Sunday, October 28, 2007

[chip dumped] military romanian takes over

There's been a coup de dale over at the Chipster's. It seems his piece of fluff ... sorry ... his 64 year old military, tank loving girlfriend, hs taken over his blog - could this be the start of a revolution or will they kiss and make up?

Personally, I feel we need some more photos, just to make sure like that she is all woman.

[rugby] does the code need an overhaul

There could be some sour grapes in Oz over Wilkinson and yet Greg Baum’s proposals seem to make sense to me.

Firstly, in my playing days, I always appreciated the breakdown of play the kick to touch gave because it gave a brief respite – a reason I hated sevens; so what to make of Baum's nostalgia for the French of old:
They played a game I could understand. They ran at breakneck speed, flicking the ball between them in such lightning movements that it was sometimes impossible to know where it was.

What to do about rugby? The foremost is obvious: more points for a try, less for a penalty kick. The emphasis would change: the premium would be on going boldly to the try line, rather than butt and bullock away to force obscure infractions. But I would keep the incentive for a field goal: it adds spice.

Increasing the reward for a try could have negative impact. In professional sport, the greater the prize, the harder teams work to deny it to their opponents. Some [changes] — called the Stellenbosch Laws — were trialled in the recent Australian championship.

The advantage rule was broadened. Teams were given encouragements to play on constantly, so minimising the incidence of pile-ups and scrums. Authorities strived for a faster, more open, more constant game.
Personally, I’d like to see the following points awarded:

Linked try [player alone]: 6
Forced try [more than one in push]: 5
Field goal: 4
Conversion: 3
Penalty outside opponent’s 25 [shows my age]: 2
Penalty inside the 25: 1

Don’t forget New Zealand, 2011.

[micro-control 2] how to recognize it when you see it

This follows the first article in the series here.

I’d like to make it clear that this second article is not intended as “evidence” of any kind and doesn’t touch on that supplied by Anonymous. That comes from the third article onwards.

One needs to be patient.

This here deals, in large part, with one woman’s testimony and stands or falls by that. It excludes all she said which I can’t corroborate from other sources or else is too early to bring in at this point.

It deals, essentially, with the type we’re up against

There is a mentality, a way of operating, of treating others, which characterizes those who are hauling us to a destiny we would not choose for ourselves.

If I use the reference labels “them” and “they”, it’s because theirs is a nebulous way of thinking, shared by many people of a certain societal level, rather than specific individuals – the individual is subordinate in this thing.

Nevertheless, there are certain key characteristics which are always present and permeate everything which they do.

One of my sources for an overview of the mindset is a woman who supposedly escaped the clutches of these people and it’s hardly relevant who she actually is, whether she’s someone’s stooge, an imaginative author or what – she certainly chimes in with what we can see in subsequent articles.

My co-author Anonymous might not be happy that I begin with this, when he is solely concerned with “irrefutable evidence”. I am too but this overview is useful as well to know what to look out for. Plus two more things.

I’ve searched for definitive debunkings of this woman’s words and have yet to find any.

Also, bear in mind that she wrote these things in the mid to late 90s, before what we see today had begun to fully appear to the public eye. The time frame is quite vital because it can be, in no way, 20/20 vision.

Many researchers knew her as Svali. When asked who she was in RL, as distinct from as one of their trainers, she replied:

I am a professional writer in the medical field, was a registered nurse for 18+ years, and currently work as an ESL teacher, health educator, and freelance author.

Interviewed by HJ Springer, Chief Editor CentrExNews.com. 2000, here are some of the things which came from that interview:

Who are they?

The leadership levels include businessmen, bankers, and local community leaders. They are intelligent, well educated, and active in their local churches.


Above local leadership councils are the regional councils, who dictate to the groups below them, help form the policies and agendas for each region, and who interact with the local leadership councils.

At the national level, there are extremely wealthy people who finance these goals and interact with the leaders of other countries.

They have divided the United States up into 7 major regions, and each has a regional council over it, with the heads of the local councils reporting to them. They meet once every two months, and on special occasions.

[They] believe in controlling an area through its:
1. Banks and financial institutions (guess how many sit on banking boards?)
2. Local government: guess how many get elected to local city councils?
3. Law: children are encouraged to go to law school and medical school.
4. Media: others are encouraged to go to journalism school, and members help fund local papers.
People know their status in the group by how far ahead of time they know a meeting date. The lower in the group, the less they are trusted with information, and the less "lag time" before meetings.

