Thursday, June 18, 2009

[ten banks] chutzpah as an art form


All of us are angry at having the p--s taken out of us these days. This, however, makes me very, very, very angry:

Part 1
Ever since the government gave the O.K. for 10 big banks to pay back the bailout funds, the firms have been rushing to return the money. But that doesn’t mean they’ll be off the government dole anytime soon. Last week, 10 big banks got the blessing from the U.S. to exit the Troubled Asset Relief Program, the rescue fund under which scores of banks got federal funds.

Just days later, banks are giving back the money. Morgan Stanley and J.P. Morgan have returned $10 billion; US Bancorp $6.6 billion; and BB&T $3.1 billion. Goldman Sachs says it’s ready to repay the money, as well. In all, the 10 banks are expected to return some $68 billion.
So, let's analyse this but not with economic stats. The banks were bailed out. This meant that without this money, they would have gone to the wall and the economy as we know it would have collapsed, right? Now, in a short space of time, what is apparent is that their liquidity supposedly dried up, having stashed the cash into other areas. Now they pay back the loans in full.

How?

Well, they realized assets, didn't they? Assets they'd had all along. So all this talk of expensive TARP is so much hogwash because the simple bottom line is that they actually had the reserves in the beginning, saw the chance of a big handout from the government, took it but now see no further need to continue the charade.

This is the historic Morgan octopus's game. The current game is a variant - they wish to control the government, not be beholden to it. It was always to be this way.

Where did the money come from? From the American taxpayer, of course, those in the bankruptcy queues. What state is the American taxpayer currently in to support cheating banks? Now, if an individual had been up to this creative accounting, in order to secure a loan, what would happen to him?

Part 2

A Democratic president, of course, would be all for ripping off the banks and redistributing it to the common people, wouldn't he? Isn't that what socialism is? Taking from the rich to give to the poor? Well, all right - at least letting the poor go away to lick their wounds.

Er ... no:
This summer, President Obama is calling on all of us – young and old, from every background, all across this country – to participate in our nation’s recovery and renewal by serving in our communities. From June 22 to September 11, United We Serve will begin to engage Americans from coast to coast in addressing community needs in education, health, energy and the environment, and community renewal. Serve.gov is your online resource for not only finding volunteer opportunities in your community, but also creating your own.
Hang on one moment. A people desperate for their steady jobs not to disappear, cynically played around with by the very people who had Obama elected [Morgans, CFR et al], are now being asked by him to volunteer through the summer for the good of the You Ess of Ay, to selflessly give for the good of the country as the dollar is about to be by-passed by another currency, plunging the nation into chaos.


Quiz question - which party's supporters would be more likely to accede to Obama's request, thereby showing themselves to be True Apple Pie Patriots? And what of the other side who point out what they think of Obama's idea? Oh, they're cast in the role of villain of course.

Part 3

There is a Jewish word 'chutzpah'. Here is the Wiki definition:
The word derives from the Hebrew word ḥuṣpâ (חֻצְפָּה), meaning "insolence", "audacity", and "impertinence." In Hebrew, chutzpah is used indignantly, to describe someone who has over-stepped the boundaries of accepted behavior with no shame.
Which is more galling to you - the situation you find yourselves in or the way it has been played by your non-President? There are many words to describe my feelings on the pollies and those behind them.

'Kill' is one of those words, in a completely hypothetical way, of course. Just letting off steam on a blog, you understand.

In a country still maintaining freer gun laws, I wonder if 58 East 68th Street, 1600 Pennsylvania Ave or 1585 Broadway are at all worried about the people of the United States and what they might do?

Part 4

If you're not doing anything much in the next few years, particularly if you've just gone to the wall, you might like to pop along to JPMorgan Chase or Morgan Stanley and have a chat to Martine Bond about the situation America's in. A couple of million people should be sufficient to make the point.

10 comments:

  1. The banks thought they had found a source of free money so they rushed along with their hands out to grab what they could.

    They then read the fine print and discovered the cost was they were giving up control.

