Tuesday, April 20, 2021

Keeping one eye on China and Russia

For want of a full ferreting on my part or checking again the offerings of our boys and girls, may I just include this for now - you'll know where it's from:

  • Russian troops are massing on the Ukraine border, Chinese vessels are swarming Whitsun Reef of the Philippines in the South China Sea, and China's air force is flying almost daily through Taiwan's air-defense identification zone. Chinese troops for almost a year have been dug in deep in Indian-controlled Ladakh in the Himalayas. Two large aggressors are threatening to break apart neighbors and absorb them.

  • American attempts to de-escalate flashpoints are seen in Russian and Chinese circles as failures of resolve.

  • The Global Times, an unofficial Communist Party tabloid used by Beijing to signal new policies, on April 12 posted a video of Hu Xijin, its editor-in-chief, warning that Beijing would overfly Taiwan—in other words, fly into Taiwan's sovereign airspace—to "declare sovereignty."

  • Chinese leaders speak provocatively because, among other reasons, they do not believe the United States or others will come to Taiwan's rescue.... In effect, China's leaders are saying they do not believe President Joe Biden would defend Taiwan.

  • In a propaganda blast on April 8, China's regime said Taiwan "won't stand a chance" if it decides to invade the island. This Chinese self-perception of overwhelming strength is extraordinarily dangerous....


  • [W]e have already passed the point where just declarations and warnings will suffice. The Biden administration has yet to impose costs on China for aggressive actions jeopardizing America's security and that of allies like Japan. Chinese leaders, while hearing the mild warnings from the Biden administration, must be asking one question: "Or what?"

  • Vladimir Putin in 2019 said that Russia reserved the right to protect ethnic Russians outside Russia. This month, Dmitry Kozak, deputy head of Russia's presidential administration, said his country might intervene to "defend" its citizens. If it did, he suggested, Ukraine would not survive because it would not be "a shot in the leg, but in the face."

  • The American response has not been adequate. Russians perceive Biden as feeble. "In Putin's game of brinkmanship, Biden blinked first," said journalist Konstantin Eggert to the BBC, referring to the American president proposing a meeting to his Russian counterpart. Biden's "nerves," he said, "had failed him."

  • That assessment may be correct. In the face of threats directed at Washington by Russian Deputy Foreign Minister Sergei Ryabkov, the U.S. Navy did not, as many had expected, send two destroyers through the Bosporus into the international waters of the Black Sea. Politico reported that "two U.S. officials familiar with the plans" said the cancellation was due to American concerns about inflaming the Russia-Ukraine situation....

  • The ultimate decision to stay away made it look as if the U.S. had backed down.

  • The Dragon and the Bear appear to be coordinating moves, as they have for some time. At the very least, each is acting with an eye to what the other is doing. Once one of these aggressors makes a move, the other large state, taking advantage of the situation, will almost certainly follow. Biden also has to be concerned about Moscow or Beijing acting through proxies Iran and North Korea.

  • All the elements for history's next great conflict are now in place.

As and when I go through the comments section of our blog, digging out China/Russia references, this post must do for now.

9 comments:

  1. Steve

    Daily Caller, tweet of the year?

    '"I will give you that Congresswoman Waters may have given you something on appeal that may result in this whole trial being overturned," says Judge Peter Cahill to Derek Chauvin's lawyer Eric Nelson.'

    https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1384253844226412550

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. @Steve - from the judge's statement in your comment, it looks to me like he already knows that Chauvin will be convicted. After all, you can't appeal unless you have been convicted. Its all beginning to look a bit fake IMO.

      Delete
    2. Steve

      Just heard that Biden's butted in now, calling Floyd a "good man". So, $17 million dollars later we reach peak mistrial with the President of the United States giving his tuppence worth to the jury.

      Delete
    3. Steve

      The Mayor of Minneapolis, Jacob Frey, yesterday:

      “Regardless of the decision made by the jury, there is one true reality, which is that George Floyd was killed at the hands of police."

      https://twitter.com/DailyCaller/status/1384321662921871361

      Delete
  2. Seems that way to me too, which gets us no for’arder.

    ReplyDelete
  3. Given the connections which were made and discussed extensively on NOUK last year re Chauvin and Floyd there has to be some way of getting Chauvin off the hook hence Mad Maxine opening her cake hole. I am reminded of this http://mileswmathis.com/oj.pdf

    ReplyDelete
  4. Verdict reached. TBA 3.30 - 4 p.m. local time.
    https://www.nbcnews.com/news/us-news/derek-chauvin-verdict-reached-trial-over-george-floyd-s-death-n1264565

    ReplyDelete
    Replies
    1. "MINNEAPOLIS — Derek Chauvin has been convicted of second- and third-degree murder, as well as second-degree manslaughter for his involvement in George Floyd’s death. He faces up to 75 years in prison.The jury read the decision Tuesday, the day after deliberations began.

      Second-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 40 years. Third-degree murder carries a maximum sentence of 25 years. Second-degree manslaughter is punishable by up to 10 years.

      The third-degree murder charge had initially been dismissed, but it was reinstated after an appeals court ruling in an unrelated case established new grounds for it days before jury selection started."

      Well there ya go....

      Delete

Comments need a moniker of your choosing before or after ... no moniker, not posted, sorry.