These are NOT nice people and they use and manipulate others viciously. They cut their eye teeth on status, power, and money.

An example: my mother was friends with Sid Gottlieb, who was part of the CIA. The farm I grew up on was only about a half hour away from his home in Culpeper, Va. She also knew the Dulles family. A lot of the researchers in the CIA were part of it, and I visited Langley, Va. at intervals growing up.

They are very duplicitous people.

They believe that basically, they are GOOD and doing a good work, even if the means are tough to endure at the time. They are weeding out the weak and unfit, and developing a supreme human being. I know it sounds like hog wash, but they truly, honestly believe this at a core level.

[They] believe that their children are the brightest and best and will be the intellectual elite who will rule over the unintelligent, or "less fit".

They are full of pride, believe they are invulnerable … and that any press about them is the equivalent of a gnat to be swatted. Arrogant people make mistakes, and they are becoming more blatant and open in recent years.

There is a lot of discontent in the ranks, and there would be a mass exodus if the members believed it were really possible to get out (and live).

On world affairs, again remembering that she was taught this in the 80s and wrote of it in the 90s

Russia was never really a threat to us. Marxism was funded by [them], and espoused as a counterbalance to capitalism. [They] believe strongly in balancing opposing forces, in the pull between opposites. They see history as a complex chess game, and they will fund one side, then another, while ultimately out of the chaos and division, they are laughing because they are ultimately beyond political parties.

China will be ranked after the USSR, then the U.S. But a lot of the current U.S. leadership will be in Europe when the change occurs, and many have homes there. They will be "changing nationalities" overnight, as it were. This is the little that I do remember.

I believe it is impossible to win a presidential election in our country today without their backing. The Kennedy family were punished because they tried to disobey them. They were free thinkers, and too hard to "control".

Want to hear the end of the world scenario [as I was taught]?

There will be continued conflict in the Middle East … an economic collapse that will devastate the economy of the US and Europe, much like the great depression.

One reason that our economy continues limping along is the artificial support that the Federal Reserve had given it, manipulating interest rates, etc. But one day, this won't work (or this leverage will be withdrawn on purpose) and the next great depression will hit.

The government will call in its bonds and loans, and credit card debts will be called in. There will be massive bankruptcies nationwide. Europe will stabilize first and then Germany, France and England will have the strongest economies, and will institute, through the UN, an international currency.

Japan will also pull out, although their economy will be weakened.

Peacekeeping forces will be sent out by the UN and local bases to prevent riots. The … people will be asked to make a pledge of loyalty during a time of chaos and financial devastation.

The good news is that if a person is debt-free, owes nothing to the government or credit debt, and can live self sufficiently, they may do better than others. I would invest in gold, not stocks, if I had the income. Gold will once again be the world standard, and dollars will be pretty useless.

On the metaphysical side, they believe

…that their roots go back to the ancient mystery religions of Babylon, Egypt, and Celtic druidism. They have taken what they consider the "best" of each, the foundational practices, and joined them together into a strongly occult discipline…

Hence temples, grand lodges and the like. Hence the giant stone owl at the world leaders’ summer camp in California [see pic here, for example].

There are 12 steps to this [way of operating], also known as "the 12 steps of discipline'.

I don't care if this steps on any toes, it's a fact. The Masonic temple at Alexandria, Virginia (the city itself was named after Alexandria, Egypt, and is a hotbed of … activity) is a center in the Washington, DC area for [their] scholarship and teaching. I was taken there at intervals for testing, to step up a level, for scholarship, and high ceremonies.

[They] also believe their bloodlines have come down from the ancient kings of Egypt.

On symbols

The phoenix is one of their highest, the eagle, red on black, or the reverse, butterflies and rainbow signs, gem stones, the Star of David, believe it or not, earth, water, and fire, a tremendous amount of Greek and Roman mythology, lightning bolts, a head with a computer inside, pyramids …

On why people either don’t know about this or reject it out of hand:

The evidence is there, but in my opinion, the average person does NOT want to know, and even when confronted with it, will look the other way … the MK-Ultra documents that have been declassified, shown as real, and people still ignore it.

But I believe that the media that downplays [it] is feeding into a deep need in the average person to NOT know the reality. In fact, how can a person face the fact of great evil in mankind, unless they have either a strong faith in G-d, or are faced with insurmountable evidence? We as human beings want to believe the BEST of our race, not the worst.

How to stop them:

1. Their arrogance (I think I mentioned this before) is their weakness. These people think they are untouchable, and this could make them careless.

