Friday, May 01, 2009

[vortigern] lovely chap who invited us here


Appropriate day to post this. The Celtic site continues:

Vortigern was a warlord in Britain during the 5th century A.D. By all accounts, Vortigern appeared to be a usurper and a pretender to the rule of Britain and was shown to be a man of low character and inclinations. He achieved his position through assassination and treachery, killing even the young king, Constans, to whom he was an advisor.

Constans' baby brother, Uther, was unknown to Vortigern and so escaped his treachery. Vortigern ruled Britain with the aid of Saxon mercenaries who kept him in power until he, too, dealt with them harshly.

The Saxons eventually turned on him and Vortigern met his death in a blazing castle tower in Wales at the hands of Geoffrey of Monmouth, although some sources claim that the tower was mysteriously struck by lightning, catching it on fire.

(Later, when the Tarot decks of the middle ages and renaissance were designed, this imagery became the inspiration behind the card "The Tower". Vortigern is the figure in the foreground plummeting headfirst from the lightning-blasted tower.)

After Geoffrey's rule of Britain, Constans' brother, Uther Pendragon, became ruler of Britain, and Uther Pendragon was the father of the legendary King Arthur.

It all goes to remind us just how pagan and barbaric Britain has actually remained under the surface and how relevant the sacrificial groves [I’m quite near some Welsh ones and often pop down to observe proceedings], Rosslyn, Glastonbury, the Once and Future King et al, are to these dark satanic times. The Wicker Man found his ignorance of the real Bretagne to his cost.

Dark doings might penetrate the night, the Keepers of the Dawn might usher in the Morning Star, for whose delectation the Eastern Star awaits, the sacred feminin may be enshrined elsewhere and the Moriah avenging wind could well be poised to consume all. Kabbalah shabbalah [or whatever manifestation the message takes at the time] maitreya betrayer delayer [as it fails to pan out as planned], whichever image your master currently chooses to utilize, sorry to blunt your daggers, oh robed and hooded ones - the grand vision just ain’t gonna happen, however much you symbolically hang out your Calvist messages for all to see, beneath Blackfriar’s Bridge or splattered over Pillar 13.

The thing is, yawn, there’s the infuriating little Davidian problem of the Cross to overcome first. You might have torn the hearts out of the messengers, Agents Smith but you can never tear the heart out of the message.

8 comments:

  1. "By all accounts...": brilliant! Oh yes, we have so many accounts of early Dark Ages Britain. We can hardly move for the mountains of accounts. Diaries, letters, essays, think-pieces, histories, geographies and diplomatic messages - all, all are abundant.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Britain has an horrendous history and one does not have to go that far back[or ahead] to find it.
    I recall reading a paper from the 18th century where politicians of the day were advocating dealing with the abundance of poor Catholics by eating the children as a delicacy reserved for the wealthy,dressed and cooked similar to a pig.
    The paper went on to show the social benefits such as reduction of Catholics, beggars, violence against [pregnant]women, if men were worried they could lose money if he caused a miscarriage of the child he'd be paid per pound.Earning opportunities for poor Catholic women who'd be encouraged to compete with each other in producing bigger babies for the table.
    It was even cited that women would feel 'useful' in being able to contribute to the family income this way,also gaining respect fromm her husband who would see her as a contributer/wage earner.

    The politician who made the report felt that the best age for the tenderest of meat would be 2-3 yrs of age but maidens up to 12 would also be good[and could double as housemaids prior to their real use,providing they weren't told] which would in turn relieve the fathers of a lifetime burden of upkeep for unmarriagable daughters.
    The indepth report even came with a recipe for dressing the 'meat' for the oven and suggestions of the prime cuts.

    It was an admired report by his colleagues ,but was ultimately rejected,not because it was inhumane,cannibalistic and barbaric ,but because the other politicians anticipated that the wealthy aristocrats would probably not be able to adjust to eating Catholic children as a cheaper alternative to beef,pork and poultry. They guessed that the wealthy would not want to be the first to serve this delicacy unless they could be assured their peers would do so also,making it socially acceptable.

    I think the report was dated 1763.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Sorry James. I had to add ,delete and re-post that comment.

    My blog has not been removed,but I have stopped posting,yes.

    Do you miss me? :)

    ReplyDelete
  4. Dean Jonathan Swift was an exceptional satirist and his "Modest Proposal" of 1729to which ubermouth alludes should be read as a criticism of the laissez-faire attitude to the Irish poor. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/A_Modest_Proposal

    ReplyDelete
  5. Gallimaufry-
    I just read the link you posted.
    It seems that the report I read had been edited for some passages from Wiki were not included ,but had they been the satire and irony would not have been lost on me.
    Thanks for the info . It's a relief to know it was not a genuine proposal.Other links of Swift's satire would be appreciated.

    ReplyDelete
  6. Ubermouth:
    As a fan of Swift's I'm really glad to share him with as many people as possible. Gulliver's Travels is perhaps his best and most famous contemporary satire. Here's the wiki on him:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Jonathan_Swift

    ReplyDelete
  7. Gallimaufry-Thanks! I will read for sure. :)

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.