Saturday, October 11, 2008

[labour deaths] the stress of the job perhaps

The list had reached Fiona Jones, Piara Khabra [old age], John MacDougall, Ron Brown [age], Gwynneth Dunwoody, Rachel Squire, Terry Fields, Roger Stott, Bernie Grant and Tony Banks before I realized I'd have to leave off those who "legitimately" died of old age and its complications.

Not quite dead but assaulted include Anne Moffat so far but it seems that Harriet Harman [see last post] is a candidate for this too.

The premise I was exploring was whether there seem to have been an inordinate number of Labour MPs in seats coming up for bielection in the past few years and if so, why?

Is it hazardous to be a Labour MP?

[harriet harman] let's bully the private sector again


Please - I do urge you to go over to Flipchart Fairytales and look at the latest government coercion on the drawing board. To shamelessly lift a section of Rick's article:

The Government Equalities Office has launched its Post Your Pay Gap initiative. The idea is that companies use the online system to calculate the gap in pay between men and women then post it on the web-site. It’s a bit like a corporate confessional - “We know we’re doing wrong but we will try better.”

But just in case there isn’t a mad rush from private sector organisations to post their pay gaps, the equalities secretary, Harriet Harman, has said that she might consider compelling them to do so.

This is the Harriet Harman who is supposed to be the most able, intelligent operator the government has. Here is her level of intelligence and sense of fair play:

Equality minister Harriet Harman has set out plans to allow firms to discriminate in favour of female and ethnic minority job candidates. She said firms should be able to choose a woman over a man of equal ability if they wanted to - or vice versa.


I have gone for a number of jobs recently and every time they have been forced to ask me to give details of my:

1 gender
2 age
3 ethnicity

No other details, such as experience or ability were required at this point of the interviews. If Ms Harman is equal and fair, then why should she be interested in these? Does she plan to discriminate towards me? Does she heck as like:

Allowing "positive action" would help organisations such as the police better reflect the communities they serve by recruiting more female and ethnic minority officers, said Ms Harman.

Positive discrimination? Positive? How is it positive to the ordinary members of the public? In the private sector they employ people they feel they need for the reasons they feel they need. I'm happy enough to stand on my own two feet this way but not with Numbers 1 and 3 officially working against me, even if Number 2 is working for me.

Let's look at Number 2.

The moment you send your CV, the employer sees your decades of experience and concludes your age. It needs no legislation. They can then make up any excuse they like as to why your application did not proceed. In the end they need only conclude they prefer the other person. End of story.

You can't legislate to make people do things which are their own legitimate concern to administer as they see fit. Age is a sad thing but it is inevitable and we just have to lump it. If we are still up to speed and look like we could be for some time yet then we must work hard to sell our skills, always remembering that there is a lot of competition out there.

[nobel prize] and the grumblings of discontent

The Americans seem a trifle miffed about the winner of the Nobel prize for Literature, Jean-Marie Gustave Le Clezio:

Last week, Engdahl, the Swedish Academy's permanent secretary, called American literary culture "too isolated, too insular. They don't translate enough and don't really participate in the big dialogue of literature" -- comments widely seen in the United States as evidence of the insularity of the Nobel itself and proof that American writers would be shut out again.

This is a storm in a teacup in one way but it is also a harbinger of troubles ahead where everyone and his dog seem a little testy at this time. The expression "trigger finger" springs to mind and a lot of shooting from the hip may well ensue, causing Europeans to call for action on the U.S. and vice versa.

Why do the U.S. and Europe need to be reminded that they are both socio-religiously from the same stock, the same economic structure and the same grey suited leadership? Conflict is stupidity between these blocs when there are other far more real enemies to contend with.

Friday, October 10, 2008

[crashes] and the marketing of faulty parts

One wouldn't think this could be so with Star Alliance


Regarding that Spanair flight 5022, which crashed on takeoff in August:

It is unclear why the wing flaps failed to deploy, but the error was compounded by the failure of the cockpit alert system, which should have sounded a warning to the pilots.