2. If by a miracle, enough people took this SERIOUSLY … and God's guidance, perhaps they could be stopped. I hope so, with all of my heart.

3. Stopping pornography and child prostitution and drug smuggling and gun running would take a huge chunk out of their profits.

4. To be honest, I don't know what could really stop them. I have written about this group to try and expose them, I have gone to the police … I guess each person has to do his best in fighting these people, in the way they feel led to. My skills tend to be in writing, so I am using them.

Anything else?

From my own sources and without attempting to prove any of it at this stage, I’d add:

1. They favour hierarchical structures – though they operate in teams at lower echelons, the hierarchy is still much in evidence in terms of promotional opportunities and “carrots”. To employ Svali’s own words, they:

…are a very political and back stabbing group, a "dog eat dog" mentality; everyone wants to move up…

A person’s natural desire to do well creates an “invitation” scenario. One is invited to write [in our case as authors] for certain publications, one attends the little get-togethers with those above us, the waters are tested as to what a person is prepared to do to move up.

A person who draws the line is applauded outwardly but is actually then marginalized and windows of opportunity now cease to open up as they’d begun to do.

There’s a very “clubby” atmosphere to it all - the “hush power” I’ve referred to before – and it is nice to be recognized, courted, to earn vastly more, to sit in the first class lounge rather than with the plebs. I suppose I felt it most in my times in Frankfurt.

2. They do like symbolism, e.g. the XX in ExxonMobil. Plus some other things:

Look out for muted blues, yellows and pinky reds on their webheaders and in their literature, diffuse colours in a sort of watercolour swirl, accompanied with high sounding bureaucrat-speak which actually comes down to nothing specific, such as “Preparing for Tomorrow Today” and so on.

Look out for colour coding, especially people who colour code their sections or folders [or even blogrolls].

Look out for images which are happy and loving up front, show men, women and sometimes infants in happy poses but then in the text are quite relativist and morally equivalent, devoid of specific aims.

There was a cogent example of this with one of our own Blogpowerers in a post last week – beautiful rhetoric, punctuated with photo-images to reinforce it but hollow in substance when analysed and in its values, equivalent and relative in the extreme.

Tied in with this is the absolutely naff banner or logo design which a schoolkid could have come up with here [now relegated to the bottom of the page after severe criticism]. Here is another example. Think for one moment about the mindset which both came up with and approved those logos - that's quite some mind to entrust your future to.

PCism [an example is here and another particularly egregious example is here] is also part of this – with vague ideas of tolerance and love for oppressed minorities but moving down channels proponents often don’t foresee and with ways of legislating what they want into existence, whilst firmly believing it’s all for the benefit of society.

Look out for poor navigation on sites and in publications and things left unexplained, e.g. just what Common Purpose really means. When you follow the links in what initially seems good navigation, they always end up curtailed, speaking of “graduates” without actually specifying the nature of the training, the curriculum or from whence the teaching staff is derived.

There is never any explicit statement of purpose except, say, “beyond authority”. It’s biz-speak in its worst form and it’s not designed for such as me or maybe you – it’s designed for the young hopeful who wants to move up in the world and is happy to accept the slick presentation, elegant colours and platitudes without seriously questioning their source nor where they lead.

There is a certain type of punter who laps that type of thing up because it appeals to something deep inside.

Horses for courses – what appeals to young women in a woman’s magazine is stated differently with, say, Second Life. There it is the “power of cyber-possibility” which appeals, young avatars and slick graphics, the “wow” factor.

There is absolutely nothing new in this. Agatha Christie’s Inspector Grant said, in N or M [1941]:

It appeals to something in man, some desire or lust for power.

The next part of that quote is relevant to the next point.

3. Loyalty is a fluid concept with them, [what I call the “Sutherland mndset”, especially in respect to nationalism and patriotism. These are people without nations, loyal to a higher good. Christie’s quote continues:

These people were ready to betray their country, not for money but in some sort of megalomaniacal pride in what they, they themselves, were going to achieve for that country. In every land it has been the same.

4. They’re quite militaristic, favouring quasi-military solutions for perceived problems in the public sphere. It’s very much part of their persona to favour checkpoints, surveillance, armed paramilitary police instead of the friendly neighbourhood bobby and always that hierarchical model, as distinct from an occupation and task oriented structure.

