Sunday, May 17, 2009
Saturday, May 16, 2009
[thought for the day] saturday evening
An atheist is a man who has no invisible means of support.
John Buchan [1943]
John Buchan [1943]
[flight theory] and its application to sailing
This post is dedicated to Gallimaufry.
Children are taught the following basics:
… which might be followed up by this:
… which then leads to a discussion of the Bernoulli Effect:
The Bernoulli Effect is taken to infer that air, when it approaches a wing, separates into an upper and lower stream, the upper stream moving faster because of the curved surface and therefore creating lower pressure, the lower stream moving more slowly on a flat surface, with both streams reaching the trailing edge at the same time and exiting the wing. High pressure below, low pressure above, the wing lifts.
Gale M. Craig says:
Although Bernoulli's law is sound and well proven, the premise of equal transit time is invalid and without foundation in known physics. Thus the most popular explanation, world-wide, of wing operation is false, and easily shown to be so.
In total then, upward movement ahead, rearward movement above, forward movement below and downward movement behind constitute a circulatory movement traveling with the wing, which is known as "circulation superimposed on passing flow".
That’s a fairly complicated explanation for the layman but perhaps this picture shows some of the variables more clearly:
You’ll notice that the wing is angled to the fuselage, not by a lot but enough so that it is always pointing upwards, except at the tips, where you can see there is a twist downwards, if you can imagine the plane flying level. The angle is sometimes called angle of attack. Compared to the horizontal diagrams used to explain Bernoulli, this is far more complicated.
Another factor is the planform or shape of the wing. One of the most efficient is the ellipse, referring not so much to the actual shape but to the aerodynamics of airloss towards the tips. Add to that the vortices, the effect of wingtips, flaps and ailerons and it’s not so easy.
Louis A. Bloomfield, Professor of Physics, The University of Virginia, puts it this way:
Here’s a Wiki demonstration of the Coander effect:
From this NACA foil section, you can see that the wing is not always flat below either:
My field of expertise is not in flight aerodynamics but in sailboat aerodynamics and in aquadynamics, the design of yachts in other words; my current interest being ocean-going outrigger canoes, which usually have simpler rigs than a solid wing. For the afficianados, I’m currently exploring the crab claw, to make it reefable and the junk, to give it windward ability.
What’s more, I think I have a solution to both, which I’ll soon send to the respective associations with whom I’ve been in touch recently.
Solid wings are used, vertically, on yachts, as in the pic of Cogito, the current Little America’s Cup holder, seen below. You’ll notice that the wing consists of three sections and that if juxtaposed at a certain angle, as in the pic, it causes the leeward or curved side of the sail to resemble the upper surface of an aeroplane wing.
Note the vertical slot which creates airflow to the leeward side, thus speeding the stream even more and creating more lift.
The reason the wing must be shaped this way is that the boat must ‘tack’ through the eye of the wind and have the wind alternately on either side of it. This creates mechanical issues and issues of flexibility, leading to greater complication, as you’ll see by the Australian crew trying to sort out theirs:
If you really want to know the physics behind these solid wings, there is one man you should check - Tom Speer.
The bottom line with softsails is that it’s not as critical in a sailboat, which goes much slower and deals with different sets of Reynolds numbers, what you do to the windward or inner side of the foil [yachts travel much slower], as long as the outer curved surface is near perfectly aerodynamic. Besides, air does not flow as well after an obstruction [the bumpy part of a mast], followed by a concave section and so there are separation and reattachment issues.
To give you a practical example – every racing cat sailor knows that your mast rotation need only be two degrees too far or too little and you’ve created quite substantial stall.
The advantage of the soft sail is lack of complexity but it loses in narrow angle of attack. Why do hang gliders and ultralights and kites come down more often?
The advantage of the wing is that it gets lift at a wider angle of attack, making stalling less likely, a nice thing for aeroplane passengers to realize but it is heavier and it’s not as easy to de-power, which you often need to do.
Here’s the soft sail set up:
You’ll notice the curvature of the sail and especially the mast rotation of about 70 degrees to the fore and aft [front to back] line. You might also notice a lever at the base of the mast – this is the mast rotation limitation lever, connected to the sail structure itself, so when the sail goes anywhere, the mast goes with it, to create the correct outer shape.
You can see the curvature of the sail in the red batten – A Class tend to use flatter sails, as do the majority of very fast craft, this taken to extremes with ice yachts which sometimes have near flat sails and deeper, flatter masts, as in these skeeters:
Incidentally, the A Class is the one I used to race in the 80s, sometimes even with success, although my particular boat was an older design to what you see above. Here I am racing on a light wind day.
Some might say that the name of my boat is a good description of me as a blogger but I couldn’t possibly comment:
Just one last point of note. If you look at the top right of the pic and then below that, you’ll see two sets of strings streaming backwards, called telltales. The idea is to have each set roughly parallel so that the sail is set correctly to the wind.
