Thursday [1 to 4]

4.  So let's kick this off today with this lady replayed

https://brandnewtube.com/watch/human-rights-attorney-gives-3-min-of-vax-covid-jaw-dropping-truth_SIoTFLCDYJgdTC9.html

There is some hard data in there to note at breakneck speed, the rest is its encasing.

3.  The current rationale concerning the workings of this blog

... as she is right now.  Main point here is to understand the nature of trolling and infiltrating. In eschatology, false prophets and witnesses abound, such that they fool the very elect, whoever that lot are.  Never is this more so than on our side of world affairs and politics - we have varying degrees of eccentricity and loonery on our side, from Icke to me and a rational mind will look at the particular offering and conclude:

a.  The pundit has his own barrows to push;

b.  He is in a state of flux vis-a-vis compost mentis;

c.  He does present much truth, in among the 'embellishment' - it is fallacious to conclude that because, for example, Colin Ross went on to speak on things quite left field, a bit iffy to my mind, that that negated the things about world psychiatry which he did come out with, inc. drugs, hypnosis, the start of AIDS, the start of Covid etc.

The maddening truth is that many dots CAN be connected quite legitimately, despite the mind's rebellion against joining them, whilst some joined dots are stretching it. Has the reader the background to decide that or is he reliant on professional 'don't do conspiracy theory' trolls who seem oh so rational and high on the first page of google rankings or Wiki, against a hysterical, for example, woman?

And given that some of the finest whistleblowers are women, it does take a rational mind to decide, for him/herself, how far it can be taken, how far not.  There's a real mix of truth, speculation and trollery going on 24/7 in every fiery damsel.  Please bear that in mind throughout today.  Don't just dismiss but also be circumspect on every point, should you be in that general area of belief. Goes for men too but we have a few women presenting things today.

2.  Supreme Court’s four times dereliction of duty

https://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2021/04/supreme_courts_failures_are_putting_america_on_a_path_to_tyranny.html

a.  Only a few weeks ago, without offering any substantive explanation, the Court summarily refused to even look at — much less seriously consider — any of the evidence of the 2020 election irregularities offered by attorney Sidney Powell and others. 

b.  At the same time, the Court was also apparently too busy to halt a New York prosecutor from obtaining former president Trump's tax returns.

c.  Two weeks later, the Supreme Court — again without explanation — summarily refused to reverse the D.C. Circuit Court of Appeals' denial of Judicial Watch's request that it be allowed to take the deposition of a member of this country's ruling political elite — Hillary Rodham Clinton.

d.  Then this week, SCOTUS put the final nail in the coffin containing the GOP's 2020 election disputes with its denial of a petition for a writ of certiorari in Bognet v. Dagraffenreid.  Again, it refused to rule on whether a state's courts are qualified or not under Article 2, Section 1, Clause 2 of the Constitution to modify that state's presidential election laws.

1.  The current rationale concerning the future of this blog

The rationale of the blog is that if we have the material - and that depends not only on me but on sources coming through - then my job is to present from trusted sources, with or without comment.

There is always info overload for the reader and even more for the collator who has it coming through at a rate where he has to work at speed.

Which becomes more and more difficult with time because:

a. Big tech's intrusion in the way Twitter has now intruded, plus govt intervention over peripheral RL issues which drag a pundit away, even to the extent of heavying hosts, which is then revisited upon the pundit;

b. Health issues including slow loss of memory/capacity in my case, which I'm monitoring while I still can and health threats, once again mainly from those in point a.  This is today's and tomorrow's issue for me.

c.  Straight tech issues such as my ipad and laptop, both which are slowly packing up and going down, freezing etc. but money is not freely available.  There is one more device left after these go down but there is a limit and an uncertain solution due to Big tech changing the rules of the game on every new device and piece of software.

The cumulative effect of all of the above is that any one item can kill off this blog at any second, in the way NOUK was killed off and NOdotcom before it, together with the current Block madness on NOWPdot com.  I'm asking readers to recognise reality - things DO end, the question is when.  

It just needs one or two of these above to kick in at the same time - and it's not if but when, I can't be more specific.  The tale of the lamented Chuckles is a perfect case, combined with I think it was Nancy Mitford [will have to check] who said it's like a headless chicken - it might run around in a quite lively manner for some time ... but it is in fact ... dead.

Please, reader, be aware that all this has a better than even chance of stopping this blog at any moment, esp. tomorrow afternoon.  It's not sackcloth and ashes stuff, it's reality and I'd hope and expect that someone among us will take up the baton and run with it, obviously with his/her own spin and redaction.  it might last another year, it might be tomorrow - it's in the lap of the one God.