5. Their propaganda is both soft and hard, the hard following the tried and tested pseudo-Hegelian derivative - here are some instructions:
a. over decades, by means of stacking positions of power in every field with like-minded people - undermine the ability of the organs of state to respond;
b. create a crisis when the time’s right;
c. identify the enemy who caused this outrage and his hangers on and apologists [lumping in one’s own opponents here];
d. allow the undermined and atrophied organs of state to fail to respond adequately;
e. await the public rumblings then outcry, the flames of which you yourself have fanned with occasional well-timed statements;
f. step up with a pre-groomed messiah, e.g. Tony Blair in ‘92, who speaks vague words of great sense and is possessed of a great sense of energy and enthusiasm;
g. mission complete.
Why?

Meaning why is it all going on? Why can’t people just enjoy the pleasure of a productive working week, repartee, the conviviality of the pub and a quiet smoke, the Sunday lunch and drive, holidays and so on? Where is the necessity for crisis?

Ask the ghost of Nietzsche. Ask Ian Hay, who in The First Hundred Thousand, in 1915, wrote:

War is hell, and all that, but it has a good deal to recommend it. It wipes out all the small nuisances of peace-time.

Such as not having your son’s body riddled with bullets as he lies face down in the mud, I suppose, Mr. Hay. Like not having to live on rations and in a state of constant fear. To which Hay might reply:

Well, at least it’s better than living in debt as a virtual pauper, as the government lurches from crisis to crisis.

But this is that old Inversion and Deception again, Mr. Hay, that old chestnut. There would be no recession and depression in the first place if people’s greed and ambition had not caused them to eat of the Deadly Nightshade and be poisoned by its hallucinogens.

The whole purpose of those societal ills in the first place was to set the scene for the real money-spinner – war.

And to sentient beings who think and feel and have a moral framework? They go the way of all things, like the entire intelligentsia in Stalin’s USSR.

Like the blogosphere.

In part 3, we get down to the nitty gritty of 2007 and beyond.



Notes
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7

Saturday, October 27, 2007

[saturday anagram quiz] leave them scrambled

1. sockttub
2. mymtu
3. pesbic
4. daqus
5. dershulos

buttocks, tumy, biceps, quads, shoulders

[blogfocus saturday] pink for girls

Click pics for slightly larger.

It's ladies' evening and the girls are all in pink:

1. Maremag is Spanish for “confusion” and she presents a trick of the eye:
Although I normally only like pink as found in the garden (see bottom thumbnails *), I fell in love with this pink home in Italy. Please note that the details (window frames, birds) are painted on the building, Trompe l'oeil style, French for "trick of the eye"!
2. Dragonstar - 63, 5 grown kids, and still mad about dragons! This isn’t a dragon though – it’s pink:

3. JMB is not so enamoured of pink but the girls are:
If there is one colour I really hate it is pink. None of the rooms in my house have anything pink nor does my closet contain a single item of pink apparel. But, as you can see below, it is a colour loved by many little girls, well except two.
One, my granddaughter, second from the right and the other one, next to her, the Birthday Girl, prefer blue which I also dislike but not so strongly. The party was held in a dance studio and the entertainment was a dance lesson. This is the lifestyle of the four year olds who live in Westchester County, New York.
4. Corey entered a different pic but I entered the one you see here:
Meanwhile, Welshcakes has been beating olives, Liz has had a bad machine day, Bel writes of the U-turn on marriage, Heather has Starbucks on the mind and Shani is glad another day is over:

[micro-control] oil, isis and lots of other goodies

Do you know the story behind the Statue of Enlightenment?

Woodstein had Deep Throat. I have a number of Anonymi.


One who, strangely, goes by the name of Anonymous, penned this on 19 October 2007 and it’s an interesting take on the present and future in Europe.


He makes a sound case – my only quibble being that he barely touches on the notion of the almost maniacal rush to remove liberty and I feel that this rush is the key.


And so in Lisbon, as our non-elected Prime Minister signs away a thousand years of evolved culture, philosophy, statutes and case law, perhaps, nay, it is imperative that we reflect, and try to gain a little perspective.

Some will say this monologue is politically biased. I make no apologies, I do not have the academic strictures of our host [he means me – Higham], nor do I wish them.

A debate is necessarily composed of opposite, or divergent, view points. If you start out balanced, in the inevitable trade-off, you lose. In any event, the facts that we will be seeking to assess are basically politically biased, so we have a precedent.

As our host most ably demonstrated last week, we live in a world, and a time, of rapidly coalescing power blocks. The need for this coalescence has been created by the rapid realisation that oil, a commodity that the entire world depends on for its continued existence in its current mode, is rapidly being depleted.