You’ll see that though it is a near-calm day, those telltales are streaming and this illustrates that the sail can create its own wind, irrespective of what’s going on around. At least, this applies to efficient foils.
In the next article in this series, I’ll look in more detail at the flow characteristics of wings and keels, including vortices and the need for flaps, ailerons and end plates.
Children are taught the following basics:
… which might be followed up by this:
… which then leads to a discussion of the Bernoulli Effect:
The Bernoulli Effect is taken to infer that air, when it approaches a wing, separates into an upper and lower stream, the upper stream moving faster because of the curved surface and therefore creating lower pressure, the lower stream moving more slowly on a flat surface, with both streams reaching the trailing edge at the same time and exiting the wing. High pressure below, low pressure above, the wing lifts.Gale M. Craig says:
Although Bernoulli's law is sound and well proven, the premise of equal transit time is invalid and without foundation in known physics. Thus the most popular explanation, world-wide, of wing operation is false, and easily shown to be so.
In total then, upward movement ahead, rearward movement above, forward movement below and downward movement behind constitute a circulatory movement traveling with the wing, which is known as "circulation superimposed on passing flow".
Aerodynamic lift of a wing can be explained and calculated through simple application of Newtonian physics. Air flow following the contours of a wing in normal flight departs in a downward direction. In this redirection of flow, downward momentum is produced.
Upward reaction force (or lift) must be equal, according to Newtonian physics, to the downward rate of change of air momentum. Inclination of a lower wing surface deflects some air downward there, while greater downward deflection is produced as flow follows the downwardly-curving upper surface.
In the downwardly-curving flow, an upward pressure gradient exists which opposes atmospheric pressure to cause upper surface pressure reduction. Bernoulli's law is satisfied with velocity changes related to pressure changes when oncoming air accelerates over the wing leading edge into the reduced pressure above the wing and decelerates in encounter with increased pressure below the leading edge.
The pressure difference also accelerates air upward around the leading edge. These accelerations occur in accordance with Bernoulli's law, but the greater upper surface velocity is more easily explained as resulting from pressure difference, rather than causing it as popular theories teach.
As air is accelerated downward by wing passage, upward recirculation occurs all around the airplane, away from higher pressure below and toward lower pressure above. Thus recirculation occurs forward and upward around the wing, and laterally outward,upward and inward to produce twin trailing vortices which is made visible in smoke behind aerobatic plane wings at airshows.
Forward recirculation carries upwash into which the wing flies. Energy is recovered from leading edge upwash as circulation rounds the leading edge to produce centrifugal pressure reduction, known as "leading edge suction," and forward thrust. Leading edge suction is sometimes used to operate a stall warning horn.
Leading edge pressure reduction produces forward thrust on the wing, but curvature of circulation around the rear produces opposing rearward thrust. If these were equal they would cancel, but energy lost into lateral recirculation around the wing ends causes forward thrust to be less than rearward thrust.
The difference between these thrusts appears as drag, commonly referred to as "induced drag," because the classical mathematics treatment is similar to that of electromagnetism and electromagnetic induction.
That’s a fairly complicated explanation for the layman but perhaps this picture shows some of the variables more clearly:
You’ll notice that the wing is angled to the fuselage, not by a lot but enough so that it is always pointing upwards, except at the tips, where you can see there is a twist downwards, if you can imagine the plane flying level. The angle is sometimes called angle of attack. Compared to the horizontal diagrams used to explain Bernoulli, this is far more complicated.
Another factor is the planform or shape of the wing. One of the most efficient is the ellipse, referring not so much to the actual shape but to the aerodynamics of airloss towards the tips. Add to that the vortices, the effect of wingtips, flaps and ailerons and it’s not so easy.
Louis A. Bloomfield, Professor of Physics, The University of Virginia, puts it this way:
When air flows past an airplane wing, it breaks into two airstreams. The one that goes under the wing encounters the wing's surface, which acts as a ramp and pushes the air downward and forward. The air slows somewhat and its pressure increases. Forces between this lower airstream and the wing's undersurface provide some of the lift that supports the wing.
But the airstream that goes over the wing has a complicated trip. First it encounters the leading edge of the wing and is pushed upward and forward. This air slows somewhat and its pressure increases. So far, this upper airstream isn't helpful to the plane because it pushes the plane backward.
But the airstream then follows the curving upper surface of the wing because of a phenomenon known as the Coanda effect. The Coanda effect is a common behavior in fluids--viscosity and friction keep them flowing along surfaces as long as they don't have to turn too quickly. (The next time your coffee dribbles down the side of the pitcher when you poured too slowly, blame it on the Coanda effect.)