I hope it is not mischievous or misleading to suggest this as a possible cause:

From 2002
Yesterday it emerged that the US Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) has issued a warning to 167 countries over the potential danger caused by the scam ... The Rome daily Il Messaggero yesterday published a list of five air accidents that it said investigators suspected could have been caused by faulty spare parts. They included the crash of an ATI ATR 42 near Milan in October 1987, a Dornier 328 operated by Minerva Airlines which overshot the runway in Genoa in February 1999, and the crash of a Valujet DC 9 in southern Florida in May 1996.

The parts were found in Sicilia:

"[They] were in an appalling state," said Aniello Albano, of the Sardinian finance police. "The workshops carried out cosmetic operations on them in order to defraud the airlines."

Some other parts, the result of the cannibalisation of six Alitalia Airbus A300s by the Panaviation company, were about to be sent to the US where they were to be offered for sale by Danbee Aerospace, an aircraft parts broker based in Greensboro, North Carolina.


Nobody seems to suggest that this is a problem with the larger airlines but if you go budget, well ... everything is proportionally budget, isn't it? Star Alliance have a good record though and so it seems unlikely that it was a shoddy parts scam.

Interestingly, one common factor in many crashes seems to be the McDonnell Douglas MD-82. Just something to bear in mind, I suppose.

[the condemned] when genius is not

We watched an allegorical film last night, "The Condemned", in which a charismatic but evil genius manipulates those about him to help satisfy his perversions, in this case, putting some people on an island and watching them rape and murder each other until one is left standing, all lovingly captured for internet streaming.

He's suave and debonair, the so-called genius, with a pleasing exterior which conceals the sick individual beneath and it's enough to satisfy his "friends" and cohorts that he is a man with a mission, a man of ideas and the gift of the gab ... plus he has a lot of money.

However, one by one, those cohorts, starting with his girlfriend [in a manner of speaking] are sickened, not only by his antics but by the relish with which he watches the gore - this relish is what brings him down in the end.

It is a tale of how ordinary people can be hoodwinked and even bribed into assisting evil and that evil comes out in other ways too, for example, the two who get the most brutal treatment are the husband and wife who are first separated and then endure much, not unlike martyrs.

How dare they even think of the power of love at a time like that.

In the end, love does win out when the most flawed fulfils his ambition to get back to his love interest, killing off all the baddies along the way. For me, it pointed out quite starkly that those people considered genius, when they turn to evil, are already on the way out and are no geniuses at all - just clever and well spoken fools.

There is also the question of where they are going to end up, these people. The "hero" himself is so flawed that it is line ball where he'll be but what's fairly certain is the warm welcome the sicko is going to receive in the nether regions when he pops his clogs. He had his chances - he could have stopped the spectacle on a number of occasions but like a true fool, he either didn't or couldn't.

When you mistreat people, it all comes back on you one day.

Thursday, October 09, 2008

[just when you thought it was safe] be afraid ... be very afraid

Report

Aaaagh! The mouth is back! Is anyone safe in his or her bed? That scourge of the blogwaves, Ubermouth, is up and running again and kicking butt.

Anyone have anything to hide out there? She's gonna find it.

So to today's report - well it wasn't the greatest idea trying to find a customer's billing information and credit rating and I was a bit slow, truth be told. You try typing in 345938471922304 while dealing with two other calls but I got up to speed near the end and might make not a bad receptionist - pity the bod's not up to scratch, in keeping with the role.

Now it's raining here but it's quite soothing really. The weather had better clear up for the trip to Southhampton on the weekend - think I'll give this interview away tomorrow too in Droitwich Spa.

Friends

Just received an email and it simply reiterates something said by my mate earlier. Now I'm going out on a limb and printing a fragment of it against my own rules but it's too good not to quote:

What's important are friends who are tried in the fire. They are the gold in the dross.

Aren't they ever and slowly, one day at a time, I'm discovering who they are. They might disagree on some things but there is something indefinable in their manner in a letter which says everything. This is such a rewarding time just now and it's going to get better.

[afghanistan] why did no one read history


UPDATE: You might like to look at this excellent post on the issue as well.