For many years (since the mid 1950s) this oil depletion has been recognised by “oil-men”, and a few geologists. Various US semi-clandestine agencies became aware of it in the 1960s, and in 1973 the entire western world was forcibly made to confront the reality of a constricted oil supply, and a nascent militant Islam.

We currently consume three barrels of oil for every one barrel that we discover, and this balanced situation has been such for many years.

We currently meet our consumption needs by the using and depletion of, the worlds giant oil-fields, discovered in the 40s, 50s, and to a lesser extent in the 60s.

This fact has been known by the world's political leaders for many years, and it has equally ably been denied and suppressed by the world's political leaders for the same number of years.

Very early in the process, intelligent and able American Politicians and Statistical Economists understood the significance of the “value added” to the national GDP by the efficient use of hydrocarbons, and that “efficiency measure” is still increasing to this day.

With the Middle-East rupture of old power alliances, the US stepped in to support the nascent house of Saud. Cheap, reliable supplies of oil were guaranteed in return for military muscle and defence/security commitments.

It was agreed that payments for oil would be made in US Dollars, thereby establishing the Dollar as the global currency for oil purchases.

This had the effect of forcing all oil importing nations to hold a proportion of their foreign currency reserves in Dollars, and eventually creating the Dollar as (almost) the World Currency of choice. Payments for imported oil, by all other nations also had the effect of limiting the recycling of Petro-Dollars to (mostly) the US, but in any event, to other globally traded/ trading, countries/currencies.

Economists would joke that the US economy was created for one thing, - the manufacture of Dollar Bills. This scenario rather limited foreign investment in smaller/non globally trading nations, although various structures were created to address this imbalance.

These structures have steadily become increasingly democratised, and in my opinion, increasingly less functional as they lose focus on what should be their core competencies. Strangely, or not, corruption seems to have grown in tandem with the democratisng/politicising levels.

This man will lead Britain into its brave new world - you can put your trust in him.

With stability in Saudi, the Islamic religion, with all its warts was encouraged, and with the House of Saud- Saudi Princes, (now numbering in excess of 5,000), becoming increasingly venal, hedonistic, and power intoxicated, Islamic traditions hardened, supported ironically by donations from many of those Princes through circuitous routes.

Islamic terrorism was born, seeded by the divides of wealth, and encouraged by self aggrandising preachers and almost 24/7 state propaganda from the time of the cradle, to redirect the seething animosity elsewhere and preserve a limited peace throughout Saudi.

A common enemy was found.

France, remembering the glory days of yesteryear grew increasingly aggrieved at the growth of US world dominance, after all, France had been instrumental in the true birth of the American nation, with many American Senior politicians (Masons almost to a man) visiting France immediately pre and post the French Revolution to meet with senior French Politicians (Masons almost to a man), having previously written the US Constitution. (Note, the true history of Freemasonry is not given by the Official Records held by Freemasons in London, largely for political, and at the time, life-threatening, reasons).

Auguste Bartholdi was an Italian sculptor. He sort a commission to build a giant statue of the Goddess Isis to overlook the up-coming building of the Suez Canal. His inspiration came from 1855 onwards when he departed on a journey to Egypt to study the architecture and statues.

In Egypt he met the French engineer, Ferdinand de Lesseps. They became lifetime friends. De Lesseps was negotiating French funding for the construction of the Suez canal, and so the idea of a gigantic statue, representing “enlightenment”, was born.

Ultimately, the Suez canal was not built at this time, due to Egyptian overborrowing from French bankers, and the resulting financial crisis.

Bartholdi's enthusiasm was transferred to other areas.

Edouard de Laboulaye was an authority on American Culture, and it was at his home in Paris that he discussed with Bartholdi the project of the Statue.

It was proposed as a “Statue of Liberty enlightening the World” for New York.

The Franco-American Union was established in 1875 to raise the necessary funds. Bartholdi’s cousin, the French Ambassador to the United States, was a Freemason, and a member of the “Franco-American Union”.

Other Freemason – Franco-American Union members were Henri Martin, the Count de Tocqueville, and Oscar de Lafayette. Bartholdi himself had been initiated into Freemasonry in 1875 at the Paris Lodge Alsace-Lorraine, and was raised as a Master Mason in 1880.

The engineer engaged for the project was Alexandre Gustave Eiffel, the French structural engineer who would go on to design the Eiffel Tower. The first 2 levels of his Tower, according to French engineer Jean Kerisel, are shaped like a Pyramid.

