It’s time the Woke CofE disbanded itself

It’s certainly no longer fit for purpose [says a blogger Christened CofE when a biddy baby].   Voila:

That above was how I scheduled it yesterday but then I looked through it and noticed something which came up with another clip I saw:

I'll address the second first.  The one on our right is Brittany Pettibone at that point in 2017 and her positions are known-knowns - she's the least necessary to explain, IMHO.

The really interesting thing for me and the reason methought this could be a quite incendiary discussion was the co-host, one Tara McCarthy on our left there.  Very soft voice, nice sounding but I saw some YT clips with leftists going apoplectic, almost frothing at the mouth about her 'racism'.  And I saw the uncompromising Tara too.

Now that's very interesting because, as she explains, she's one eighth native indian, redskin if you like.  Grandmother was half indian.  All right, so way back when, her grandmother was the result of her great-grandpappy having it away with a squaw.  

Now that's no big deal in my book in 2021 at least, and it sounds not unlike Pocahontas 1/1024 Warren over there.  Warren was regarded by both sides, I think, as hardly red indian with that fraction in her.

Seems to me that if we're going to start getting into this 1/1024th versus 1/8, where does it all end?  What fraction constitutes 'purebred?  3/4?  7/8?

Where this was always going to heat up was having Lana Lokteth there, who appears to me to be Scandinavian, though the media claims Russian marrying a Swede.  The media further claims she denies the North American decimation of red indians - so her conversation with Tara McC was always going to be interesting.

And immediately she opened by calling mixed race mulatto [which was the right name for it decades ago], which sent Tara McC quiet, then explaining her fractions.  

Now, whatever the rights or wrongs there, the discussion itself just seemed stoooopid to me when it touched on that, rather than what we're supposedly meant to be on about - the invasion and replacement by masses of those not even partly from these isles, as a matter of govt policy from the Windrush days onwards I suppose. 

Easy to blame govt but methinks, in this case, in these isles, that's the situation.  And I am not accepting any blame whatever, myself, for slavery - I never enslaved anyone, maybe a heart or two for a short time, just as you did.  

It seemed to me that the talk between those three gals was becoming sidetracked from both the govt policy, plus behaviour of so many within various ethnicities. It may have been the case that the French became difficult in Louisiana way back when but who hears of French riots today?  German riots?  Dutch?

Yet look at Ferguson and Baltimore.  And over here - Brixton and Toxteth, before we get onto all the grooming, rapes, paedo-ing and so on of a certain cult which controls our govt, let alone the bombings and other murders.  

I also feel it's naive to expect, say, housewives within those ethnicities to bring into line their young men who are the ones mainly doing the damage.  Can they withhold nooky to bring the men in line?  Hardly, under their laws.

To summarise, seems a quite sticky wicket once we start on the fractions and percentages of ethnicity.  Seems to me that the behaviour of various ethnicities is the issue.  Because certain 'communities' do have form this way, no two ways about it.  Plus those exact communities rapidly increase in numbers [had to avoid the term 'breed' there].

All right, leaving that and going back to the first video - the two chappies started going through Welby's various cases of racism in support of his argument.  

That's a minefield.  An elderly cleric makes reference to those from 'the Indian subcontinent', their inability to be understood [anyone have BT in their home and has ever tried phoning BT?], plus their penchant for theft.  I have nothing to say about the theft bit - just don't know.

Now look at this cleric's situation - lives among the pleasant hills of God's Own Country north of Londinium, has all his life.  Huge numbers start appearing of an ethnicity which is anything but Yorkshire - I mean even a Brummy would be detected among those hills, certainly a plum-in-the-mouth RP speaker.

The approach of the Church was to send him on 'unconscious bias' training.  In Britain or England or whatever you want to call it [Midlands?], what are you going to say to a Brummy who tells a Black Country boy to 'go home'?  It's a nightmare to sort out.  Somerset versus Dorset?  Fulham versus Chelsea?

Those are, to us, fine differences, which is not the case with half of Africa being shipped over here onto already crowded islands and far from assimilating [behaviour], they have a collective chip on the shoulder about slavery and feel it's quite ok to smash shop windows and loot. Or else the other lot try to set up their own courts and take the land over as their own. Why aren't they all sent for 'unconscious bias' training?

And eventually, when it becomes not just alien but alien and hostile groups, then there is a genuine problem. 

And once again, it's not that any other ethnicity at all is an issue  - I have no beef with an American settling next door, nor an Italian - it's that certain ethnicities or cults do have many innocents among them, do have many subconsciously biased, and then a percentage out-and-out hostile.  It's the imported chip on the shoulder which is an issue, those importing their own issues, like Californians flooding Texas.

Speaking of those things, what about the Italians in New York and surrounds?  

And anywhere you let Italians, Greeks or Russians in - there is the mafia.  

And where working class English are - there are the Krays and Bricktops.  What does one do?

Coming back to the CofE - first go to Chapter 4 in Saturday 12 yesterday and note the Pope making the eye of horus - Welby is any different?  Look at the overall departure from scripture in so many ways.  

But even if I agree with you that 'organised' religion is a minefield - when you dispossess the Churches of their property, their loot, where does that dosh actually go? Into whose pockets?  

To govt coffers or to pay administrators?  Does it go to cookery classes in India or China?  Does it go to Climate Change Consciousness training?  Dance classes for Zimbabweans?

This post is over?

Not a bit of it - I just watched further along with the three gals in the second YT, past the 12 minute mark and Lana made a lot of sense, so did the other two.  But every time, the focus kept returning to purpose in the land, agenda, behaviour - this is THE central issue.  Plus total numbers as percentage of the population.

Seriously, who's going to moan about an influx of Swiss until they get above the 7-8% mark?  Everyone starts to notice large numbers of cuckoo clocks appearing in shop windows.  How about 7-8% of the population being yardies Jamaicans?  Huge increase in Rocksteady and Ska?  Or huge increase in crime?  Gang warfare?  Which?

And possibly the last point - the women are the engine room of a culture - they it is who keep things in their hearts and impart them to their children and children's children on a daily basis. if your women are insane, having five year olds undergo surgery and puberty blockers later, aborting full term or second half term babies, then there's mass ethnic and cultural suicide right there.  What our women think is quite crucial for that reason.

And look at the Woke nutter women today, esp. among Millennials and post-Millennials. Hook up culture.  Huge issue but not one I feel most readers have high on their list of issues.