[the magdalene sisters] new entrants

Had to chuckle.

[triumph bonneville] just for the hell of it

Perhaps this is pre-1966 - anyone know? Was the best the T120?

Manufacturer	Triumph Engineering Co Ltd
Also called	'Bonne'
Production	1959–1983
Predecessor	TR6 Trophy
Engine	Four-stroke Parallel-twin
Power	46 bhp (34 kW) @ 6,500 rpm (T120)
Transmission	4-speed (later 5-speed)
Wheelbase	55.75 in (1416.1 mm)
Weight	395 lb (179 kg)
Related	TR7 Tiger

[relativity] difficult to conceptualize

Now I know what you’re thinking: ‘Here I am this Friday, dreaming about the theory of relativity and Higham hasn’t posted anything on it for years.’ Fear no more, here it is, explained by Louis A. Bloomfield, Professor of Physics at the University of Virginia:

If you were at the back of a bus going the speed of light, and you were to run toward the front, would you be moving faster than the speed of light or turn into energy? -- TM, Ft. Bragg, NC

First, your bus can't be going at the speed of light because massive objects are strictly forbidden from traveling at that speed. Even to being traveling near the speed of light would require a fantastic expenditure of energy.

But suppose that the bus were traveling at 99.999999% of the speed of light and you were to run toward its front at 0.000002% of the speed of light (about 13 mph or just under a 5 minute mile). Now what would happen?

First, the bus speed I quoted is in reference to some outside observer because the seated passengers on the bus can't determine its speed. After all, if the shades are pulled down on the bus and it's moving at a steady velocity, no one can tell that it's moving at all. So let's assume that the bus speed I gave is according to a stationary friend who is watching the bus zoom by from outside.

While you are running toward the front of the bus at 0.000002% of the speed of light, your speed is in reference to the other passengers in the bus, who see you moving forward. The big question is what does you stationary friend see? Actually, your friend sees you running toward the front of the bus, but determines that your personal speed is only barely over 99.999999%. The two speeds haven't added the way you'd expect. Even though you and the bus passengers determine that you are moving quickly toward the front of the bus, your stationary friend determines that you are moving just the tiniest bit faster than the bus. How can that be?

The answer lies in the details of special relativity, but here is a simple, albeit bizarre picture. Your stationary friend sees a deformed bus pass by. Ignoring some peculiar optical effects due to the fact that it takes time for light to travel from the bus to your friend's eyes so that your friend can see the bus, your friend sees a foreshortened bus--a bus that is smashed almost into a pancake as it travels by. While you are in that pancake, running toward the front of the bus, the front is so close to the rear that your speed within the bus is miniscule. Why the bus becomes so short is another issue of special relativity.

The basis for Einstein's theory of relativity is the idea that everyone sees light moving at the same speed. In fact, the speed of light is so special that it doesn't really depend on light at all. Even if light didn't exist, the speed of light would still be a universal standard--the fastest possible speed for anything in our universe.

Once we recognize that the speed of light is special and that everyone sees light traveling at that speed, our views of space and time have to change. One of the classic "thought experiments" necessitating that change is the flashbulb in the boxcar experiment. Suppose that you are in a railroad boxcar with a flashbulb in its exact center. The flashbulb goes off and its light spreads outward rapidly in all directions. Since the bulb is in the center of the boxcar, its light naturally hits the front and back walls of the boxcar at the same instant and everything seems simple.

But your boxcar is actually hurtling forward on a track at an enormous speed and your friend is sitting in a station as the train rushes by. She looks into the boxcar through its window and sees the flashbulb go off. She watches light from the flashbulb spread out in all directions but it doesn't hit the front and back walls of the boxcar simultaneously. Because the boxcar is moving forward, the front wall of the boxcar is moving away from the approaching light while the back wall of the boxcar is moving toward that light. Remarkably, light from the flashbulb strikes the back wall of the boxcar first, as seen by your stationary friend.

Something is odd here: you see the light strike both walls simultaneously while your stationary friend sees light strike the back wall first. Who is right? The answer, strangely enough, is that you're both right. However, because you are moving at different velocities, the two of you perceive time and space somewhat differently. Because of these differences, you and your friend will not always agree about the distances between points in space or the intervals between moments in time. Most importantly, the two of you will not always agree about the distance or time separating two specific events and, in certain cases, may not even agree about which event happened first!

The remainder of the special theory of relativity builds on this groundwork, always treating the speed of light as a fundamental constant of nature. Einstein's famous formula, E=mc2, is an unavoidable consequence of this line of reasoning.

Clear?

[thought for the day] thursday evening

Truth, Sir, is a cow which will yield such people [sceptics] no more milk and so they are gone to milk the bull.

Samuel Johnson [1763]

Don’t know much about this chap. Is he famous or something? Did he have any education worth speaking of? Did any wisdom ever spring from his lips? Enlighten me.

[wordless thursday] captions please

[taking the piss] there must be a reason

We're all agreed about one thing, anyway - the pollies are taking the piss, they're doing it now with impunity and the people don't like it.

The hypocrisy is astounding.

Cameron saying he was 'appalled'. Pardon?

Now look - people don't dare take the piss unless they know they're going to get away with it and this lot really do believe that they're not going to have to face the electorate because of the new regional governance. How else would you explain the gall?