Because of the Coanda effect, the upper airstream now has to bend inward to follow the wing's upper surface. This inward bending involves an inward acceleration that requires an inward force. That force appears as the result of a pressure imbalance between the ambient pressure far above the wing and a reduced pressure at the top surface of the wing.
The Coanda effect is the result (i.e. air follows the wing's top surface) but air pressure is the means to achieve that result (i.e. a low pressure region must form above the wing in order for the airstream to arc inward and follow the plane's top surface).
The low pressure region above the wing helps to support the plane because it allows air pressure below the wing to be more effective at lifting the wing. But this low pressure also causes the upper airstream to accelerate. With more pressure behind it than in front of it, the airstream accelerates--it's pushed forward by the pressure imbalance.
Of course, the low pressure region doesn't last forever and the upper airstream has to decelerate as it approaches the wing's trailing edge--a complicated process that produces a small amount of turbulence on even the most carefully designed wing.
In short, the curvature of the upper airstream gives rise to a drop in air pressure above the wing and the drop in air pressure above the wing causes a temporary increase in the speed of the upper airstream as it passes over much of the wing.
Here’s a Wiki demonstration of the Coander effect:
If one holds the back of a spoon in the edge of a stream of water running freely out of a tap (faucet), the stream of water will deflect from the vertical to run over the back of the spoon. The effect can also be seen by placing a can in front of a lit candle. If one blows directly at the can, the air will bend around it and extinguish the candle.
From this NACA foil section, you can see that the wing is not always flat below either:
My field of expertise is not in flight aerodynamics but in sailboat aerodynamics and in aquadynamics, the design of yachts in other words; my current interest being ocean-going outrigger canoes, which usually have simpler rigs than a solid wing. For the afficianados, I’m currently exploring the crab claw, to make it reefable and the junk, to give it windward ability.What’s more, I think I have a solution to both, which I’ll soon send to the respective associations with whom I’ve been in touch recently.
Solid wings are used, vertically, on yachts, as in the pic of Cogito, the current Little America’s Cup holder, seen below. You’ll notice that the wing consists of three sections and that if juxtaposed at a certain angle, as in the pic, it causes the leeward or curved side of the sail to resemble the upper surface of an aeroplane wing.
Note the vertical slot which creates airflow to the leeward side, thus speeding the stream even more and creating more lift.
The reason the wing must be shaped this way is that the boat must ‘tack’ through the eye of the wind and have the wind alternately on either side of it. This creates mechanical issues and issues of flexibility, leading to greater complication, as you’ll see by the Australian crew trying to sort out theirs:
If you really want to know the physics behind these solid wings, there is one man you should check - Tom Speer.
The bottom line with softsails is that it’s not as critical in a sailboat, which goes much slower and deals with different sets of Reynolds numbers, what you do to the windward or inner side of the foil [yachts travel much slower], as long as the outer curved surface is near perfectly aerodynamic. Besides, air does not flow as well after an obstruction [the bumpy part of a mast], followed by a concave section and so there are separation and reattachment issues.
To give you a practical example – every racing cat sailor knows that your mast rotation need only be two degrees too far or too little and you’ve created quite substantial stall.
The advantage of the soft sail is lack of complexity but it loses in narrow angle of attack. Why do hang gliders and ultralights and kites come down more often?
The advantage of the wing is that it gets lift at a wider angle of attack, making stalling less likely, a nice thing for aeroplane passengers to realize but it is heavier and it’s not as easy to de-power, which you often need to do.
Here’s the soft sail set up:
You’ll notice the curvature of the sail and especially the mast rotation of about 70 degrees to the fore and aft [front to back] line. You might also notice a lever at the base of the mast – this is the mast rotation limitation lever, connected to the sail structure itself, so when the sail goes anywhere, the mast goes with it, to create the correct outer shape.
You can see the curvature of the sail in the red batten – A Class tend to use flatter sails, as do the majority of very fast craft, this taken to extremes with ice yachts which sometimes have near flat sails and deeper, flatter masts, as in these skeeters:
Incidentally, the A Class is the one I used to race in the 80s, sometimes even with success, although my particular boat was an older design to what you see above. Here I am racing on a light wind day.
Some might say that the name of my boat is a good description of me as a blogger but I couldn’t possibly comment:
Just one last point of note. If you look at the top right of the pic and then below that, you’ll see two sets of strings streaming backwards, called telltales. The idea is to have each set roughly parallel so that the sail is set correctly to the wind.
You’ll see that though it is a near-calm day, those telltales are streaming and this illustrates that the sail can create its own wind, irrespective of what’s going on around. At least, this applies to efficient foils.
In the next article in this series, I’ll look in more detail at the flow characteristics of wings and keels, including vortices and the need for flaps, ailerons and end plates.
Friday, May 15, 2009
[thought for the day] friday evening
Of course not but I’m told it works, even if you don’t believe in it.
