Friday, July 13, 2007

[name change] let's go to iraq


Two opposed views of the same incident:

Here

… and here

Personally, I think the copter crew were within their rights and those "farmers" were up to no good. Despite a number of blunders and some downright stupidity in Iraq, I can't see how the Apache straf falls into that category:

A senior Army official who viewed the tape said the pilots had the legal right to kill the men because they were carrying a weapon. He said there were no ground troops in the area and if the Apache pilots had let the three Iraqis go, the men might have gone on to kill American troops.

Keane agreed. "Those weapons were obviously not being pointed at them in particular, but they [the three Iraqis] are using those weapons in their minds for lethal means and they [the Apache pilots] have a right to interfere with that," he said.

Anthony Cordesman, an ABCNEWS defense consultant who also viewed the tape, said the Apache pilots would have had a much clearer picture of the scene than what was recorded on the videotape. He also said they would have had intelligence about the identity of the men in the vehicles. "They're not getting a sort of blurred picture. They have a combination of intelligence and much better imagery than we can see."

Now we'll never know.


2 comments:

  1. it doesn't really matter whether those "farmers" were farmers or not, the US army's going to get bad publicity for whatever it does. it's not their actions that matter, but the fact that they went to iraq.

    ReplyDelete
  2. When you serve you do your duty.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.