    Time to get out of debt and gain control back so lets bite the bullet and pay back the money. Money they were given and didn't have to realise any assets for anyway. They didn't have to realise many assets, if any, because if I go to a bank and take 100 out and not spend it. Then I can return it easy enough.

    Government miffed because they thought they had the banks by the short and curlies and all the control. Banks miffed because their easy money dried up and they have put themselves in a difficult situation. We are miffed because most banks were never in trouble really and our incompetent governments had no idea.

    Socialists also need slaves. People to do the work for minimum wages.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Superficial gets nowhere.

    Good bloggers sort it out.

    The more bloggers sort it out, the more pressure will mount to close/monitor, etc, the internet, and/or, more statistics will not be published.

    Step one. Massive media releases internationally concerning green shoots.

    Controlled purchases in the futures

    Controlled interventions in supposedly "free markets".

    Trade off: Between a long yield around 4.5%ish to aid mortgage markets and a declining $ due to QE and market fears of future inflation. The 2 are incompatible.

    Last september, after the concerted margin calls that triggered a higher $ as various carry trades were reversed, and caused commodity and equity markets declines, Bernanke deliberately crashed the equities market be a deliberate drain of 100s of $billions of liquidity from the markets. Well known names went to the wall. Bernanke had lost control and had to open all sorts of liquidity windows.

    The Tarp repayments are a deliberate repeat of the drains of last September, disguised as tarp repayments to a great fanfare to show how solid the recipient banks are. A $70Bish drain.

    The rest is coming from not rolling over in "Slosh funds" a further few $billions. The $70B caused the US and world indices to fall earlier this week, and todays failure to roll over will probably be reflected either tomorrow (Friday), or Mon, Tues, coming.
    Cont'd

    ReplyDelete
  3. part 2


    Denninger has the story as follows:-




    Here

    and he raised the alarm

    Here

    This first raised his curiosity.

    Here

    Most gov't statistics in the US and UK are fraudulent to some degree, never more so than recently. These have been used with extravagance by the authorities on both sides of the pond.

    Cont'd

    ReplyDelete
  4. I've mentioned Zero Hedge before. They really are good.

    So understand this!!!

    You must understand that the Fed, its local branches, and for the most part, the Primary Dealers, regard themselves as being a separate nation to that of the rest of the US. Their survival comes first. This is true to varying degrees for all independent central fiat banks. They meet internationally, in secret, and discuss, in secret, set agendas, in secret, ............., they truly do believe they are a superior species. They hold little allegiance to their mother countries, except in so far as not to jeopardize their own existence by upsetting politicians.
    Given their members membership of CFR, TC, BB, BIS, UN, etc, they are convinced that a world ruled by fiat bankers would be beneficial, mainly to them. Being a separate species, they care little for the majority of humanity. They will compete compellingly at some point in the future, with politicians for that privilege. We have spoken at length on this in the past.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Part 4 of 4.

    In the US, the CFR/Fed in spite of past shortcomings

    As detailed here

    They have executed a further

    Power-Grab

    Remember, the unlimited issuance of debt has limitations. It is incompatible in the long term with low interest rates, as foreign investors will fear a devalued $ and demand higher interest rates before they will purchase the debt. The Fed must therefor buy more and more Tbills.
    I discussed this in the multipart article.

    The problem then becomes a viable exit strategy that smoothly withdraws excess liquidity without crashing the market, while containing gold, and convincing foreign investors to take lower interest rates.

    And all this while BRIC and other nations are shedding $ debt, (last month China was a net disposer of the $)

    You got to be a good juggler these days.

    Sorry to be brief, ... time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. James.
    1)Please check the links, they should work, - they do for me.

    2)I had to post the above in sections as blogger was rejecting the whole article as being beyond its character html limits.

    Makes no sense to me, but maybe you know about it.

    Get well soon.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Finally.

    Concerning the bankers vs politicians.

    You can see this vividly in the differing script being played out in the EU compared to the US.
    The EU are determined to castrate the City, and the Mayfair hedge funds, - they are both vital to the UK GDP.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Thanks, Lord T. Have to agree.

    Sonus - all work. Now to read.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.