and thus my own visits dropped. Even the reliable googling dropped. Not disastrously but we do seem to be in a slough of despond just now, many of us. Andrew Allison wrote:

Yesterday I wasn't feeling at my best. When you look at how many hits you are getting on your blog and things aren't going as well as you would like, there is a tendency for despondency. I would like to thank those who have left comments encouraging me to continue. Dave wrote a comment that he reads the blog through my RSS feed every day and of course that doesn't come on to my site statistics. I don't know why I didn't realise this sooner as I read many blogs by this method too.

My thought is that the thing is temporary, the winter weather has a lot to do with it, we're all pretty busy just now and no need for overreaction on this. Keep the blog ticking over and though it is done more slowly, keep visiting. All will be well.

If you do happen to find yourself in the blogging quicksand, here is some advice. And one last thing - could you spare a minute and pop over to Andrew and cheer him up a bit on this cold, grey Monday?