Wednesday [2 to 5]

5.  Thoughts on a comment at Vox's

The commenter asked who would be Pres if Biden was removed. Of course, it is Harris first, then Pelosi.

Ah, you point out to me - neither. If it were clear that fraud had occurred and the election was overturned, shirley the Donald becomes Pres again?

For a start, the DemRats were able to steal an election with the ultimate chutzpah, with the collusion of the money and all relevant forces - they will fall back on the provisions for conducting a federal election - namely Harris, then Pelosi - and point to a "revolution” taking place to overcome constitutional provisions in order to "usurp" power from the rightful Harris, then Pelosi.  There is no way they would ever concede the election because that results in incarceration and/or lethal injections for Them.

I'm with Steve and Vox in hoping it does done right but we also know the DemRats and the global forces behind them.  There's a "Global Reset" going on after all.

4.  Snippets

a.  Praying Medic, an online warrior pastor

Dear Arizona Senators:

In the minds of Arizonans, you have only one job between now and the next time your name is on the ballot—and that is to fix our broken election system.

If you succeed, you won't need to bother fund-raising. We'll gladly re-elect you.

If you fail, all the donations in the world won't help you get re-elected.

You have a choice:

Adjourn, go home, and raise money for your next election...

Or stay in session and fix the problem you created.

Choose wisely.

~ An Arizona voter

b.  Lauren Witzke:

Two arrests made at a Virginia school board meeting after it was declared an unlawful assembly because parents protesting critical race theory and transgender policy refused to leave.

Parents who oppose exposing their children to anti-White and pro-pedophilia propaganda will soon find themselves on the No Fly list.

c.  Burma [Gab/Yahoo]:

Armed rebels have declared war on the Myanmar junta, and the country is gearing up for all-out urban warfare

d.   Gab news again:

Trump Says He Is "Very Disappointed" with Kavanaugh and Amy Coney Barrett Votes to Uphold Obamacare

e.  Vox Day:

http://voxday.blogspot.com/2021/06/its-not-over.html

[We knew it, we've seen it corroborated, here it is again:]

Something appears to be up. What, exactly, I don't know, but the Chinese are very quiet, the Russians are being openly scornful of the Fake President, and the European governments are either falling, preparing to be ousted, or distancing themselves from the USA. 

So the Swedish socialists and the Swedish nationalists are cooperating. Now isn't that just a fascinating combination?

3.  Ripper

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/breaking-recordings-of-moderna-representative-making-horrific-admission-about-jab_FGoN22NpqUvwTJ7.html

[Meanwhile:]

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/039-i-039-ll-see-you-in-court-039-van-tam-interrogated-has-nothing-to-say-hugo-talks-lockdo_asBv3F1ds9OClh6.html

[Thanks for those three at 05:12, Ripper.]

2.  Thinking of Ripper at 05:12 BST

These knights are the kindest, bravest, warmest, most wonderful human beings I've ever known in my life.

Going to bring various elements together here, yet fail to rumble it, deliberately.  This was written by a pastor from the mountains: <"To conceal truth: Jesus explained, “Therefore I speak to them in parables, because seeing they do not see, and hearing they do not hear, nor do they understand. And in them the prophecy of Isaiah is fulfilled, which says: ‘Hearing you will hear and shall not understand, and seeing you will see and not perceive’” (Mt. 13:13-14). Not everyone was intended to understand [the] message. He skillfully used parables to throw curve balls and confuse those who were not open to truth.>

Moving on, I do suggest to all that the days of presenting "game, set and match" conclusive proof is long gone, if it were ever possible ... because life does not work that way.  Consider why Jesus spoke in parables. Answer is dead simple - he had to. Right where He was with every public utterance, there were the agents of the very whited sepulchre.  Though He may have been largely as claimed and therefore could have used supernatural ways to circumvent trouble, yet he lived as a man.  Therefore, there had to be a way or ways to be able to continue His mission until that dark hour in the garden.

An alternative way is to look at comedian John Clarke, the NZer in Oz and thus it's understandable his attitude towards the Chappells.  In one of his sketches, he mentioned [something like this, I recall] that the only way to get Chappell G out was to take out the middle stump, wrap it and deposit it in the changing rooms in the pavilion.  In other words, you'll never have final proof, you will only ever have fragmented snippets, while the majority will have two feet stuck in a river in Egypt, chanting "conspiracy theory".  In fact, that in itself is the best defence pundits on a mission have, the parable being the second.

In plainspeak, I know certain knights and moved in circles which might surprise at one stage in my life.  Therefore, if you wish to know about such things, the onus is on you getting off your backside. At the same time, incredulity is a mighty defence, not for the incredulous [it's a sentence of incremental death] but for those observed. And an even better defence is where the over-eager join too many dots at one time on behalf of the intellectually lazy.  Svali had things to say about that.  If I presented, say, a post about Denver and seven points turned out right, two incorrect and one bamboozling, it's the bamboozling one which needs pursuing. The best detective fiction vigorously underscores that point - Holmes and Poirot both had to go back to square one quite a few times.

Are sleuths nice people?  Might they not be controlled dissidents, essentially lacking human warmth?  The approach is obviously to glance down the track record, the voting record or in Jesus of Nazareth's terms - observe the fruits. Which track record?  Toodles mentions a neighbour's hubby who had medicos in the family, he "researched" and said everything was safe with the vaxxes. Really?  On his say-so, using his official sources, he declares it safe?  I don't like this woman in the video but at the same time, I understand that a nice, sweet girl is not going to get the same results she does.