1. Covid
a. Failure to isolate cv19
b. Development of a 'vaccine' which is not so, it is insertion of foreign bodies
c. Rolling lockdowns which do not kill the virus [see 'a'] so they roll on
d. Enforcement of jabbing by tying it to job tenure
e. The ongoing experimental nature from which pollies are mandating despite known reactions
2. Subset of the above in the Australian, particularly the Victorian and Melbourne situations
3. The American election fraud, in particular in certain key states, along with clear lies as shown below as one fraction of the total picture.
We can't address every single issue all at the same time and though broad brush strokes are valid conclusions in the context of the whole picture we have had since March 2020, that in itself can cloud the reality, particularly when the other side is making bold assertions.
Narrowing it to issue 3 above, it includes suchlike as handcount matching machine count when that is not the issue in the least - the issue was fraudulent ballots, inc. duplicates, internet activity, dumped ballots and the most significant issue of all - that on that night of November 3rd and into November 4th, the DemRat run states suddenly stopped counting at a point where Trump's votes were significantly ahead in those key states, yet next day, a massive reversal of that ocurred without any of those officials halting the count and finding out why.
We all saw windows of polling stations covered over by officials and anyone GOP kept at a distance from the count, across the room, which is in no way scrutiny of a ballot. I myself have been a scrutineer many times- we were required to stand, as our party's sole appointed official on that counting table, behind the counters so even there, sleight of hand was possible, though I found none myself. Yet we saw boxes of ballots tampered with after close of play in footage on the net on this election - never in the MSM, never acted on by any examining body.
4. Collusion of the MSM and courts in confirming false conclusions, e.g. in N3.
5. The problem with our own online sources, e.g. GP, Liberty Beacon [I did a post on them] and Daily Expose which has now changed its name - none of that inspires confidence. Yet our Steve keeps sending the same sources and in today's case, they DO raise significant issues, which forces me to clarify for readers that I saw overreach and conclusions not matching assertions with LB which muddy the waters for our side but here it's good - so variable quality.
6. The UK petrol crisis - haven't really got to this one yet, shall be doing.
Here are today's key links:
Sunday 1b, d
I'm adding to that one which has not gone up yet [been posted] though you'll find it in comments:
Scroll down and you'll see her Dawson county deposition as footage in full - it is highly significant regarding the vaccines.
My suggestion is narrow it down first of all to Sun 1b and 1d, as listed above - just look at those two alone and the issue is clearly spelt out. Looking at Sun 1d:
Ben Cotton confirmed that despite earlier claims by Maricopa County officials the Dominion voting machines were in fact connected to the internet. Ben Cotton reminded the audience that the previous audits by EAS in the county did not find any internet history. This was false. It was not accurate. Ben Cotton found significant internet history on the machines.
That's followed by screenshots of instances of internet activity plus other anomalies.
In short, he is showing that an electoral body flat out lied. That alone, before addressing any of the other issues, inc. why the fraudulent ballots themselves were not addressed by the auditors, is 'reasonable doubt'.
But there is this weird, 'holistic' situation in which EVERYBODY connected to pursuing their duty on these matters is either acting unethically or acting overcautiously and citing false report conclusions as reason for inactivity, rather than addressing the fraudulent conclusions.
Confounding it even more is the GS approved commenter over and over putting the same falsehoods under the umbrella of 'free speech', forcing other commenters, over and over, to have to address his clear trollery, instead of GS stepping in to address it.
So that only weakens GS as a source Plus there's an element of not seeing the forest for the trees here in that if we step back and ask - why the hell all this massive opposition to things coming out, inc. flat out lying? Answer - so many have something to lose if it does come out, which is a bigger issue than all of them. Why would they have something to lose if the electoral process was above board? Acceptable to all groups?
The net effect of course is to undermine confidence in the process, innit? And coming back to mandated foreign bodies jabbed into our bodies - there are quite massive effects on employment around the world. So it's not insignificant.
Steve
ReplyDeleteI'll try to be more selective in future James - it's important for the integrity of your mission.
😁
Delete