Sunday, September 23, 2007

[ageing] life change now

Mousie writes of the people who look after the elderly, including some [and Mousie uses far stronger language than I], who are not fit to do so.

As always, whilst we feel angry about this treatment, we also cast a glance at our own old age and shudder. There, but for the Grace … Having now lost parents and step-parent and having lost touch with any other remnants of what could be called family, you could say death or the street will remain at a distance only until the mind and body start to go.

Who knows when that will be?

Juliet runs a post on living to a hundred and I wonder why that's of interest to her. To me, I can't imagine anything worse than living that long, given that western aches and niggles set in about 50 to 60 and the deterioration of the mind follows on after that. I don't want to carry that baggage over another 40 years.

She mentions that the longest living people in the world are the Uighurs of China and she has two fascinating links you can follow. Whilst she zeroes in on their diet:

Uighur food is characterized by meat - mutton, beef, camel, chicken, goose; vegetables - carrots, tomatoes, onions, peppers, eggplants, celeries etc.; dairy foods; and various fruits ...

some other factors like "weather, environment, and people's life habits and physical quality" are also noted but there are things here which haven't been spelt out fully. One article quotes "experts" saying it is related to diet. The classic western mistake over and over again and the reason the tone in the rest of the post is a little angry.

In other words, westerners are encouraged to think that if they go over to this diet, after trying the mediterranean diet, then all will be well and they'll live longer. This conveniently glosses over the other quite real reasons they live long:

1. the physical makeup of a people long used to austerity for countless generations in a survival of the fittest scenario. This is not the average obese North American or increasingly obese Brit;

2. the mental toughness - working in the fields till 80 or 90 is more an indicator of this than of long life;

3. simplicity - no hi-tech, sedentary, door-to-door-car, hush power, all-mod-cons lifestyle but life made uncomplicated and much closer to the earth than the dislocated western societies;

4. spiritual harmony combining their Maker [whom bloggers in particular continue to insist does not exist], four or more generations of extended family and a village atmosphere of community which leads to well-being;

5. exercise - yes, exercise. Look at those hills in the picture and the answer is there - they have to walk and work;

6. nature itself - instead of little boxes bounded by concrete roads, car and industrial fumes;

7. then diet - simple, unprocessed and in season.

But to think for one second that just doing the diet bit is going to slow the march to debilitation is self-delusion. All of it has to go together in a harmonious whole. Then it doesn't matter if they eat more bread, more fried food, more of the vilified dairy products - it's all swamped by the other aspects of the lifestyle. If you want this, you can't pick some aspects and pass on others, say N4 and N5. No, all of them have to be working together in a harmonious whole.

Contrast this with today's west - increasingly godless people, enslaved to material gain, living in exceedingly unhealthy cities, more and more people lacking common decency and courtesy [you can see it immediately in the way they talk or blog], eating a fatty, salty, sugary diet and deluding themselves that a ham and salad sandwich is healthy, having lost touch with nature in a day to day context [as distinct from the Sunday ramble], living either alone or with the same sex, lacking the perseverance to make relationships work, lacking the mental toughness to survive and hankering for a faster, more convenient and more comfortable lifestyle.

Plus drinking.

Nothing wrong with drinking in its place but it must be in its place - in its context. The land in that photo is Shangri-la whilst, for me, living in a polluted city on a low salary is hell on earth. So where am I on that continuum? Possibly halfway along but there's still a long way to go before longevity becomes a desirable goal.

You'll possibly be angry with me for writing these things. Sorry.

7 comments:

  1. I think that if the food you eat, your weight/bodyshape and longevity weren't connected, this world would've been a much happier place!

    ReplyDelete
  2. James I didn't realise there were medical benefits to believing in God- is that all Gods or just Christianity, what about branches of Christianity!

    Your points are interesting though- there was a wonderful study of some Pacific island somewhere where they lived longer than anyone else on earth, and the reason was that they lived basically as peasants but thanks to the introduction of modern medicine with medicine. So their bodies were incredibly healthy and they had doctors. Obviously the next generation aren't as healthy- they use cars instead of walking for instance.

    Its interesting as well to think that we are not built say for sitting down most of the day but for standing or lying- there are all sorts of ways in which modern life is unnatural to us. Though it brings great benefits!

    ReplyDelete
  3. If you've got all your faculties , then it's a worthy enough goal. Here it is said that if you want to live to be 100, you should settle in the nearby town of Ispica. What is wrong with living alone? - It's better than living with Mr ? Ms Wrong!

    ReplyDelete
  4. Kareno - clean air, good diet, happy relationships. Body shape needn't come into it.

    Tiberius - Obviously the next generation aren't as healthy... It really is a problem now in the west, more so than, say, the 60s.

    Welshcakes - What is wrong with living alone? It means we're not together. :)

    ReplyDelete
  5. James, I spent some of yesterday in hospital with an older relative suddenly taken ill,and so better and less better ways of ageing has been on my mind.

    I have a great aunt who is ninety-four and I'd like for her to reach a hundred and to receive her birthday message from the Queen. I doubt she needs my advice on diet and longevity - she seems to be doing very well without it. Fish has long been a major part of her diet, and that mainly dover sole, which one of my cousins catches in nets and in abundance on the Cardiff foreshore. No convenience foods, ever. Thanks for linking my post, I'm pleased you found the subject interesting.

    ReplyDelete
  6. So many different points to consider. I think a lot of it can be considered luck and good genes.
    My MIL lived till 104! She lived in her own apartment in a retirement village until 101 when she became too frail to look after herself. Sadly the last 3 years of her life were very unpleasant as she slowly died from colon cancer which they could not treat conventionally because of her great age.
    Having arrived at senior citizenship I do not look forward to the future as it can only be less pleasant than today as our bodies and sometimes our minds move out of our control. So let's enjoy each day as it comes.
    regards
    jmb

    ReplyDelete
  7. Genes are definitely the first port of call in the factors.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.