Tuesday, May 11, 2021

Tuesday [1 to 4]

4.  Distant Relative


Worth a gander - includes letter from retired Foreign Legion Lt.-General Christian Piquemal response on April 30 

Evokes a "pistols at dawn" scene, face slapping and ripping off of epaulettes......

3.  Let's zero in on this one

Steve sends:  Immediate Use of Ivermectin Medicine Globally Can End COVID-19 Pandemic: Scientists 




Looking at this last one, I was wondering how much of the text was visible/retrievable.  As it stood, it looked impressive when the url was clicked on but I wanted to see text.  When I tried to enlarge, it wouldn't - frame stayed the same. When I tried to access the text, this resulted:
Efficacy of Ivermectin in COVID-19This is a provisional file, not the final typeset article2city mayors and regional health ministries within South American countries initiated “ivermectin distribution” campaigns to their citizen populations in the hopes the drug would prove effective. The tight, reproducible, temporally associated decreases in case counts and case fatality rates in each of those regions compared to nearby regions without such campaigns, suggest that ivermectin may prove to be a global solution to the pandemic. This was further evidenced by the recent incorporation of ivermectin as a prophylaxis and treatment agent for COVID-19 in the national treatment guidelines of Belize, Macedonia, and the state of Uttar Pradesh in Northern India, populated by 210 million people. To our knowledge, the current review is the earliest to compile sufficient clinical data to demonstrate the strong signal of therapeutic efficacy as it is based on numerous clinical trials in multiple disease phases. One limitation is that half the controlled trials have been published in peer-reviewed publications, with the remainder taken from manuscripts uploaded to medicine pre-print servers. Although it is now standard practice for trials data from pre-print servers to immediately influence therapeutic practices during the pandemic, given the controversial therapeutics adopted as a result of this practice, the FLCCC argues that it is imperative that our major national and international health care agencies devote the necessary resources to more quickly validate these studies and confirm the major, positive epidemiological impacts that have been recorded when ivermectin is widely distributed among populations with a high incidence of COVID-19 infections.
Which was fine.  is it injected? One would need to go through the text, look at the end summary.
Conflict of Interest  The authors declare that the research was conducted in the absence of any commercial or financial relationships that could be construed as a potential conflict of interest.
Fine, fine.  Just a raw cut and paste, still with line numbers in it:
In summary, based on the existing and cumulative body of evidence, we recommend the use 612of ivermectin in both prophylaxis and treatment for COVID-19. In the presence of a global COVID-61319 surge, the widespread use of this safe, inexpensive, and effective intervention would lead to a 614drastic reduction in transmission rates and the morbidity and mortality in mild, moderate, and even 615severe disease phases. The authors are encouraged and hopeful at the prospect of the many favorable 616public health and societal impacts that would result once adopted for use
Fine, fine.  Right, well as we know, the govts don't wish to know.  Now, moving back to 'Observer' yesterday, he took us to task for running the ZeroHedge article in our Monday [3]:

3.  Steve

a.  Chinese Military Discussed Weaponizing Covid In 2015 ‘To Cause Enemy’s Medical System To Collapse’ 

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/chinese-military-discussed-weaponizing-covid-in-2015-to-cause-enemys-medical-system-to-collapse/

Now, I had an email about 'Observer' and who he is and that was interesting.  The criticism was, and I'm leaving nothing out, that both sides spin things a bit.  Again, that's fine but the implication was that we were spinning things here, which we do not do, we post a large amount of copy/links.  Obviously, little ole me struggles to get through all of it, plus actually live in RL.  It illustrates, in other words, my limitations and that of N.O.

Yet we're committed to transparency and so I had to mention that I did not approve the comment because of the vague ad hominem and yet I certainly explored the article.  As I wrote yesterday, the main onus was on the ZeroHedge writer to source properly and our tenuous connection which might sever our link to ZH was that we were not employing due diligence. 

Now it matters not whether this is a one man band, which it is is not, or an organisation like the Wail or Guardian - whether there's a chasm of resources and per person time or not, the final result is still printed and were I to complain about us just being a small outfit here or not, Observer knows it does not wash - final copy posted is final copy posted.  he knows it and I know that he knows I know.

That's our dilemma. I could ask Steve to be very careful with the sources but it might slash the sources.  We could say that the veracity is unknown but that undercuts our 'trusted source' status.  One of us might point out that readers have their own brains.  Ours might but many out there on the other side might not and might be 'led astray by NO'.  It's a stretch but I needed to show you the scenario.  We are the media now in the sphere.

The way I go about it is taking care of what needs in RL and also in the main copy here, then later go back and look through the material.  In the case of the ZH thing, it had been sourced, it led to the newspaper you see there and I state again that it is a leftwing source.  Just as with our guardian, it's quite iffy in many ways due to Woke-ocity.

That's about all I want to say on that for now, only to exhort ours to be careful.  Responsibility wise, it's mine because I've asked you to use any moniker you want, meaning you cannot be traced.  Therefore, the baby ends up in my arms or whatever that expression is.

As for Google, they've played fair and methinks they see that I am too.  I do check sources - it takes a short while but it is done.

2.  Steve

a.  Maricopa County, story continues: Elections Witness Jan Bryant Joins Steve Bannon to Talk About Maricopa County Election - “They sent everyone home then rebooted the system on Election Day”


b.  More on Jan: Maricopa County Elections Witness Testifies that Dominion Ran Entire Election – County Officials and Observers never had Access or Passwords! 


c.  Referred to earlier today on N.O. but this is the crux of the matter in the suit filed in the Supreme Court of Arizona by We the People of the State of Arizona: 12. Valid, ratified, contractual relationship between contractor labs (VSTLs) and EAC (Electoral Assistance Commission) have not existed since 2016 and possibly earlier. The EAC sets forth its standards and rules to be abided by in its manual for ESTLs. 

d.  Related: Steve Bannon: "There's Work Going on 24-7 - It's All Gonna Come Out" 


e.  Antrim County update: Now a Second Forensic Audit is Being Requested, As Fate of Election Lawsuit in Michigan Hangs in Balance 


And finally: Wayne Root: Here’s How You Know Democrats Rigged and Stole 2020 Election 


[Root?  Wasn't he a French pornographer?]

f.  Have to see how it goes Expert testimony available from this bloke: Another Interview with Dr Mike Yeadon – “Please warn everyone not to go near top-up vaccines”
 

1.  Snippets

a.  Methinks Lockdown Sceptics' Toby Young protesteth too much, too late, defends the wrong people - meaning the people themselves.  The people, I'm afraid, are idiots, or rather do nothing to understand that the MSM do not provide news, just indoctrination.

Yet that very thing allows me for one to continue for now.  It does seem a game where all the escape hatches are being closed and the options shut down one by one.


When will he or others wake up that this lot called the Tories are just as bad as the rest, only they have a veneer of respectability?  They speak in the sort of voice I do because they had a decent education.  The Uniparty is still going to screw us either way.

b.  FDA authorises Pfizer for 12-15 year olds.  This is now obscene.

c.  Hmmm, Breitbart has nothing but 'catch up late Delingpole.  Need to expand our sources again.  Some dropped from the blogrolls for leftism or globalism might at least give cursory directions to explore.  Losing Twitter turned out a blow but that's life.

2 comments:

  1. Ann Barnhardt - 'Ivermectin discovery and backstory – definitely for the “Just Too Cool” file…'

    https://www.barnhardt.biz/2021/05/10/ivermectin-discovery-and-backstory-definitely-for-the-just-too-cool-file/

    ReplyDelete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.