Monday, April 14, 2008

[patriotism] can it accommodate conscience


Elvis Presley sang:

Suspicion torments my heart, Suspicion keeps us apart, Suspicion why torture me.

Afraid I, for one, am very suspicious of these snippets:

The rapid rise in food prices could push 100m people in poor countries deeper into poverty, the head of the World Bank, Robert Zoellick, has said.

He said the World Bank was working to provide money for seeds for planting in the new season.
Mr Zoellick's "New Deal for Global Food Policy" also seeks to boost agricultural policy in poor countries in the longer-term. "

As we know, learning from the past, those kind of questions sometimes end in war," he said.

... and can't help trying to sort out in the head what the long term aim is. I think we have it in "global food policy" and "war". Whenever groups like the World Bank, the UN or NATO get involved, trouble usually ensues. It's the Kissinger Syndrome - wherever he visited, e.g. Rwanda, SE Asia, unnecessary trouble followed.

Henry Kissinger was quoted in the book “Kiss the Boys Goodbye", written by a Vietnam Vet.

"Military men are just dumb stupid animals to be used as pawns in foreign policy.”

Quite frankly, I have problems with material like that. As ex-military myself, sharing beliefs with such people as Steve Green and James Cleverly on the military, a check of my "About" reveals a man who believes in G-d, Queen and country.

That's how I was brought up. That's how I did my service.

In later years though I began to discover what the Kissingers of the world were really up to and though I have little time for Ellsberg as a person, he did open up our eyes. Now what are we going to do? Are we going to ignore what we now know to be true?

This is tough for a Neocon who supports his country's forces wherever they are - do you think I don't? Do you think I'm not furious the way our troops are treated? And look at this, from a Canadian, Halls of Macadamia:

The once mighty British Empire has fallen... you need go no further than this...

They serve the same Queen, fight the same foe and lay down their lives with equal valour and sacrifice. But when the fallen heroes of Canada and Britain come home, the welcome is very different.

I really urge you to click on that link and follow it down. Now read what James Cleverly said here:

I felt almost sick reading this blog post in the Telegraph about the breakdown in relationship between the British military and local Iraqi forces.
The short-termism in Gordon Brown's government has created a situation where the troops in Iraq can no longer do their job but are still at risk from daily attacks.

A typical comment on that article was by one Chris H:

With New Labour we have had a government that both despises military and knows next to nothing about it. Despite this, the government has engaged in a series of military adventures with little thought for the consequences and no desire to take responsibility or to support the troops.

Now I'm quite conscious that Verlin Martin, a Neocon, sees me as some sort of Truther and therefore as a kooky lefty but what do you do, Verlin, when you can't trust the people in charge up top? What do you do when prima facie indicates they've acted in a pretty shabby way?

What do you do when regular forces top brass come out with statements about the leadership?

Hey, I get a little hot under the collar and start calling these politicians traitors.
I don't trust these bstds as far as I can kick them and they sure as hell don't give a damn about the forces at their command.

Eaton, Zinni and company
- are they the traitors for drawing attention to this thing?

Lt Gen Dannart - was he wrong to butt in and say enough is enough?

13 comments:

  1. I was watching the news last night with my wife. There was a report on the rise in food commodity prices where three reasons where given. I found it interesting that while each were true they were not the bulk of the reason for the inflationary bubble.

    The current rise in basic commodities is largely being caused by speculative market pressures, and where is the collateral for this investment coming? Two sources. This is capital fleeing equities and derivative markets combined with cash flows sourced from central banks. Yes that's right, tax payer's money intended to ease liquidity is being used to starve the poor and ferment unrest. Sometimes its hard not to come to the conclusion that there is a conspiracy afoot - n'est pas?

    ReplyDelete
  2. Let's step back a bit and try to see if it could be anything else. There most certainly seems to be an agenda in this though. I can't see what else it could be.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Are you really a NeoCon in the Straussian sense? If so, then you will believe in conspiracy as a positive and necessary part of maintaining western society. Dishonesty, indirection and "esoteric" (=dishonest) language are necessary methods for the enlightened elite to rule the sentimental masses.