A little plug for the Asia Times. In understanding things going on in the Arab/Asian world, this is always a good first step. Admittedly, many of the correspondents are not pro-US but if you weigh what they say against the US line, then the truth lies somewhere inbetween.

On the inevitable failure of the Afghan war, these have been some reasons given:

One, the seven-year war is in a stalemate and time favors the Taliban.

Two, the US is increasingly focused on the bailout of its economy, which leaves little scope both in terms of time and resources for Washington to indulge in the extravaganza of undertaking on its own open-ended wars in faraway badlands.

Three, the US is having a hard time persuading its allies to provide troops for the war effort and even faithful allies like Britain seem fatigued and appear uneasy about the US's war strategy.

Four, whatever little popular support the puppet regime in Kabul headed by Karzai enjoyed so far is fast declining, which makes the current setup unsustainable.


Five, the Taliban have gained habitation and name on the Afghan landscape and no amount of allegations regarding Pakistan's dubious role can hide the reality that the Taliban's support base is rapidly widening.


Six, the regional climate - growing instability in Pakistan, tensions in US-Russia relations, NATO's role, Iran's new assertiveness, including possible future support of the Afghan resistance - is steadily worsening and the need arises for the US to recalibrate the prevailing geopolitical alignments and shore up its political and strategic assets created during the 2001-2008 period from being eroded.

Add to this another article from 2006 and the picture is clearer:

General Boris Gromov, the charismatic Soviet commander who supervised the withdrawal in 1989, warned, "The Afghan resistance is, in my opinion, growing. Such behavior on the part of the intractable Afghans is to my mind understandable. It is conditioned by centuries of tradition, geography, climate and religion.

We saw over a period of many years how the country was torn apart by civil war ... But in the face of outside aggressions, Afghans have always put aside their differences and united. Evidently, the [US-led] coalition forces are also being seen as a threat to the nation."

The inability to earn respect and command authority plus the heavy visible dependence on day-to-day US support have rendered the Kabul setup ineffective. Alongside this, the Afghan malaise of nepotism, tribal affiliations and corruption has also led to bad governance. It is in this combination of circumstances that the Taliban have succeeded in staging a comeback.

Washington had its chance in 2001 of setting up alliances in such a way that the Taliban need never have captured people's hearts but they opted instead for a NATO intervention which did not understand local factors and thought it could bulldoze its way through.

That the Taliban's guerilla warfare is succeeding once again is surely testimony to how the locals view foreigners on their soil and Karzai in Kabul. It's a case of " first get rid of the foreigners in a war of attrition and then we can restart the traditional bloodletting amongst ourselves."

[Earlier article on the Taliban and NATO.]

There is a feeling in some quarters that Afghanistan II was both an answer to the American people following 911 and a training run for what is coming up 2012-18. The strategy should have been thought out far better, in order to maximize its chances. Hell, they actually had the Taliban down and then lost the window of opportunity in a series of gung ho moves, to which the opposition by anyone back home was fiercely attacked as unpatriotic.

How unpatriotic is it to wish for a clever strategy in order to attain one's objectives? This one has not been clever at all.


[women] this blog's opinon of them


Woman and man as one
Together hear us roar
In numbers too big to ignore
And we know too much to go back an' pretend
'cause we've heard it all before
And we've both been down there on the floor
No one's ever gonna keep us down again
With their divide and rule and all
Divided we will fall
But if we merge one with the other
Then you'll see us soar

[humanizing Helen Reddy, returning her to some sanity]



The often unspoken artificial conflict between men and women would have to be the most boring time waster ever devised. Why does the youth/age, gay/normal, black/white, anglo/non-anglo or blonde/brown-haired divide not dominate political discussion instead?

Why must battle lines be drawn along gender lines? Who hijacked the political agenda and created serious rifts where there needed be no serious rifts? Who stuffed kids’ heads full of this rubbish over two generations and have now achieved their result of mutual mistrust and intolerance?

