Something which must be addressed

... yet not engaged on for reasons stated below.

When family wishes to engage with us combatively

Being without family now as they died off and/or are scattered to the four winds, I do indeed have 'a family' of sorts and they are not split, mainly because we came together over similar concerns.  However, those with flesh and blood, brainwashed in mind, create a far more stressful position and my heart goes out to them.  I can escape, these people cannot, they're trapped by flesh and blood.

Our possible troll from yesterday, following hard on the heels of the los of function of the blog on Sunday, turns out not to be a troll at all but a genuinely naive member of a family line I know and have great affection for - still now, even now.  This may be hard for some to understand.

It does cause great distress when I must set straight clearly 'not right' statements such as:

You do realize that every single statement there is false, don't you?

Not the slightest back up, as against our more than a year of backup, in painstaking increments, for our statements.  Given that I shall not engage, firstly with close people in an adversarial manner for mental health reasons and secondly, because I fear my own language could be inflammatory, then there must be a strategy, mentioned again near the end of this post.

All the things I've painstakingly explained to readers are as naught in one fell swoop - an example is searches. When I'm told there is nothing there in the search, after having written many times that one must write the correct question in the first place, and given that a person hardwired against truth is never going to do that search properly, then in the vernacular - what is the bleedin' point of engaging when the other party is not even on the same page and not remotely interested in finding out the truth?

Further, as there is but one of me in this body, then I cannot halt the work of the blog in order to deal with that which we have already, many times over, established as wrong or doubtful here - 'we' meaning the contributors and reader comments.  So when this 'close' person complains that I do not 'allow comments', well of course not, goes without saying - the prime directive here is that lies do not stand, so why on earth would i introduce them against the blog's prime directive?  Makes no sense.

Again, this is covered further down.

Searches

On the vaxx and the issue in general:

https://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2021/10/saturday-11.html#more

https://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2021/08/there-is-disingenuous-mendacity-going.html#more

On disingenuous mendacity itself:

https://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2021/08/dont-heed-one-word-of-this-post-all.html#more

Now that's more than enough to establish grounds for doubt and that is all which need be established.  The onus is not on us to prove every last claim, that's the onus upon the medical establishment and govt to justify their invasion of our bodies in this experiment.  

But we have far more than doubt gathered over the past year, we have statements from former employees and doctors, we have charts gathered by Polly in Canada and frontline doctors and people within the epidemiology field, regulars here have seen all those ... the links above are but a few articles and videos over the past year.

And they most clearly establish doubt over the officially given out statements and charts.

https://drmalcolmkendrick.org/

Suppression and strictures

Accompanying the prima facie disingenuous mendacity is behaviour so bizarre by authority, which is the talking point around the world right now, except within Woke circles and all they are doing is the three wise monkeys from the middle of de Nile River.

I have lost my blog more times than you've had marriages, the latest suppression being that posts were simply removed by my host with no explanation, an outrageous thing if they are claiming fair practice.  Recourse in law?  They suggested I take recourse with their legal dept - do they think I'm an idiot?  The miscreant provides the judge to pontificate?  

But what is happening to me is but a side skirmish compared to people I know who have genuinely lost their livelihoods, are on benefits when their whole personae is that of working people, not feckless layabouts, and their hardwired family members have severed relations, not the other way around.  

Now, any Wokist who writes to me under these conditions of undue duress gets short shrift I'm afraid, the more so when he adopts a happy, un-abused, hurt tone to a person currently being abused something awful.

The most galling part is they have the temerity to call me out for being 'combative'.  Given all the above.

The best way with brainwashed 'close people'

If I was able to find those links above via a single search request 'sinopeg', within seconds, then for someone to tell me 'there is nothing' to find is already so hardwired that as Yuri Bezmenov pointed out - further engagement is pointless.  They have been brainwashed by the MSM's championing of false positioning by govt and the medical establishment, positioning we have shown is flawed at best, certainly creating reasonable doubt.

There does come a point where one's own mental health and that of those close to us becomes paramount, overrides any political consideration, and thus I take the stance I do.  

Once more - there is zero point engaging with someone who does precisely what I warned commenters not to do - make bald, unsupported statements, as against our quite supported material.

To attempt to lightly pass off this deeply riven fissure between former friends, colleagues and family is naivety to extremes - it is deeply distressing to us that they would do this.  These are connected people of decades standing who are acting so bizarrely and all I can say, as I always say, is 'Father forgive them, for they know not what they do.'

The political implications

These are not even secret - the splitting of all institutions of state, the breaking up of families along spurious lines, over ideological constructs, the creation of an atmosphere of civil war, though in this case a cyberwar at this point  - and it is all orchestrated, the lot of it, as Senator Jenner stated on the Senate floor in 1954, as those who died in 'accidents' and plane crashes within a couple of years also publicly said.

And by 'orchestrated', that means that the wheels are set in motion following the indoctrination and the apparatchiks are in place - ordinary friends and family - who themselves do the dirty part of the job, quite unwittingly.

There are two ways to come at this - first to read a summary of Marx again - the five stages of which we are are now in the fourth ... and the Christian observation that if one abandons one's Maker, then just what do you think pours in to take its place?  A big nothing?

Lastly, the Cromwell position

Yes, he did ask those opposed to consider that they may be in error and yes, we are asking similar now.  But what if the Senator quoted yesterday was wrong on every single statement?  This is a Senator, not just teenage Mary on her keyboard at home.  Senators are in the public eye and if they make statements contrary to the narrative, then the govt can sue them, can it not?

Thus we wait and see how this one unfolds while other things come pouring in to address.  And in the pleasure of this temporary unwonted removal of this blogger from the fray, causing me to be late with my first real post of the day, I really am neglecting my work for the day.  You have a good Tuesday.