3. Thought this interesting
That's a perfect example of using the screenshot without a link, an issue mentioned in the next post. The reasoning is that the statement alone IS the news, all the rest is details which would require signing up and that's too much of a pain. Plus the details could be found by other ferreting in search engines. It's not of sufficient controversy that it would go into the suppressed category, such as the efficacy of vaccines or not.
2. Shall take this up in a later post
Cost of 90 day supply of insulin went from $300 to $2800 in one month.
1. Oops
The study found that between March and December 2020, face mask orders reduced infection rates by 1.5 percent over the rolling periods of two months each. The masks were 0.5 percent effective in the first 20 days of the mandates and less than 2 percent effective after 100 days.
JohnM de France
ReplyDeleteFigures for the yellow card scheme of reporting problems UK are to be found at annex 1 of the Government site.....
https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/coronavirus-covid-19-vaccine-adverse-reactions/coronavirus-vaccine-summary-of-yellow-card-reporting
#1: the headline talks about masks but the study talks about mask orders. Plain different things.
ReplyDeleteThe natter about 1.5% is probably bollocks: no rough-and-ready observational research could pick up such a trifling difference. I'll bet the study meant 1.5 percentage points.
There will have been all sorts of confounding variables ignored - so the study may well be worthless anyway. Still, by some miracle, it reported results in just the direction that the CDC would have wanted. Trebles all round.
Steve
ReplyDelete3. Thought this interesting
Reality check:
EV subsidies, fantasies and realities
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2021/03/09/ev-subsidies-fantasies-and-realities/