I’ve been asked what I mean by the ‘Big One’ in 2012. Firstly sorry - some of the links in the last post 'jumped' but have now been restored. Secondly, one or two more things on 7/7:
# Benjamin Netanyahu was on the way to a conference at the same hotel where Rudy Giuliani was also staying, when he received the warning. This doesn’t lead anywhere, it’s just interesting.
# The server in Houston [on which the Islamic organization claimed responsibility] has intriguing connections. Everyone's Internet was founded by brothers Robert and Roy Marsh in 1998 and by 2002 had an income of more than $30m (now about GBP17m).Renowned for his charitable work, Roy Marsh counts among his friends President George Bush's former sister-in-law, Sharon Bush, and the president's navy secretary.
# Many "Islamist extremist" websites are hosted in the United States - here's an interesting compilation.
If I had to put my money down to save my life, I’d go with this idea: Blair was in Singapore securing the Olympics, then flew to Scotland for the G8. He would have had his mind somewhat pre-occupied and any terrorism question would have been left to the professionals.
If it is admitted that Israel gave a warning six minutes before [which is very hard to deny on the evidence] or if it was given two days before [which has less supporting it], then for Blair not to have been instantly informed would have been impossible. The defence that he wasn’t informed because of the chance of disrupting the summit doesn’t wash. His underlings had to inform the PM of such a thing and at this time of heightened tension, the communication lines would have been instant.
As to whether Tony Blair ever lies, see the earlier post on the Bilderbergers. If we can assume, for the moment, that he knew, were there strategic reasons for him not to act? In other words, like in World War II, was it in the interests of the greater number of the populace not to act? Or did it suit his book not to act? Soon after, he pushed very hard for the ID legislation and all sorts of measures followed on. Again, assuming he knew, then by definition, the EU chiefs might have known too because their legislation followed hard on the heels as well.
Given the undeniable push for restructuring Europe and implementing draconian measures, for what purpose could that be? Because they’re expecting some sort of atrocity which they’ll either thwart or not? Matters little – it’s the Hegelian principle anyway. When? 2012? Too late. It has to come earlier so that the process of legislation can be given a chance to get through the Lords. It will take one parliamentary term to achieve that - to pull the last teeth from the Lords.
So what then is 2012? The new, ultra-secure, regulated Olympics possibly. The final joining with Europe in all respects, including the database on citizens of the union, Britain having already sundered as an entity. Whatever, they’re certainly in a hurry to get it all implemented.
# Benjamin Netanyahu was on the way to a conference at the same hotel where Rudy Giuliani was also staying, when he received the warning. This doesn’t lead anywhere, it’s just interesting.
# The server in Houston [on which the Islamic organization claimed responsibility] has intriguing connections. Everyone's Internet was founded by brothers Robert and Roy Marsh in 1998 and by 2002 had an income of more than $30m (now about GBP17m).Renowned for his charitable work, Roy Marsh counts among his friends President George Bush's former sister-in-law, Sharon Bush, and the president's navy secretary.
# Many "Islamist extremist" websites are hosted in the United States - here's an interesting compilation.
If I had to put my money down to save my life, I’d go with this idea: Blair was in Singapore securing the Olympics, then flew to Scotland for the G8. He would have had his mind somewhat pre-occupied and any terrorism question would have been left to the professionals.
If it is admitted that Israel gave a warning six minutes before [which is very hard to deny on the evidence] or if it was given two days before [which has less supporting it], then for Blair not to have been instantly informed would have been impossible. The defence that he wasn’t informed because of the chance of disrupting the summit doesn’t wash. His underlings had to inform the PM of such a thing and at this time of heightened tension, the communication lines would have been instant.
As to whether Tony Blair ever lies, see the earlier post on the Bilderbergers. If we can assume, for the moment, that he knew, were there strategic reasons for him not to act? In other words, like in World War II, was it in the interests of the greater number of the populace not to act? Or did it suit his book not to act? Soon after, he pushed very hard for the ID legislation and all sorts of measures followed on. Again, assuming he knew, then by definition, the EU chiefs might have known too because their legislation followed hard on the heels as well.
Given the undeniable push for restructuring Europe and implementing draconian measures, for what purpose could that be? Because they’re expecting some sort of atrocity which they’ll either thwart or not? Matters little – it’s the Hegelian principle anyway. When? 2012? Too late. It has to come earlier so that the process of legislation can be given a chance to get through the Lords. It will take one parliamentary term to achieve that - to pull the last teeth from the Lords.
So what then is 2012? The new, ultra-secure, regulated Olympics possibly. The final joining with Europe in all respects, including the database on citizens of the union, Britain having already sundered as an entity. Whatever, they’re certainly in a hurry to get it all implemented.
I'm sure Graham Hancock wrote a whole book on the idea that 2012 was the end of the world....
ReplyDeleteNow isn't that interesting? I confess I haven't checked anyone over it. It just seems the time it's going to take for the EU to get everything into place for its major move. Notsaussure is probably more correct when he mentions the GE combined with the EUE. What I find dispiriting is that there is evidence that our leaders are selling out our country.
ReplyDeleteI read that 2012 was when the magentic poles were meant to switch again too with lots of horrible consequences for us all.
ReplyDelete