Thursday, August 09, 2007

[watch carefully] don't be lulled

Lord Nazh, he of the Longshanks' diluted blood and womanizer of royalty, has consistently said the American people wouldn't buy it and there'd be insurrection; Beach Girl said it was already underway.

What are we referring to? To the CFR plan to merge Mexico, Canada and the United States into one state, the Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America, controlled by the NAAC [the CFR, in other words]. Details for those born on Mars are here. As you can see, it's already a done deal with the three Presidents agreeing to it on March 23rd, 2005.

One of the main whistleblowers, Matt of Buckeye Thoughts, now says this:
We're trying to figure out what the hell to do to stop the NAU but as I was telling my best friend (to whom I lent the Corsi book today), it's not going to happen. Sure, they might be able to get some stuff in but the "Grand Compromise" failure was the nail in the coffin.

No American will stand for it!

That was the first time I can remember in my twenty years of life on this planet of an issue touching such a raw nerve with the American public. If any politician tries this (in secret or in open, it's starting to get out, btw, slowly but surely), they will get smited so fast they won't be able to blink.

It might look like we're going down from the outside, but Corsi's book is starting to make a splash. People are starting to learn the truth. The US, Canada, and Mexico will stay sovereign. The citizens of each country will see to it, peacefully. If our gov'ts refuse to listen to us, then force will be used and they will listen.

Count on it!

Now I don't give a damn about being wrong. Don't you know I'm praying to be wrong and Lord Nazh right? Don't you see that I was pushing the issue ad nauseam just to bring it to the public eye, over our way.

Dear Matt and Lord Nazh - don't you boys realize the thing will be done surreptitiously, slice by slice, under different names, never becoming a constitutional issue, never becoming an issue before the election, only after?

I don't think you boys have cottoned on yet to the amazing persistence of these people. Look one more time at Senator Jenning's comment before the U.S. Senate on February 23rd, 1954:
The important point to remember about this group is not its ideology but its organization. It is a dynamic, aggressive, elite corps, forcing its way through every opening, to make a breach for a collectivist one-party state. It operates secretly, silently, continuously to transform our Government without our suspecting the change is underway.
The Security and Prosperity Partnership of North America is not even a new idea:

October 28, 1939 - John Foster Dulles [later U.S. Secretary of State] proposes that America lead the transition to a new order of less independent, semi-sovereign states bound together by a league or federal union.

The key words were "without our suspecting the change is underway". You're not even going to know it's happened. You guys are much closer to the action than I and you are Americans after all and I'm not. That gives you way more authority than me to write on this.

And yet ... and yet ...

10 comments:

  1. James,

    I've just come from here:

    http://realitycheck.typepad.com/commentary_news/

    worth a look if you haven't been before.

    The article 'The Plan to Disappear Canada' is precisely the salami slicing you refer to.

    They seem to be speeding up what with their demands that the EU non-constitution be rubber stamped and the NUA is now a matter of urgency (oops, sorry, national security).

    STB.

    ReplyDelete
  2. If they did this, would the US have to open its borders to Mexicans?

    ReplyDelete
  3. Welshcakes - read the CFR document pdf. It is very much part of the plan.

    "Its boundaries will be defined by a common external tariff and an outer
    security perimeter within which the movement of people, products,
    and capital will be legal, orderly, and safe."

    "there is a
    shared recognition that the three countries can and should act quickly
    inwaysthatwouldmakearealdifferenceinimprovingthecompetitive-
    ness of firms and individuals in North America"

    p28 Progress on security, for example, will
    allow a more open border for the movement of goods and people;
    progressonregulatorymatterswillreducetheneedforactivecustoms
    administration and release resources to boost security.

    Amd so on and so on.

    Yes indeed, Welshcakes, that is what has been agreed in March, 2005, as they themselves stated at their own site.

    ReplyDelete
  4. The tactics used to acheive this are bad, but are Foster Dulles' stated aims?

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well I won't belive it until I see it; not too say it ain't true seeing the links, but still CFR are a bunch of right weirdo's as I am sure we would all agree.

    Why would anyone in Canada or the US vote for this. The Canadians are proud of their history and culture and won't willingly accept sublimation. Still, would be fun to watch.

    if it does happen then I will declare JH a god and follow him as my new Ron Hubbard until the end of time.

    ReplyDelete
  6. I still think James is a lunatical conspiracy theorist, but I like him.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Well why is the USA building that whacking great fence to keep out the Mexicans? Nor do they trust the Canadians to keep the borders safe and they blame us for some of the 9/11 terrorists getting into their country.
    Nor have the Canadians ever forgotten the soft wood lumber dispute where the USA clearly violated the Free Trade Agreement but the USA refused to acknowledge and the final resolution once again screwed the Canadians.
    As CU says, I'll believe it when I see it.

    ReplyDelete
  8. To the last three august personages - duplicity. Take Arnie's big stance against gays but a gay site I read earlier said that apart from the A prefixed bill which was shot down, there were four others which went through. This is duplicity and is a key characteristic of these people.

    ReplyDelete
  9. James,
    I do realize that they're planning to do it, piece by piece. That was one of the main points in Corsi's book. He explained how the EU was created and how CFR, backed by Bush, Harper, and Calderon, are planning the same thing. I should've clarified my comment that you used in this post. Congress is starting to become more vigilant, in and of itself. For instance, many of the "Grand Compromise" pieces were being put in other bills, since Kennedy, Graham, et al. realized they can't do it all at once. Our representatives our listening to us. Bush can try to integrate us by January 1, 2009 but more time will be required (a few years, at the minimum). I have a feeling this will be the sleeper issue of the '08 election.

    ReplyDelete
  10. True,
    We are much closer to the action. The problem is they're doing this behind closed doors. The media is too busy dealing with Afghanistan, Iraq, and domestic issues (like here in Indy, a family just lost its third member to street violence in the past nine years) to a) care, b) know, or c) openly fight against the SPP. Texas seems to be the main battleground, as that's where the NAFTA superhighway is currently under construction. Once I get settled back up at school, a few letters to my elected representatives will be in order. I'll ppost the templates on my blog for all those who wish to do the same.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.