Wednesday, April 25, 2007

[north american union] notes on the cfr

A few of us were having a nice coffee and discussing the NAU and the European Constitution yesterday.

The general consensus was that both will happen - the EU will get its army and central intelligence and NA will get its SPP. The questions are: "Why?" and: "Why now?"

The U.S. has an oil crisis. They've tried the Middle-East, they've tried Russia through ExxonMobil and the Japanese. On the other hand, Canada has huge 'secret' reserves and Mexico has also discovered reserves. The SPPNA is therefore the answer.

The waning U.S. hegemony could thus also be halted and the SPPNA could stand up to a renewed Europe, which is hell bent on arming itself and bringing in draconian legislation both pan-EU and within individual member nations, e.g. the latest UK 'breaking and entering' provisions.

As Angela Merkel warned - we can no longer take peace for granted. There's war on the way and a population is far more amenable to draconian measures in a wartime situation than in a peacetime.

Then there is the question of China and Russia. Russia will be kept happy and basically left alone, to ensure supplies. China is hellbent on creating seaports and land routes and generally building up - but for what?

Into this comes the CFR.

Involved on both sides of the Atlantic, their acquiescence to a war could only be for commercial reasons, unless of course it is just out of a sense of mischief, which could only be so if their master was someone we can't name.

Some have pointed out that the CFR is an American organization. True but its members are cross-integrated into Europe e.g. the high priest Kissinger and many names less well known to the general public. The Trilateral Commission, for example crosses country boundaries.

Martin Kelly notes the line in the NAU report:

“It is also essential that throughout a pandemic all borders and major roads remain open…”

… and from a British angle, quotes David Harrison, one of the last real journalists at the 'Sunday Telegraph' ... [who] notes that:

"Many more jobs could go abroad as big companies seek to minimise the potentially devastating impact of the virus that has already travelled from the Far East to Turkey, on the doorstep of Europe."

One should only now expect the United Kingdom's corporatocrats to take the opportunities presented to them by human disaster in order to further reduce their cost bases.

Lastly, I have a mixed attitude to the CFR. whilst they're without doubt one of the front organizations facilitating evil policy in the world, nevertheless, their predictions are worth noting - they do seem to get it right. I wonder how right they are about this prediction:

Charles A. Kupchan, CFR’s top Europe expert, says Nicolas Sarkozy “is in pretty good shape” for the presidential runoff and it remains to be seen if Royal can cut substantially into the centrist vote to emerge victorious.

On both issues, let's now wait and see.

Original article is here.

5 comments:

  1. If it was all about oil James, the US has more potential oil than Canada or Mexico :)

    ReplyDelete
  2. So what's it all about then, this consolidation and arming and making stronger, to the point of breaking traditonal nations? Could it just be a global agenda?

    ReplyDelete
  3. It's your puppy James, remember I don't agree that it's going to happen.

    The EU was a socialist idea, the NAU is a similar idea.

    Much more nany-state laws will have to be passed before the NAU could be considered reality.

    Remember the EU was about economy, yet that's not what the EU does.

    ReplyDelete
  4. James,

    "Why?" and: "Why now?"

    Why? It’s because larger scale populations require greater homogeneity to insure success and peaceful enterprise.

    Why now? Not now, in the future when things get more complex. This is just a ramping up stage. We all know you can hardly get two people to agree on anything more or less millions of differing minds.

    “Involved on both sides of the Atlantic, their acquiescence to a war could only be for commercial reasons.”

    Why do you assume this?

    WM

    ReplyDelete
  5. For the reason, Winfred, that there is no cogent reason for any war just now, least of all between the SPPNA and the EU.

    The Muslim world is another matter of course.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.