Saturday, August 18, 2007

[fred thompson] iowa move - an indicator

CityUnslicker , he of the bouncing baby son, is a member of the financial community and therefore not given to wild speculation on matters such as those presented below:

Well I won't believe it until I see it; not too say it ain't true seeing the links, but still CFR are a bunch of right weirdo's as I am sure we would all agree.
A fair statement and thus, in the interests of accuracy, I invite readers to point out, using only statistics and neutral documentation, as distinct from rhetoric, where there are any actual errors of fact in the following article.


Thank you:

Non-visible member of the Council on Foreign Relations and Visiting Fellow with the American Enterprise Institute, specializing in national security and intelligence and therefore approved and perfectly placed chosen son to push the agenda for the emasculation of the U.S.A., Fred Thompson, should not be dismissed from speculation:

… after a less-than-stellar summer marked by a campaign staff shake-up, reports of lobbying for a family planning group and fundraising that failed to meet expectations …

He did the minimum required:

Unlike Democrat Barak Obama, who a day earlier plunged into crowds and eagerly sought out state fairgoers, Thompson raced through the jam-packed fair, stopping only to shake hands and chat with people who recognized and stopped him.

… after all, who's interested in the little people? Instead, he deals with those who count and the issues which count:

The man who spent some 20 years as a Washington lobbyist also proclaimed himself the only candidate willing to deal with what he sees as a looming fiscal crisis for the nation.

As a CFR, he would know precisely what's coming and this statement places him way ahead of Obama and Giuliani but neck and neck with the Lizard Queen, who also would know exactly what's coming. He was absolutely right in speaking of:

"The beginning of the discussion is to get everybody to acknowledge we've got a very, very serious problem,' said Thompson. "We haven't gotten to that stage yet.' He said Republican candidates are largely ignoring the issue. "Other than giving lip service to it ... I don't know that anybody is on the campaign trail," said Thompson. He ducked, however, when pressed on specifics.

Of course he can't give specifics, as the American people would riot if they knew the truth about Fred's facilitation of the SPPNA, which he must follow, by definition, as a CFR. Lord Nazh for example, appears blissfully unaware of what's going down, Matt is aware of the SPPNA but seemingly not yet of the financial collapse which appears to be on the way and I'm trying to warn as many as I can.

If you won't believe a little blogger, will you at least listen to the Republican Presidential candidate on this?

4 comments:

  1. I'm a bit lost here. Can you clarify the connection between Thompson and the impending financial chaos?

    ReplyDelete
  2. You're frightening me but there isn't anything I can do about any of it.

    ReplyDelete
  3. WCL - Not trying to frighten - just make people aware, as FT himself is doing.

    LM - FT is CFR. CFR is behind the SPPNA and the people in it are also behind the Fed. Both are committed to anti-U.S. measures of destabilization.

    The question is not so much that they are but if they'll succeed. That is the main point of dispute.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Funny you should mention the impending financial collapse, James. I saw an article a few days ago on Yahoo! News (don't have the link, sorry!) about despite Wall Street's jitters, dollar marches on or something to that effect. Pastor has said another big catastrophe (along the lines of 9/11) is needed to push the NAU all the way. When that collapes happens (will be soon, as Ecuador (they use US dollar as official currency) and the rest of South America (according to a friend of mine) will soon be moving towards a unified currency based on the euro's power), we will see what my countrymen are made of. I don't think we will disappoint in the least ;-)

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.