Sunday, September 02, 2007

[sunday thought] someone has to say it

This is a blog. Blogs must be fun, quick bites of entertaining fiskings of the MSM or pen-pictures of homelife, otherwise readers move on. I'd hoped this post would be fun. Sorry to disappoint:
Major General Tim Cross, the top British officer involved in planning post-war Iraq, said he raised serious concerns with then US defence secretary Donald Rumsfeld about the possibility of the country descending into chaos […]General Sir Mike Jackson branded US post-invasion policy "intellectually bankrupt" and said Rumsfeld was "one of the most responsible for the current situation in Iraq."

My only quibble with Tim Cross and Mike Jackson is not the targets of their ire - Wolfowitz, Rumsfeld, Cheney are very much responsible for much that is wrong - but that I don't think the officers fully see to whom these men, in turn, pay their tithes. It's not excusing the Rumsfelds of this world but they're only pawns in a greater power game and I don't mean the U.S.

There are most definitely trends since the 50s in the west and globally as well and they could be summarized this way:

1. the secularization of society over two generations and replacement of intrinsic values with extrinsic, such as property, fame, sexual gratification and comfort as the be-alls and end-alls, plus goth - always a sign of a disintegrating society and the understandable non-opposition from the Church due to the appointees being of a certain ilk;

2. the progressive appointment of people of this certain ilk, over the last two generations, into positions of power in education, the arts, medicine and law, such people being inimicable to the old values of patriotism and Christianity and by their position, having the ability to snuff out and mock western societies' roots to the point where Gen X and Y have largely grown up as g-dless hedonists;

3. a lot of global talk at ruling elite level in every western nation and from bodies such as the U.N. plus openly global elitist bodies such as the CFR, the TLC, the BBs and the other luminaries all pushing the same agenda;

4. a clear push for war by those behind the weak western leaders - Kosovo, Iraq and NATO operations to name the most recent and the re-emergence of the west in the middle-east generally for the first time since WW2;

5. provocation of Islam in the form of western foreign policy, playing the patriot card against first supposed and then genuine terrorism, to the point where islamization is a very real threat and "terrorism" allows the ruling elite to bring in the legislation they always wanted to in the first place;

6. the weaning of everyone since the 60s onto a credit based economy and therefore serfdom to the banks, the pushing of housing prices to unrealistic levels which cuts out the first home buyer and must inevitably lead to the ultimate crash, the manoeuvring of the credit institutions into a position to be able, by 2012, to pull the plug;

7. the tightening of western society by criminalizing it [e.g. Blair's 3000+ new crimes in his ten years], the dead hand of political correctness now having the power of incarceration for sedition and the talk by Merkel, among others, of the possibility of war now "not able to be ruled out", along with ID cards, iris scans and all the other goodies plus armed police and troops on the streets and the general frightening of society, whether via climate change or terrorism;

8. the shifting of the world hegemony in the form of the emboldened Islamic world plus China [less so Russia] and the spectre of the next conflagration starting locally but escalating to pan-continental, rather than international and possibly centred in the Middle-East.

The essential difficulty is that a small blogger like myself couldn't possibly see what is happening, could he?

Very few will accept the miniscule number of pundits like myself who say that this thing is induced - that there is nothing sociologically natural about the dystopia we are sliding into and thus nothing whatever can halt its advance.

Even if sufficient woke up to who is stirring the pot, inducing the preconditions, it could only be altered by a revolution and this also has been factored in. Revolutions only ever usher in a worse order. So where does that leave you? Into the new serfdom with some of you climbing into relative safety in the new order. For the nonce.

Where does that leave me? As a Christian and one who is trying to do the job the Pope and the silent Archbishops should be doing but who were either bought or frightened into silence, it's pretty bleak.

Sooner or later I'll be rounded up, a loose cannon which will fire no more. So why bother?

Heaven knows. Someone has to say it.


7 comments:

  1. Tim CRos gets one mention page 17 of Paul Bremer's "My Year in Iraq" and that not very flattering - evidently whatever he might have said did not make any difference then.

    It was too late ... it is faily pointless to details as you do the decay of Wetern Civilisation ,with which few might argue that Pat Buchanan in his 2 books "Where the West went Wrong" etc., doesn't do better at greater length and in more detail - although he migh over egg the Roman catholicism.

    The illegal invasion of Iraq prospered because of the collective failure of the military / political leadership - millions marched but were ignored.

    Greta is Truth and it shall prevail is the Latin tag "Magna est veritas.." well it has praevalabit and what a fucking mess we are in.

    ..and General Janus (c all me Mike) Jackson with all his post propter hoc wailing and gashing won't put Humpty together again as he indulges in his belated arse covering exercise.

    Can't fault your analysis old boy ... what do we do ? Shoot 'em or hang 'em ? .. or just flog 'em ?

    ReplyDelete
  2. I differ slightly only on one point:

    ...the collective failure of the military / political leadership...

    On the contrary, with all due respect - they succeeded marvellously. The difference between these people and the Irish Rugby team is that the latter goes onto the field to deliberately cause breakdowns in play and in the resulting mayhem, they score.

    The former sit back and put policies into place which create the preconditions for people like the Irish Rugby team - the Rumsfeld of the world - to go in and cause mayhem.

    Therefore the former are infinitely more clever, more cynical and more to blame. They're almost impossible to pin anything onto except in myriad posts where one small point is made against one person and then he falls by the wayside, e.g. Rumsfeld and the next one takes his place.

    It's a writhing hydra and I don't know how it can be countered. They don't know either and therefore don't worry too much about the likes of me.

    ReplyDelete
  3. I'm entirely with you on this one James. You're so right.

    ReplyDelete
  4. Put like that , and so well written , James, you'll be surprised to know that there is little I could disagree with in what you say here. [Now, don't get touchy - that doesn't mean I don't think everything you write is well crafted - it is!]

    ReplyDelete
  5. Ps: Simi and I will come and rescue you before you are rounded up!

    ReplyDelete
  6. Wouldn't get too close to the Oirish Rugby team ...

    Ex Major General Tim Cross, General Janus Jackson , Major General Patrick Cordingley, ( who led the Desert Rats in the 1991 Gulf War the Mirror reminds us) , Malcolm Rifkind, Menzies Campbell, William Hague, foreign affairs spokesman for the Conservatives .... it is not sufficient to make the argument - it is necessary to win it.

    The British politcial and military leadership signed off, indeed Parliament approved the illegal invasion which millions marched against. They signed up willingly, as brothers in arms with Dubya's gang, they accepted and often promulgated lies. They deceived the public with dossiers - they cannot cast off their responsibilities, conceal their cowardice by now calling the US policies , "intellectually bankrupt" or looking for a handy scapegoat.

    This Post hoc ergo propter hoc fallacy will not wash. The whole illegal military endeavour, the invasion , designed to outflank diplomacy - merely a continuation of a rape that started with sanctions and no-fly zones was a conspiracy.

    It was a conspiracy that the military leaders (however unwilling) failed to modify, it was a compact with a flawed and dishonest leadership - across all parties. Mealy mouthed apologies and casuistic explanations re-directing the blame cannot and must not be allowed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. PS. Methinks the denizens of Camberley, Sandhurst, Downing Street, the FCO, Northwood and HM Embassies take a great deal of care to see what the blogistes are saying than you might imagine.

    Does it knowingly affect policy ? Certainly not but they do chat about these things in the Beefsteak and the Army & Navy (Club not shop).

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.