I was trying to write a happy Sunday post when I came across this. This is the cynicism of these people, of whom Greenspan is one of the worst:
"I am saddened that it is politically inconvenient to acknowledge what everyone knows: the
So the smart thinkers, having been leaked enough morsels three years ago that this was what it was all about, now feel vindicated, the anti-war mob are vindicated and everyone swiftly passes over the real reason - that it's about the intra-continental agenda for the next five years.
Abu Ghraib was just a sniff of the true state of affairs, the kill militsias were another. It was certainly oil in part but this arch cynic is only stating what everyone knows. He doesn't state what most people don't know [because they're looking in the wrong direction] that there is a whole other agenda in the
I'm not going to say another word because those who know won't speak up and those who don't see it wouldn't believe it. Sorry but these lowlifes really get under the skin with their arrogant mocking of the common man. I refuse to share their opinion .
Why didn't he say it before?
ReplyDeleteSo, you're saying it's all not about oil. Is it about Iran in that case? China? Why don't you tell us?
ReplyDeleteWelshcakes - precisely. I could easily have taken his comment and asked a series of whys but it depressed me too much. I plan to do it this evening.
ReplyDeleteMatt - has it occurred to you, old son, that I might be a little wary of naming them? I'll e-mail you.
a 7 million dollar advance can get people to say many things, especially when your spouse is a journalist for MSNBC
ReplyDeleteMultiple causes
threat to world security
iran
threat of wmd
terrorist sanctuary
saddam responsible for the deaths of 2 million plus people
ran a terrorist state
fed inaccurate intelligence
to name a few
there is never "one" cause
Anonymous - your identity and your English might be questionable but your logic is unquestioned.
ReplyDelete