A woman can multitask, she has an approach of onwards and upwards for the most part, each step needing to be an improvement on the last, she has a certain perspective in business but so does a man. Men can, for the most part, find lateral solutions, they bring a sort of blunt realism at the same time that they bring out the softness in a woman.

There is no doubt they can bring out the best in each other, once they are secure in themselves, in their own sexuality, in their roles in the relationship, in the desire to build up, rather than break down, the other partner. Only a good man can get a woman purring like a kitten; a good woman can really ensure a man’s happiness better than anyone.

There are those sad people who would constantly emphasize and carp about the gender divide and how woman is a thousand times better than a man. Bollocks. There is a range of aptitude with both sexes – poor quality men and poor quality women plus the opposite.

I say blur the differences, look for the common ground, embrace the power of man and woman as one team of two. Today was a case in point. There were a dozen of us in a room, mainly men but some women. I got talking to some of the men, we found common ground and it was good. Before that, I’d been walking along the road, a car had stopped and the chap asked if I knew where the centre was. He offered me a lift.

Pleasant. Rewarding.

After it was all over, a lady and I started conversing and swiftly it went to stage two. Smiles abounded on both sides, we covered many topics and there was also that X factor that I’ve never been able to pin down. There is most certainly a male-female chemistry and those who would play that down puzzle me. It’s equal, it is compl-e-mentary, coml-i-mentary at the same time and it’s biological. It is good vibes.

Contrast that with a different conversation between two people. They chat and within the first few sentences he gets an earful of how much better women are than men, how women are oppressed and so on. What chance is there, given this level of bitterness, that any sort of meaningful relationship could build up? Seriously – what chance?

So that’s my opinion of women – I feel at ease around them whilst they see themselves as human rather than as female warriors, which allows me to be human rather than scathingly anti-feminist and there’s always a je ne sais quoi in relations with the majority I’ve known, even before we start to get into the … ahem … other aspects of the equation.

[long distance voyager] on through the starry night


Age humbles and makes you contract your world. Where once you travelled to your network and counted yourself lucky that it spanned the globe, where once you were free and vibrant, now you’re content to run on rails, still vibrant but for shorter periods of time and you do need the toilet at hand just that little bit more.

Some people are strange and that strangeness comes from their interlinked banal experiences. You can go into Canada, America or Russia and have a banal life, going to work each day, coming home, then someone phones you and offers you more banal part time work and so it goes, layer by layer.

Friends in Britain and Australia think you have an exciting, alluring life and it is certainly varied but ultimately, it is routine, each part of it in its own way. You are a very routine person, even a little dull, once the standard dinner conversation has reached a pregnant pause and your circumspect nature threatens to silence you.

Your CV looks good until you look behind it and see that you have not surrounded yourself with the trappings of one career area – you don’t have the CELTA or CLAIT or whatever you need, you can’t speak the jargon of one career or social group. Your accent is a blend and it contains elements which annoy the person you’re with, no matter where you are.

You’re the eternal alien – everyone is a different age, both older and younger. People like you and wish you well but you’re not one of them in the end. So you settle somewhere and put roots down but ultimately it is artificial. People you know all have immediate families [your own is either deceased or dispersed] and though they accept you, [the young implicitly and quickly and the more mature with a certain friendly reservation], it always has a shelf life, as they themselves change their circumstances.

There’s no niche, there are no roots. There are all these question marks, far more mysterious and exotic in appearance than in reality. In reality, you’ve just gone from one thing to another – in your younger days a healthy thing but now a little eyebrow raising. You’ve filled out physically and you’re cast in the role of the interesting itinerant returned. Where is your wife, your family? In which box do you naturally fit?

Though possessing a keen sense of manners and even etiquette, you lack the local jargon, the local manner and some of the things you come out with, some of the expressions, for example, are from another place, maybe from Russia and Australia. People politely say nothing but inside them, they’ve concluded that you’re a bit less than respectable. You’re not ordinary in their eyes but in yours, you are. You yearn to be.

