Saturday, May 02, 2009

[texas] just one of many in the new nau

Theo makes some good points about Texas, including:

Maybe you don't know it, but Texas is the only state with a legal right to secede from the Union... (Reference the Texas-American Annexation Treaty of 1848.)

OK, now we'd agree as far as saying that Obama would be incapable of handling such a move and also note the other secessionist moves of late, e.g. Montana and California. Note the mood of unrest, e.g. in the Tea Parties as well.

Now, here's where you need to be a bit more clever than your average bear. Some of you will recall the SPPNA [I have many articles on it, accessible through my search window - here's one] and the control being handed over to the NAAC on March 21st this year. Right, now given the mindset of the CFR and assorted bozos, it is very much in their interests for the unrest in the former U.S.A. to take place [just how many pages of quotes would you like?].

After all, they are looking towards the NAU.

Watch closely, people and see history being made as the U.S. Constitution becomes an irrelevance.

4 comments:

  1. "Texas is the only state with a legal right to secede from the Union": come now, it's likely that they all have; he means a legal right made explicit in a treaty. As you'll recall, the last time some of them used that right they were attacked and, eventually, crushed. (Though I have to say that they were wallies to give Lincoln a pretext for attacking them.)

    ReplyDelete
  2. Here y'are.

    http://www.frontporchrepublic.com/?p=2879

    hattip: 2 Blowhards

    ReplyDelete
  3. Ah, now that's interesting and puts things in perspective. I think what the Theo article was saying was that it is immediately possible for Texas, whereas the rest have to go through a process before they get to the secession.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.