Monday, May 14, 2007

[obsession] renovating the book

Obsession was the first in my trilogy of four books, loosely termed 'romantic thrillers' and the most problematic, as it was started 12 years ago and was heavily based on my first three years over here.

The others, based in France, Britain and Israel, were easier to write because they were more fictional. Obsession was less literary and more factual although the facts had all been scrambled and the main character named Hugh.

Many of the dialogues were real, including the following and I've just been remembering the episode and having a good chuckle. Here Hugh and a young lady slip away to the forest from a giant feast at a country resort. That was really her name too:

"All right – so what was next, he asked himself and she possibly did too. They could go into the forest – yes, they could do that – but it was ultra-dark, with the half moon behind the clouds; plus it was cold.

He suggested it but she shook her head - stupid idea anyway, he reflected and then she surprised him. ‘I’m frightened of the forest.’

‘You – frightened? But you’re a Russian!’

‘Why can’t Russians be frightened?’

‘Because they - they can’t. Well, at least, I didn’t think so.’

‘There are wolves in that forest, Hugh.’

‘Really? I thought they’d killed them all or driven them away or something.’

She shook her head. ‘My grandmother told me about them.’

He looked at her sharply. This was a woman in her late twenties who’d surely seen life and here she was speaking of grandmothers and wolves.

‘Don’t worry, Alla, I’m here. They’re not going to get you.’

She dropped her eyes and chuckled but still held his hand. By now they'd reached the end of the approach road. ‘Do you think we should walk back? The others might be waiting for us.’

‘Are you bored?’

‘I’m cold.’ Another surprise.

‘How can you be cold? You’re Russian.’

‘I’m human. You have some strange ideas about us.’

‘I’m learning fast. All right, let’s walk back.’

She snaked her arm through his and he was surprised again – it was something Anya had never done. He liked the feel of her long, thin, gloved fingers clutching his upper arm and wished he had a tadge more muscle to impress her, thick coat or no thick coat.

‘Hugh!’ she gripped his arm more tightly.

‘What?’

‘Over there – in the trees. Do you think -?’

‘Stay here. I’ll find out,’ he ordered. ‘Hold on tight to the lamp post, Alla, malyenkaya. They’ll never touch you if you do that.’

He plunged into the forest, rambled about for a while, then came back to her. ‘Nope, no wolves whatsoever.’

She visibly relaxed and as they sauntered back, she asked what things frightened him.

‘Boring a girl like you so she doesn’t want to stay with me.’

‘No, be serious. What frightens you?’

‘Occult things. The Enemy.’

She didn’t know what to say to that so wisely, she didn’t."

[old poll down] new poll up

Old poll

Is cancelling a sports tour to an iniquitous regime ever justified?

# Of course 65%

# Never 10%

# Sometimes 25%

20 votes total

Comments

Posted by Lord Nazh on May 13, 2007 at 5:03 pm.

Should be only 2 answers to this poll James

The question doesn't leave room for a maybe.

Sometimes equal yes the way the question is written (notice you can't put an equal sign in these things o.O)


Posted by James on May 12, 2007 at 9:33 am.

Yes, Dave. I think that's so. This is how it went with SA in the end.


Posted by Dave Petterson on May 12, 2007 at 8:12 am.

It needs to be part of a package not a stand alone boycott. All aid should be cut off otherwise it is not worth it.


Posted by James on May 11, 2007 at 2:50 pm.

It would be nice to keep them separate but when someone like Mugabe is clearly using the tour to make money to maintain his regime - it's a hard call.

New poll

Could a Fiji type blogger shutdown happen in your country?

# Yes

# No

# Maybe later

Poll is in the left sidebar.

[war on bloggers] first fiji and then …

We don’t live in Fiji under a military dictatorship. Yet. The big worry is whether this can actually, technically, be possible:

The military in Fiji is moving to shut down access to anti-government weblogs after unsuccessful attempts to find those responsible for the sites.

Senior military commander Colonel Pita Driti has told Pacific Radio that access to the sites would be closed down this afternoon. He said they asked that access be cut off to the blog for "national security" reasons.

Asked whether FINTEL would block access to the blogspot.com website, where most of the anti-government sites are hosted, he said the company may have little choice.

The United States has claimed: "On a radio talk show on December 22, Bainimarama stated that if pro-democracy activists did not shut their mouth, the military would shut it for them."

The implication is clear. Blogspot is hosted out of America but Internet service is local. I'm not technically aware enough to know but is it possible for a government of one country to shut down the website of another country?

If so, then the blogosphere is only free until someone decides to shut it down.

[genetic modification] is there a problem

This news article was anti-GM. The 'colourful' terminology has been expunged by this blogger and just the arguments remain. Hopefully.

GM is the insertion of a gene from one species to another. This is not selective or cross-breeding of plants and animals, practised for eons.

Rather, it is the radical re-arranging of the genetic building blocks of life, like decoding the human genome — undoubtedly a milestone in curing illnesses.

But that's not to be confused with what is happening down on the farm … because ultimately it's about the food we eat — the right to choose whether to eat genetically modified food or not.

The debate is also about which corporations will control the world's food.

The claimed advantages of GM crops include higher yields and oil content and herbicide resistance … as well as the potential to create crops that use less water.

On the other hand, we should be clear about one thing: GM is bankrolled by multi-national corporations that stand to make huge money.

Is the bankrolling in itself a problem? Is the main problem with climate change too that it's been backed by the big money? Is everything the big money does necessarily evil?

Sunday, May 13, 2007

[mothers] can't live without them

[country quiz 4] try these ten

1] 332 islands, sugarcane, trying to ban bloggers right now, ethnic tensions with Indians, 94% literacy, good rugby players;

2] Hereditary constitutional monarchy, on the east bank of the Rhine, blacklisted in 2000 for money laundering, regent runs it;

3] Constitutional monarchy, 1.5 million visitors a year, tax shelter, UN member, heir is an issue, nice beaches;

4] Not yet sovereign, legislature is called States, tax haven, divided into twelve parishes, further divided into vingtaines;

5] Northeast Kurils Russian-occupied, created by sun goddess, new PM not long ago, 174 airports, golf a rich man's sport [Japan];

6] Never fought Britain, 3 rivers divide the country, intrepid explorers, lost its Indian Empire, another huge country still speaks its language;

7] Allegedly mafia controlled, refuses the Lateran provisions, has a square flag, has vastly more influence than size warrants;

8] Has the Trucial Coast, 7 states from 9, cooperated with the U.S., sandy and barren, Abu Musa Island in dispute, British stadium;

9] Mainly mestizo, five thousand died in “the football war”, constantly invaded, bigger than Tennessee, disputed territory called "bolsones";

10] Tea producer, tsunami in 2004, ethnic violence and rebel movement, no international disputes, Galle is one harbour.

Answers here.