You’re turned in on yourself, no matter how expansive your real nature because you’ve been reliant on yourself so long. It’s difficult for anyone to really penetrate your persona, you’re too closed, which precludes a regular partner who wants to know every last detail and then some. You don’t want to be like this and something inside you screams, “Ask me, just ask me and I’l tell you all,” but they shy away and are too reticent to do that. Do they fear something there, some dark secret which will alter their opinion? There is nothing in there – you are just an ordinary citizen translocated.

You don’t talk much about yourself, what’s the point? This makes people all the more suspicious and by lacking some of the social lubricant which demands you fill in that space with small talk, you say nothing instead. People with egos don’t like you, deep down because you tend to speak in “I” and “me” even though you try not to. Again, you’ve been in your own world for so long that there is no choice but to speak that way.

“When I was in Thailand,” you say or even, if you were lucky at that time, “When we were in Thailand.” but no one is really interested, except to relate when they “did” Thailand, which is actually interesting to you, just as everything out there is interesting to you but in the end, you return to silence.

People eventually feel let down because the promise which was in your eyes and the pleasure you feel in their company has not produced the results they had in mind when you arrived. You say to yourself that you have little promise in you and you’ve never claimed differently but the weight of expectation from others bears down on you and they feel cheated by you and want you to just move on.

The bureaucrats and officials have a field day with you, blocking you here, stymying you there, demanding some document you don’t have in an evermore constricted state where you need to have a statistical history in one country alone to be a person – so much for the jetset. People are jealous of your travels and “exotic lifestyle” and resent your moaning about how difficult it is.

The worst of it is that the mates you’d dearly like to accept you don’t do that because theirs is a closed shop – army buddies or engineers or businessmen and though you can converse with them and share many of the same values as them, though you are almost one of them, still you fall short.

Where does it end? Hopefully by taking another woman who likes to be with you and you try to make a life, even at this late stage. It’s never too late, you anxiously hope, as your receding hair and shortness of breath tell a different tale. Anyway, you’ve probably atrophied down there by now so it would be embarrassing that your technique has got so rusty from infrequent use. What was once par for the course you now shy away from and pretend you’re not interested any more.

It becomes apparent that you need a goal. You have thoughts of joining a company and immersing yourself in their corporate structure but they take one look at you and are amazed you even thought of such a thing at this age. Someone gives you a chance and you take it.

You start a blog and think that a cool purpose in life would be to spread goodwill. Douglas Adams’ spaceman travelled from planet to planet, insulting people in alphabetical order and that’s a good purpose but spreading goodwill is ultimately more fun. You go to a shop and make an observation to the shopgirl – she likes it but the mate you’re with says, “Creep,” only half jokingly. Hell, it was true what you said. Oh well.

Your blog becomes a bit more and takes on a life of its own and the folly of humanity proves too much not to comment on, to the point people see you as so cynical. You have a penchant for losing friends but in the end, the real ones remain.

Tomorrow is another busy day, so you finish the extended rant you were writing at 01:22 because you couldn’t sleep but you need to sleep because you have another job interview.

Wednesday, October 08, 2008

[zevon] last interview with letterman

This one is best done from a pov angle. When I was in Youtube looking for another artist, the two names Letterman and Zevon popped up in the sidebar and I thought why not?

Expecting it to open with a song of Warren Zevon's and then the interview, he didn't seem to be around but the band leader and Letterman were eulogizing. Then I noticed that the whole show was about Zevon and a sinking feeling came over that this was an obituary.

Close. He died a few months later of lung cancer and this was his last appearance. Then the next surprise came when he actually shuffled across the floor and joined Letterman for the interview, a physical shell of what he'd once been and yet still sharp of mind in answer to the questions.

I was about to click out, as these things are not too nice but couldn't click out - his answers were loaded with humour and Letterman himself asked Zevon how he could joke in this situation. Letterman didn't feel he would and Zevon immediately answered, "Oh yes, I know you would." [6:25]

The first half of this long video is eulogy so you might like to let it load and come back to click halfway through - I think this interview is well worth the time and trouble.

It certainly affected me.



Zevon when relatively healthy and a lot younger:



Probably only for the afficianados:

Part 2
Part 3
Part 4