Niels Bohr [1930]
Which is only to say that there might possibly be, just by an off chance, some things in life beyond our comprehension.
Niels Bohr [1930]
Which is only to say that there might possibly be, just by an off chance, some things in life beyond our comprehension.
[triumph bonneville] just for the hell of it
Perhaps this is pre-1966 - anyone know? Was the best the T120?| Manufacturer | Triumph Engineering Co Ltd |
|---|---|
| Also called | 'Bonne' |
| Production | 1959–1983 |
| Predecessor | TR6 Trophy |
| Engine | Four-stroke Parallel-twin |
| Power | 46 bhp (34 kW) @ 6,500 rpm (T120) |
| Transmission | 4-speed (later 5-speed) |
| Wheelbase | 55.75 in (1416.1 mm) |
| Weight | 395 lb (179 kg) |
| Related | TR7 Tiger |
[relativity] difficult to conceptualize
Now I know what you’re thinking: ‘Here I am this Friday, dreaming about the theory of relativity and Higham hasn’t posted anything on it for years.’ Fear no more, here it is, explained by Louis A. Bloomfield, Professor of Physics at the University of Virginia:
If you were at the back of a bus going the speed of light, and you were to run toward the front, would you be moving faster than the speed of light or turn into energy? -- TM, Ft. Bragg, NC
First, your bus can't be going at the speed of light because massive objects are strictly forbidden from traveling at that speed. Even to being traveling near the speed of light would require a fantastic expenditure of energy.
But suppose that the bus were traveling at 99.999999% of the speed of light and you were to run toward its front at 0.000002% of the speed of light (about 13 mph or just under a 5 minute mile). Now what would happen?
First, the bus speed I quoted is in reference to some outside observer because the seated passengers on the bus can't determine its speed. After all, if the shades are pulled down on the bus and it's moving at a steady velocity, no one can tell that it's moving at all. So let's assume that the bus speed I gave is according to a stationary friend who is watching the bus zoom by from outside.
While you are running toward the front of the bus at 0.000002% of the speed of light, your speed is in reference to the other passengers in the bus, who see you moving forward. The big question is what does you stationary friend see? Actually, your friend sees you running toward the front of the bus, but determines that your personal speed is only barely over 99.999999%. The two speeds haven't added the way you'd expect. Even though you and the bus passengers determine that you are moving quickly toward the front of the bus, your stationary friend determines that you are moving just the tiniest bit faster than the bus. How can that be?
The answer lies in the details of special relativity, but here is a simple, albeit bizarre picture. Your stationary friend sees a deformed bus pass by. Ignoring some peculiar optical effects due to the fact that it takes time for light to travel from the bus to your friend's eyes so that your friend can see the bus, your friend sees a foreshortened bus--a bus that is smashed almost into a pancake as it travels by. While you are in that pancake, running toward the front of the bus, the front is so close to the rear that your speed within the bus is miniscule. Why the bus becomes so short is another issue of special relativity.
The basis for Einstein's theory of relativity is the idea that everyone sees light moving at the same speed. In fact, the speed of light is so special that it doesn't really depend on light at all. Even if light didn't exist, the speed of light would still be a universal standard--the fastest possible speed for anything in our universe.
Once we recognize that the speed of light is special and that everyone sees light traveling at that speed, our views of space and time have to change. One of the classic "thought experiments" necessitating that change is the flashbulb in the boxcar experiment. Suppose that you are in a railroad boxcar with a flashbulb in its exact center. The flashbulb goes off and its light spreads outward rapidly in all directions. Since the bulb is in the center of the boxcar, its light naturally hits the front and back walls of the boxcar at the same instant and everything seems simple.
But your boxcar is actually hurtling forward on a track at an enormous speed and your friend is sitting in a station as the train rushes by. She looks into the boxcar through its window and sees the flashbulb go off. She watches light from the flashbulb spread out in all directions but it doesn't hit the front and back walls of the boxcar simultaneously. Because the boxcar is moving forward, the front wall of the boxcar is moving away from the approaching light while the back wall of the boxcar is moving toward that light. Remarkably, light from the flashbulb strikes the back wall of the boxcar first, as seen by your stationary friend.
Something is odd here: you see the light strike both walls simultaneously while your stationary friend sees light strike the back wall first. Who is right? The answer, strangely enough, is that you're both right. However, because you are moving at different velocities, the two of you perceive time and space somewhat differently. Because of these differences, you and your friend will not always agree about the distances between points in space or the intervals between moments in time. Most importantly, the two of you will not always agree about the distance or time separating two specific events and, in certain cases, may not even agree about which event happened first!
The remainder of the special theory of relativity builds on this groundwork, always treating the speed of light as a fundamental constant of nature. Einstein's famous formula, E=mc2, is an unavoidable consequence of this line of reasoning.
Clear?
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)