Not surprising then, since Eiffel was also a Mason. Eiffel was Well aware that in 1792, a Pyramid had been erected on the very same spot as the future Eiffel tower, on the Champs de Mars in Paris to commemorate the French revolution.

Bartholdi had spent much time studying and would doubtless be aware of the meaning of the Goddess Isis, and her association with the star Sirius.

Bartholdi went to America and arrived in July, 1875, New York. When entering, he knew immediately where to position the statue, on Bedloe’s Island.

You can put your trust in this lady, Americans - she'll bring you the American dream.

He carried a letter of Masonic introduction, and he met with many notables :- Henry Wadsworth Longfellow, Horace Greeley, Senator Charles Sumner, and President Ulysses S Grant. He titled the statue, “Liberty Enlightening the World”.

The project was a success.

On 5th August, 1984, a bronze plaque was fixed to the pedestal of the Statue to commemorate the 1854 placing of the cornerstone of the Statue, and present in 1854 were William A Brodie, Grand Master of Masons in the State of New York, Grand Lodge Members, Representatives of the United States and French Governments, plus Army and Navy officers.

The date of 5th August 1984 is significant.

In early Egypt C.3,000BC, the heliacal rising of the star Sirius, associated with rebirth, and resurrection, occurred on the summer solstice, 21st June.

Because of the precession of the equinoxes, the heliacal rising of Sirius, in C.30bc was on the 20th July.

When Bartholdi visited Egypt in the 1860s, from the latitude of the ancient city of Heliopolis, the heliacal rising of Sirius would have been on the 5th of August.

Rebirth and Resurrection.

At the ceremony in 1854, Grand Master William Brodie was asked why the Masonic fraternity had been called upon to lay the cornerstone of the Statue of Liberty. He replied

“No other organisation has ever done more to promote liberty, and to liberate men from the chains of ignorance and tyranny than Freemasonry”.

There are many other examples from this time period to show the friendship between the French and American nations carried via Freemasonry. It is a complex process sorting out the personalities.

I have dwelt at some length, because probably this aspect is unknown generally, and lost to the world, given the desperate attacks by both right, and particularly the left, on Freemasonry, and the re-writing and dumbing down of history. What we view as a secret society, was not.

Now, to return to more recent times.

The French nation, given its pride in its history (some would say, undeserved, given Napoleon’s defeats at British hands) and its (remaining) obsession with the Mahgreb became clearly worried about the American strength and influence, and commenced planning what we now call the EU, many decades ago.

Its form has transmogrified a few times since inception, but here we are, now, in this boat of many holes.

It was the French Valerie Giscard de Estaing who invited the Ayatolla Khomieni, while he was in exile from Iran, to reside in Paris, and it was there that he was free to finance and plan his revolution to overthrow the American backed Shah, (yes I know about the history of the Shah, - that is not the point - we will get there).

And it was the same man, Valerie Giscard de Estaing who wrote the EU Constitution documents that cause us to be here at this moment.

Nothing to fear - they're on your side.

Various, and numerous countries have been sucked in to the EU project, all willing at first, but as the intent widened in scope, and solidified in strength, populations began to worry.

Leaders, starry-eyed with accomplishment, bloated with power and ambition, greedy for the increasing salaries and expenses and lifestyle, increasingly ignored electorate wishes to “slowdown and think” and proceeded to seize, and centralise and consolidate power in their own, non-elected hands.

A new currency was born and a one-size-fits-all interest rate was administered from a new EU Central Bank. And all this, and more, to counter the power of America, but under the disguise of “never another European War”.

America had satellites, for both commercial and military use. GPS evolved for commercial use, from military use.

The EU decided that the EU needed one, - hence Galileo. The EU struggled to fund, and given its intent to undermine American strength, sold knowledge and access to China and India. The EU realised it didn’t have the ability to complete the task.

China is now building and launching satellites with GPS abilities and more. The EU moreover relied on Galileo for its ambitious plans to digitally control its citizens. It looks increasingly likely that a visit, cap in hand, to the US is planned.

Pray they say no.

When the walls came down in East Germany, the entire world could witness at first hand, the poverty, hunger, lack of spirit, lack of quality of life, endured under a central command economy, - a Communist Economy, a failed economy. The accomplishments were hollow, and at great expense.

But that was before the Commodities Boom. And what created the Commodities Boom?

First China, then India and South America, threw off doctrinaire political restraints and embracing Capitalism, or at least a version of Mercantilism.

China is now engaged in a global acquisition of commodities using methods that western companies, no matter what their size, cannot compete with.

