Sunday, June 27, 2021

The disinformation on vaxxes is a massive Nuremberg crime

Feel free to drop anything on politics under comments here - it's not nameday but it's still live for politics if you wish. Next post is demi-jazz.

Think it was from DR.  It was originally scheduled for OoL, hence the text, but then I swapped, running the HS2 over there and the vaxxes here.  Trouble is, it's singing to the choir over here.  Never mind, let's still do it:

https://unbekoming.substack.com/p/a-letter-to-my-two-adult-kids-vaccines

"I have agonised about this for quite some time and felt I didn’t have enough information to write earlier. That has changed, there is enough coming out now to say with a good degree of confidence that the spike protein the vaccines are designed to generate in the body, do not stay locally in the arm (as intended or thought), but float around the body and can cause damage all over the place."

If you go through the hundreds of links here under the nameday posts. there is most certainly evidence of what it does in the long run [consensus is a few months to two years], plus an enormous amount of disinformation poured out by the agenda-istas, such that people are severely misinformed in contravention of the Nuremberg code and Hippocratic oath.

The problems include:


1.  Those for whom there can be no significant benefit, given the dangers of the experimental spiker and for whom to take it is irresponsible at a minimum.  Included here are children and we're seeing now even young people showing heart issues as a result.

2.  Those for whom it is most certainly contra-indicated, e.g. for myself with heart and respiratory issues, already on other meds.  These can be either elderly or younger.  One group who should not go anywhere near it are women - the indications on ovaries etc. are horrific and the data is being hushed up.

Then comes the question of for whom is it ok?  No one but there are certain ages and groups who might see it as the better option.

1.  Men in their 50s hanging onto their jobs and if the nazis in that job threaten, even obliquely, if they refuse to be jabbed.  That's not to be sneezed at.  Women are in an invidious position in the workforce because it's far worse for them, on the mass of info coming out, much summarised at N.O.

2.  The elderly who don't have that long to go anyway.  I have a friend whose elderly mum had the jab and sorry but if she plans to live past two years, then that argument is poor. However, if it gets her past the nazis and into her favourite shops without question, let's her move around in town etc. for political reasons, well ... that's her choice in the final analysis.

Against that is the bullying - I know right now of an elderly lady with other conditions who is being coerced, even subtly - this generation were always compliant in the sense of "doing the right thing". She still defends her own local but that local is still subject to NHS directives from above and the whole thrust is to cajole at a minimum or offer alternatives which look worse for an elderly person unread. For one well read, it's still a decision.  We are debating whether to be jabbed or not and yet Hancock said that those unjabbed should not have access to the NHS.  

If that's not govt coercion, then what is?  In other words, removing choice and the nazis who don't  know any better than to parrot the global line go Full Karen on those who have bothered to look at what doctors are saying - people like Frontline Doctors, then Hodgkinson etc.

Lastly, there is the question of the body's natural immunity adjusting to new viruses and many other things, helped along by topical drugs such as HCQ and Ivermectin - the massive campaign against people even knowing about these is a crime in itself.  These Frankenjabs replace the body's natural immune system, whatever the NHS docs are coerced or brainwashed to say. Once again, there's a whole range of things coming out right now about it - 62 more people dead while the Hancock affair was grabbing headlines.

Anyway, that's it from me on the topic - one can but lead a horse to water ...

5 comments:

  1. Just done the calc as per Risk Calculator in that link.

    1.0079% associated death cv
    0.9873% being hospitalised.

    Not bad.

    ReplyDelete
  2. As mentioned at the top of this post:

    “It was originally scheduled for OoL, hence the text, but then I swapped, running the HS2 over there and the vaxxes here.”

    The HS2 is a more OoL article, plus there were reasons of niceness to not leave this one over there. Better all round.

    Thanks to the Inoreader user for whom the article still came up. It would on a reader because it was posted, meaning the feed went out at OoL, then I sent it to draft. So neither enmy action nor cock up, just one of those things.

    The reason I could not post the comment was it was Anon, with no moniker. Sorry ’bout that.

    ReplyDelete
  3. The compromised immune systems could create a mass flu outbreak with pressure for all age groups to start getting regular flu jabs every autumn. Once this becomes world wide isn't it a nice windfall for the drug companies and government control freaks.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Steve

    Ivermectin Treats and Prevents Covid-19

    https://bird-group.org/meta-analysis-paper/?fbclid=IwAR2sgy9WyXaKSilRmMZLXS3drdv4F072MPCJ0HMyBYUHChV6znghvB3N-_g

    ReplyDelete
  5. Scotty from Marketing (PM) has just announced that vax is compulsory for aged care workers. Running a book on which occupation will be next.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.