nourishing obscurity

Arrange these

Put the sections of the EM spectrum in order from highest to lowest energy, either left to right or in number order, one being highest:

infrared radiation
radio waves
X-rays
gamma rays
visible light
ultraviolet radiation

What’s on all of our minds right now

Monday [7 to 11]

11. Complicity theorist

10. Distant Relative

https://www.timesofisrael.com/real-world-israeli-data-shows-south-african-variant-better-at-bypassing-vaccine/

A commenter on Gab using the moniker ShortbutSweet wrote:

Monday [5 & 6]

6. The Slog and other excellent pundits

Please do not get me wrong here - in depth analysis from a non-Woke standpoint is like hens' teeth today, so no issue there. I would certainly hope you're checking out diverse sources - the whole point of blogging is that you're still free to do the rounds.

The issue is this - how can I put this without offending? Every one of us comes to this post now from different backgrounds, different education, different reading lists. Those whose reading has been primarily within their own sphere will be coloured by that sphere.

My stepfather had been in the war, in different theatres, he'd known privations, his reality came from that and from the MSM. Along comes the young, higher-educated, flowery-spoken type of stepson and that yoof is steeped in alternative sources. You can imagine the reaction - guttural laugh, followed by: "Right, fine, anything you say, now can we get onto something else?"

So many pundits like John Ward or the Z Man and others are great thinkers, they certainly come up with ingenious insights - problem is that the insights are missing key input which skew the whole thing. If you create scenarios based on not accepting core elements, e.g. about the Papacy, about organised religion, about satanic abuse - if you refuse to even look at it because 1. it's distasteful and 2. you'd be laughed at scornfully, then I suggest you're not doing your job.