You know, my first thought was to put 'he would say that' as the heading and then I thought I'd put 'shocking then, not today' and then I went with what I have.
Now, which one of them said it and who was the 'gentleman' it was being said about? No peeking.
In America we are familiar with the name Profumo, and that he may have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, ah, very frequently. But who are the dames, exactly? Because I'd like to have committed a crime with the brunette.
Yes. I would say that, wouldn't I?
ReplyDeleteYes! Shocking then, but not so shocking now.
ReplyDeleteYou know, my first thought was to put 'he would say that' as the heading and then I thought I'd put 'shocking then, not today' and then I went with what I have.
ReplyDeleteNow, which one of them said it and who was the 'gentleman' it was being said about? No peeking.
Mandy said "'e would say...". I assume it was about Profumo, but it was all such a long time ago.
ReplyDeleteMandy said it, yes, about Lord Astor who denied her allegations; this was at the trial of Steven Ward. Profumo of course.
ReplyDeleteI couldn't possibly comment ;-)
ReplyDeleteIf Profumo was around now he would have still resigned, but he'd be back in office within 6 months.
ReplyDeleteIn America we are familiar with the name Profumo, and that he may have been in the wrong place at the wrong time, ah, very frequently. But who are the dames, exactly? Because I'd like to have committed a crime with the brunette.
ReplyDeleteThe one nearest is Mandy Rice-Davies. The further is Christine Keeler and the year is 1963.
ReplyDeleteRead about it all here.
Incidentally,
Mandy has a website.
Cherie, Ross - yes.
ReplyDelete