Requests for commodity extraction, made to all point of the compass, are wrapped up in “Infrastructure Development”, or hospital provisions, or (low level) technology transfers. Were western companies to approach business in this way, some august body would proceed, with large headlines, to examine their ethics, and prosecute.

Russia, post the Commodities Boom, is a different animal. Now, given the margins on commodities, and its profitable exports of such, it is able to repay its Paris debts ahead of schedule, and engage in almost naked energy blackmail with its customers.

Its military proliferation throughout the Middle East and, ergo, its proxy states, is also a direct challenge to American power. European, and British governments have been particularly short sighted and stupid in their reliance on Russian energy and honesty.
Even Churchill warned them.

Now the pigeons come home to roost, and there is precious little that can be done in the medium term. We still sit and talk about nuclear power generation. Ambitious plans for estuary wave electricity generation are announced with great fanfare, but they are years away, maybe decades, and the problem is now!

Meanwhile Russia increasingly flexes its military muscles.

The import into the EU of millions of younger immigrants is required in large part, to pay the pension commitments, made by the state, to an ever-aging population. Politicians of all colours have steadfastly refused to appreciate how equity markets function, and have managed state pension funds on a cash-in-cash-out basis, - there is no invested pool.

This is fine when the population is expanding. When it is static, or falling, there is a problem. This lead initially to regulations facilitating the increasing employment of female workers to add to the pool of workers paying taxes, and NI.

This created the further problem of a more rapidly decreasing birth-rate, so we now import workers. This in turn creates the problems that todays bloggers revel in, which I need not dwell on.

American aggression in Iraq is plainly oil based, the demand for scarce resources. And Iran, if it happens, will be for the same reasons. Iran is foolhardy, and is playing a dangerous game of poker.

You can always pray to the equivalent, relative g-dhead in this piece of stone at the U.N.

I firmly believe Peak Oil is here, or very near, and the US administration is clearly worried sick. Both Iraq and Iran have large, unexplored, unused resources, both in insecure, unstable, anti-American hands.

There are some rumours that output from Iraqi oilfields is disappearing into a pipeline that ultimately disguises and feeds Saudi quoted output, (yes oils have different signatures and are distinguishable to a refinery techie, but it can be done).

If that is the case well…my suspicions are well founded. Needless to say, should such become widely known in the markets, before Iraq can be stabilized, then there would be wide-scale meltdown in both equities, and currencies, compared to the currencies of the commodity rich countries currencies.

And therein lies another explanation for Russian arms proliferation!

I note in passing that both oil and gold are at, or near, record highs in dollar terms. Russian proliferation and sabre rattling are designed to deny Middle East oil to American aggression, or at the very least be expensive in terms of blood and treasure.

The Russians want the American market for themselves. They are also seeking to establish an OPEC equivalent for LNG, with countries in North Africa, and in central/south east Asia. The “Stans” have oodles of energy resources.

We are on the threshold of the third world war, the war for energy.

Last week, our host dealt well with the effects of secretive, world wide organisations. I have my views, but suffice it to say, these entities will follow the money, and are therefore predictable to an extent.

I will not enter that field.

However, two facts impact our immediate concern - that of the coming EU. Facts that the politicians have overlooked.

If Peak Oil has arrived, and it will be because the monster fields in Saudi begin to decline, given the 3 to 1 equation [he would have, if he’d remembered but I know what he’s talking about- Higham] mentioned earlier, there is little logic, from the West’s point of view, in the ongoing support for the house of Saud.

True, there are historical family ties with the house of Bush, but we may just be witnessing a split with the increasing differences adopted by Saudi, and US negotiators in the Israeli/Palestine negotiations.

“Gently does” it is the key.

Keep movements gradual, keep equity markets stable. Stabilise Iraq. If the Saudi decline is real, the 5,000+ Princes will seek to preserve their standard of venality and greed, and the first to suffer will be the financing of terror throughout the world, with the Princes suddenly forced to confront their own vulnerability in their own land, given the phased withdrawal of American protection.

The possible exception to the cessation of terrorism is the poppy-field funded Taliban/Pakistan terror. Further more, the EU agreement with Saud, concerning unrequited immigration and the suffusion of Islam and Sharia throughout the EU can contractually cease!

This may not solve the EU pension problem, but all the quoted reasons for enhanced security throughout the EU will disappear,and a smart electorate will legitimately demand the dismantling of the newly forming structures and hardware and software designed for such control.

