Wednesday [6]

6.  The civil wars are just beginning

Despite deep provocation by cabal agents-provocateurs, including MSM and soc-med plants, e.g. Gatestone, realpolitik says that you and I in our corner of soc-med are not going to be influencing more than a few thousand people and even then, we don't agree on all things.

However, if a thousand of you do that, then who's to say whether it could become significant because you go to various sites and comment there as well.  This below, at Breitbart, is part of the provocation, not just reportage - the Mullahs and Imams add to it from their side.

https://www.breitbart.com/middle-east/2021/05/11/watch-arab-citizens-attack-jewish-neighbors-synagogues-in-pogrom-in-israel/

The one I looked at in some detail, long ago, was Kissinger [hardly the "quiet" American],  in Rwanda, also in Vietnam and Laos.  Then there was the UN in Darfur.  Lesson learned is pretty clear and it doesn't need Graham Greene to tell it to us.

I've felt for some time that ruining women is part of the game plan, not just turning them into useless, insane SJWs and hook-up hoes, or into smug, luv-all innocents abroad who get what happened in Morocco ... but also to snuff out one of women's prime roles - as keepers of the old ways or being more for peace perhaps to protect their families.

And the obvious thought is of Ireland and the Fenians - the peace train, remember that?  If women decided, en masse, not to give nooky to their men until the men dropped their murder inc. mentality, I'd suggest, Coriolanus-like, that that's a pretty powerful motivation.

Or would have been.  

Because the hook-up, poly-amory, whoring around culture removes from women the bargaining chip of being able to say yes or no. In the long run, women gain nothing from it, it is disempowering for them, not the opposite.  Men just go to the nearest post-Millennial slapper for their rocks.  And women not much better because there are countless men who would with any of them.

What I'm getting at is that if that factor is removed - the power of women to personally influence - added to the failure of Christianity to influence now that it's been killed off by the cabal through the new godless, then it's full steam ahead for the communist takeover, n'est-ce-pas?  What on earth is going to stop this juggernaut?

Therefore we need to consider our positions, before their positions out there swamp us.  People swing wildly, like that canal boat, from the blue side to the red side and back to the blue side - to them, there are no other colours to vote for and all they're doing is giving those like Johnson carte-blanche to act against them.

Realpolitik - we can rail against it, rent our garments like a version of King Lear, or we can be a bit smarter.  Yet being smarter is also factored in by Them [the cabal].  Them know no one wants to bell the cat, no one wants any trouble, no one really wants civil war [well except for maybe 10%] and Them play on that.  

Or people like me - saying to go the non-cooperation route because if you go too early the way they've engineered, they're in place to pick you off due to our inability to form a stampede, as herdless cats - they've factored in people such as many of you, plus myself as well.

In fact, it's a jolly jape to Them, setting the sanguine red blooded among us upon over-thinkers such as me.  Divide and rule.  I'm not saying don't act, just act wise and it also helps to have a Farage type to lead the charge, providing he's the real thing and won't sell out at the 11th hour.