First, thanks to the Wail for two pics.
Second, look at how their jackets button ... like a man's, left over right. Yet in the top pic, hard to see but it looks as if it's the trad girl right over left.
Third, I decided not to run an order of pics because ggl takes not a blind bit of notice as a rule when loading ... they can appear in any order. This above was unfortunate because it's their Memorial Day, not ours but I did not wish to go through it all again ... they'd taken much enhancing to get that far!
Fourth, with the US girls, there were so many in their forces not American ... maybe they're loyal to the US, who knows ... I became briefly entangled with one of these not long ago, as Toodles knows. Toodles, by the way, is not just American, she's a dyed-in-the-wool Southerner ... I've seen her in antebelum massive dress.
Fifth, with the Brit gals, they were mainly of our stock (including all home countries in this) but there were multiple issues all the same.
(i) One pic was a Wail photo of some girl passing "the men's physical test" and as such, can now "command" eight men. She can get knotted, I'm not obeying some girl in the field ... fine her commanding eight girls, not an issue. Moreover, she should not be anywhere near the men's units (see Fred Reed). And yes, I accept it's an issue for the men, not the girls ... but it's still an issue lowering efficiency and morale. It's Woke bollox. So I didn't run that ohoto.
(ii) I did run the one of the medical corps girl ... that's absolutely where the gals should be. Look, nothing against combat girls' units as stand alones ... could be useful ... but nowhere near the men. And the other was the girls insisting on long hair down and femininity ... absolutely, girls, 100% support for your stance.