Thursday, December 14, 2006

[diana verdict] sadly, it’s not the last word

The kindest thing this blog can do is post the nicest picture of her it can find.

The official rejection of conspiracy and murder allegations in connection with the death of Princess Diana almost 10 years ago is unlikely to silence speculation about her tragic death, British analysts said Thursday. Lord Stevens, the former head of Scotland Yard who led the three- year inquiry, admitted, 'I have no doubt that speculation as to what happened that night will continue and that there are some matters, as in many other investigations, about which we may never find a definitive answer. There are even friends of mine who question my findings.'

Of course they are questioned because they fly in the face of simple logic. Have you seen a picture of the approach road to that tunnel? Have you been through that tunnel yourself? What are the chances of crashing right by the 13th pillar? Why so long, via a circuitous route to the hospital? Why were the extraneous personnel in the room in the last moments? It goes on and on, anomaly after anomaly. An exhaustive three year enquiry sounds final, until you see the net result of the verdict – it exonerates the Royal Family and those connected with them.

The Royal Family, to be fair, are on a hiding to nothing here. Found guilty, people would have nodded and said it was logical. Cleared, people point to the anomalies. Sadly, grievously, this thing cannot go away.

5 comments:

  1. It's definitely time to draw a line under this, it was a tragic loss of life, but was clearly caused by a drunken driver, there is no point in further reviews unless new evidence is found.

    ReplyDelete
  2. I'm afraid I find it hard to believe that Prince Phillip is the guy who set this dastardly conspiracy in action. At least it could have been Tony Blair; give Inspector Knacker something else to chat to him about.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Hi, James. Sadly, you are right. It will never go away but nothing will bring her back, will it? This is not the first time the Royal Family have been accused of at least being compliant in bumping off one of their own - I'm not saying they did, just that they've been accused! I think Al Fayed needs counselling. He lost a son and the world's eyes were all on the loss of the Princess.
    By the way, I have had awful trouble with Blogger and pic-loading all day so that's why I haven't been around to comment much. I'll be by tomorrow and I will try to get to grips with the Blogpower thing - it's just I'm scared 'cos it's technical! Buona serata, WL.

    ReplyDelete
  4. I'm with Ellee on this one. Leave the poor woman to rest in peace.

    ReplyDelete
  5. Well, your comments above appear to be fairly unanimous. Will others let it rest though?

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.