    I suspect you are actually an honest conservative. The genuine conservative kicks against the "moderniser" who destroys the old for the sake of the new.

    Many conservatives, like myself, hate the way in which our armed forces have been abused in the modernists' adventures to make the world in their image in Afghanistan, Iraq and the Balkans.

    Our personnel have been placed in the dilemma where either conscience or patriotism must be abandoned.

    True conservatives who believe in truth should reject NeoCon ideology which is profoundly cynical and creates this impossible opposition of love of country against morality.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Semper - it wasn't expressed well in the post but I thought Neocons would see me as lefty but I answer to the epithet classical conservative.

    I agree with your sentiments.

    ReplyDelete
  5. I agree with your sentiments regarding the absolutely terrible treatment of our armed forces. The great efforts the British forces have carried out over the last few years in Basra have been phenomenal but are now being poured down the drain.

    I disagree with Semper's line of thinking. It's not so much about trying to set Afghanistan and Iraq into little Americas but rather the stopping of Islamist ideology spreading worldwide and impacting on the West in the form of terrorism. You can call the Iraq invasion idealistic and morally bankrupt but what is your solution to dictatorships and terrorism? Let them be? If so we are then creating the opposition you mentioned, of patriotism against morality, by hollowing out our very own foundations.

    ReplyDelete
  6. & they also mess with the supply of equipment and training leaving the troops more vulnerable!

    ReplyDelete
  7. Must agree with Beaman. And let's just cut to it shall we?

    Is there truly ANY reason tolerate these little rats nests that tend to act out against any democracy in weapons range?

    That tend to torment their own people and their neighbours? That are always rocket rich and have an amazing magical ability to sprout up resistence movements and militias in innocent civie heavy areas?

    In a age of fully crunk caliphates and WMD's putting up with intolerant, illegitimate regimes many with pitiful literacy rates and an amazing ability to collect foreign aid - while treating their women horrifically will be a very tough sale in the new millenium.

    Better to knock them out - ALL the way out now.

    Like Maddie Albright semi said - "What's the point of having this 30 years in the future military if we can't annihilate Hitlerian regimes, their fanboys and miliitas?"

    PS Semaj - congrats on the blog of the day at Last of the Few!!!

    ReplyDelete
  8. James: you are a truther because you upheld RuPaul and you continue to question EVERY government answer :) (except for the fact that you can't muster any questioning for man-made hysteria..uhh climate change)

    Food prices: look to global warming (tm) for your answer there.

    People are scared that food will be more scarce, so commodities will rise (futures); also since we have the 'man-made' global warming scare, alt-fuel is being made out of... FOOD, hence driving up prices.

    Not to sound to open market, but 100 million in poverty out of 6,000,000,000 (billion) seems like a number that would be about right in a market economy (even on the low scale..about 1.7%, the US economy has a ~12% poverty rate)

    ReplyDelete
  9. btw James; truthers aren't necessarily left or right, there are those of both stripes in that camp :)

    and what definition of 'neocon' are you labeling me with? (new conservative? I've been a con since I knew what politics was)

    ReplyDelete
  10. Lord Nazh, even our own mutual friend Courtney, who posts on your site, agrees with me here:

    And by the way, we Pennsylvanians who cling to our religion do so because we know that NO politician has all the answers.

    Will you not at least agree with her point that the politicians cannot be wholly trusted?

    ReplyDelete
  11. Courtney, thanks and there's another longish one coming on April 25th, Australia's day.

    ReplyDelete
  12. wow, you'll have to show me the email where court agreed with you James :)

    It sure wasn't in the comment she left.

    ReplyDelete
  13. James: I don't trust ANY politician ;) but I don't look for cooky conspiracies in everything that happens either.

    Court has a mind of her own, she's free to post as she pleases and doesn't have to agree with me on anything.

    But I think you're reading wrong (again) if you think she's on your side in this one.

    I give you the reason(s) for the food prices (borne out in the press no less) and you ignore that completely to fall on courtney and whether she agrees with you or not :) Her agreement or disagreement wouldn't affect my say in this debate at all.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.