Thursday [1 to 5]

Morning all.

5.  Haiku

Pots, kettles, black

4.  Ian J

What follows Ukraine? ask Helena!

https://helenaglass.net/2022/05/17/ukraine-somalia-harvesting-resources/

3.  DAD 

... and something I shan't speculate about before breakfast.

2.  Man from Another Place

a.  Del Bigtree on whether CDC can prove that vaxxes do not cause new variants

b.  Documents on Pfizer, fraud and trials

c.  Speculation on Weaponized Bird Flu Next Pandemic?

d.  For Your Health

1.  The Daily Sceptic

... illustrates how fragmented are the different aspects of the whole Cv thing - isolation of, testing, masks, lockdowns, jabs, punishments, callous inhumanity woven in by 'authorities', true political purpose, the sickening of kids.

What drew this site's writers together was agreement to be against lockdowns, hence the name of the blog, but that's as far as agreement went.  Toby Young who started the site was writing so many 'cuckeries' in with the anti-lockdown stance, largely accepting the rest of the narrative as a given.  Will Jones is more neutral or overall sceptic, plus honest:

Many have raised the alarm about a new WHO pandemic treaty. However, as I’ve noted previously (and as Michael Senger notes here), there isn’t a new pandemic treaty on the table. Rather, there are amendments to the existing treaty, the International Health Regulations 2005, plus other recommendations (131 in all) put forward in a report from the Working Group on Strengthening WHO Preparedness and Response to Health Emergencies. 

Most of these amendments and recommendations relate to information and resource sharing and preparation for future pandemics; none of them directly interferes with state sovereignty in the sense of allowing the WHO to impose or lift measures. However, that doesn’t mean they’re not dangerous, as they endorse and codify the appalling errors of the last two years, which began with China’s Hubei lockdown on January 23rd 2020.

This is not to impugn Toby Young for honesty, it's more a case of too readily buying the other aspects of the narrative as read. As for the rights and wrongs on the various aspects, the online hosts of major platforms have their own view aligned with WHO/govts.  I say nothing whatever about that.