This in turn would remove vast volumes of sand from the cogs of the economic machine, and greatly improve nationwide efficiencies.

That I consider this to be unlikely may be a reflection of my opinion of politicians, but it may also be very true.

One of the side effects of Peak Oil, and aggravated by the proliferation activities of Russia in the Middle East, is the ongoing, and increasing Western use of agricultural products, Maize, Corn, and Oil bearing seeds (Jatropha notwithstanding) for conversion into hydrocarbons for power generation.

Troops come home

The diversion of food products to these products not only increases world food prices and diverts agricultural land away from agriculture, but also hastens the onset, together with increased desertification (200 million starving in a few years) of peak food.

China, India, Brazil, etc, as they move up the wealth ladder, are demanding diets similar to the West. On a planetary scale, with current technologies and water supplies, this is impossible. Prices will rise.
The rich will eat meat (8 to 1 by weight conversion rate from food to meat for cows) and drive their cars, the poor will starve.

So, what do we do?

The EU is energy deficient, a net importer, and vulnerable to economic exploitation from unstable suppliers (except Norway). Alternate generation methods are either non-starters (hydrogen) or development years away (waves).

We have chosen to hitch our carriage to an area (Middle East) that is rapidly failing in its only asset, oil. And we have chosen a structure, (or at least the cretinous politicians have!) at the hands of de Estaing, based on a failed state-central command economy - communism!

Aided and abetted by the malevolent use of technology to micro control and monitor the populations. Can we do any worse?

Well yes!

On entry to the EU, our State held Pension funds go into the EU pot. Our underfunding per head (as a result of Gordon activities, there was previously no underfunding) is roughly one thirtieth of the level of EU underfunding.

So our pensions go down the EU black hole. Given the self voting rights of the increasing bureaucracy, at all levels, this can only get worse! You think 20 million in the next 20 years will solve that problem? Folks, they’re lying through their teeth.

Sarkozzeee has realised this, and is taking steps. Too little, too late, and bribed by power and the gravy train, I fear his realisation will not transfer to action.

The UK has many, many years of COAL still unmined, and at current oil prices it is economic to extract.

New technologies developed before the Maggie war use powdered coal, a very explosive mixture to achieve combustion almost as clean as gas. Nuclear is still on the table. We are plain and simple fools, too intent on social engineering and professional victimhood to see the killer on the doorstep!

You have to ask, The EU, even at this point, is a failed state. Do we need the EU?

The position of the US is unclear.

A few years hence, she may be self sufficient in oil, but at an environmental price, or higher cost. The same is true for Canada. Canada has Uranium, and WATER (the probable scenario for the next war). The US has vast hot deserts, and it only needs a few percentage points increase in solar cell efficiency to achieve energy nirvana, (given a redesign of the energy grid). Satellite based solar reflectors are not beyond the abilities here.

But she may go to war in Iran, and then all bets are off.

The first step is a referendum.

The second is the political recognition of the economic/structural realities above.

The third is to take action on the second.

And there is the problem. Given the mindset of current politics, the economic illiteracy of the leaders, and the clear lack of an identifiable charismatic leader, and the ongoing inertial momentum, I see no movement from the existing descent into, ahem, sub optimal, micro-controlled existence.

I have shown that behind the scenes action by motivated wealthy persons, (Masons in the example), had a significant impact on the development of nations. The visual monuments are just that, monuments, but they speak of behind the scenes cross fertilisation of ideas, ideas born out of realism.

It may just be that enough wealthy individuals may become concerned enough to effect a change of political heart and direction, in the EU.

The EU is a voracious consumer of taxes to fund its corruption and inefficiencies. The flight of capital, and resultant loss of taxation bases may shout louder than the current 70% of the population,

Who can tell?

The EU is currently hammering Billy Gates, with threats of others in line. But these actions take too long.

About 75 years, failing legal moves, is my estimation, unless something dramatic happens in the next few months…

I feel Anon is too generous here regarding the years we have left to us. There is a recognizable, almost manic drive, a push to meet certain loony, spiritual watersheds and hence the haste to have things in place on time.

Hence the raggedness, the slight lack of care in covering tracks.
Anon’s mention of 5th August, 1984, is not accidental. How many times have these supposedly all-knowing people made grand world plans, factored everything in, only to see them go awry through human folly?

So, they have some dates with destiny this time round - let the battle commence.


You can put your trust in Pascal - he knows everything.


Notes
Part 1
Part 2
Part 3
Part 4
Part 5
Part 6
Part 7