Devout Christian Scientist Tom Cruise and Katie Holmes "have reportedly decided to pose nude for a magazine", in accordance with their beliefs.
As Michelle Johnson of the Melbourne Age pleads:
Tom, please, we've already been scarred by your couch-jumping antics and public displays of affection - enough is enough!
Or as one of the commenters pleaded:
Why can't couples just do it like john and yoko - straight up nude no effects with lighting or props or computers just "have a look at me todger and check out me missus tits".
Bogie and Bacall were my parents' generation so it's hardly likely that they would be touted by me as a romantic couple and yet who else since the 50s would be worthy to tie their boot laces? Posh and Becks?
Of course you recognize this famous couple, don't you?
Bogie and Bacall a romantic couple? I don't think so. More like a someone looking for a father figure to adore and be adored by.
ReplyDeleteYes, JMB - but what a father figure, eh? Wouldn't you like to cuddle up to him?
ReplyDeleteWhere'd this post go? I didn't see it before. My Dad used to call HB "Umpty Gocart" and I would love to cuddle up to him! A lot of women want a father figure. I always thought it was interesting that later Bacall married Robards, who looked just like HB - hardly fair on Robards, was it? Pierre and Marie Curie?
ReplyDeleteCuddle with Bogie, no thank you. He had the gravelly voice of a smoker, which did him in, a face like the back of a bus and he couldn't act his way out of a paper bag.
ReplyDeleteNow maybe Sean Connery, with his lovely light Scots accent.
So we've established that Bogie is out and Sean is in but you'd best hurry, JMB - not many miles left in the tank with him now.
ReplyDeletePersonally I don't think LB was that great either.
Newman and Woodward.
ReplyDeleteThose Curies look constipated.
ReplyDeletePerhaps, Julie.
ReplyDelete