Thursday, February 02, 2023

Thursday [12]

The karens have been at it again. To these wrongdoers, I can only say: "Father forgive them for they know not what they do ..."

One at OoL:

Your post titled "Of both NHS issues plus online reporting" was flagged to us for review. We have determined that it violates our guidelines and deleted the post, previously at:

And one at N.O.:


Along with this bollox:

We encourage you to review the full content of your blog posts to make sure they are in line with our standards as additional violations could result in termination of your blog.

As we do nothing but comply, at either site, with the community guideline demand that we tell only the truth and as we do not mislead in any way, to a fault, obviously any demand of us to do the opposite, i.e. not to tell the truth and to throw in our lot with Wokery is not worthy of response.

In practical terms, anyone using these services might need to look at available alternatives and have something in place. Also, anyone who saw things at our blogs worthy of keeping, you'd best get archiving now.

To readers and patrons, apologies for these sad people but we knew this might happen.

N.O. itself

As regulars know, there is NOWP, plus Jstack. If the worst came to the worst, NOWP would continue in its current role, no change, but Jstack would become the main blog. (Obviously I'd need to revamp to an extent.)  The Jstack url would then be the one to put in your sidebars or address books, were you so inclined.

My other email address would then become my main email for all correspondence:

jimbohigham@protonmaildotcom

A word about Jstack ... when it demands you enter your email, ignore it if you wish or press No Thanks and it will still take you there. Commenting I'm not sure of yet at Jstack ... the process ... I still have to work out how to let our regulars do that incognito.

5 comments:

  1. Steve

    James, in your opinion what triggered them?

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. JH: Some Woke a*s*h*l* complained of course. Doesn't like truth.

      Delete
  2. A bit of gematria a=1 z=26.

    If a chemicocktail company starting with 16 then 6 with 9 and 26 and a couple of other letters is mentioned in the same context as 16roject 22eritas then the likelihood is it will be flagged by the PR teams at the chemicocktail manufacturers and gargoyles will descend.



    ReplyDelete
  3. The removed post was from Jan 22. If they don't tell you what in particular violated their TOS then how can you prevent it happening again? Are we just to post pictures of puppies and recipes?

    ReplyDelete
  4. JH: In one. I'm just preparing systems now. Shall resume posts early evening here.

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.