Monday too

6.  Check these two screenshots out

In the first, the sane person is Greg Price:

In the second, the sane person is Merissa:

In both cases, we need to examine the loon - Ygle or Rico - and certain things they say or write, as has been commented on constantly by the sane side of politics - certain things they say or write are so diametrically the opposite of the truth that one seriously wonders what's going on in Ygle's or Rico's brain.

a]  Certain things are in the grey area, e.g. 'socialism is good', and if we point out Russia or China, we're told by these people that those are National Socialism, not real socialism where everyone loves one another. To justify that, they ask us is it wrong to love one another.

Truth there is that they are going to hold that high moral ground no matter what, and all realities are going to be fitted to that imperative - the imperative that they are the good guys, no matter what we can show them, e.g. Antifa/BLM bashing in shopfronts.

And they keep it at that level in perpetuity, not remotely interested in actuality.

b]  Actuality is seen in the second. Merissa says audits are healthy.  I'd say it depends who does the audit - for example, if Maricopa County audits itself, if Sturgeon pronounces judgment that she's innocence upon herself - but as a general rule, yes, audits and checks are healthy for an organisation, provided all parties agree ahead of time on whom and on their scope.  for example, we would not agree on the current Electoral Commission in the least - it is like a BBC panel in composition.

But at least we are able to point to those things.

c]  To the premise that 'Biden is good', it's so easy to show he's not, before even getting to the fraud.  He is quite unfit for the office of POTUS - starting with the Ukraine.  With Roberts and SCOTUS, it just needs the flight manifest to paedo island.

Yet Ygle, Rico and our current troll here are utterly convinced that their 'opinion' is equally as valid.  Which is bizarre when it can be demonstrated that it is not.  A case in point is Salmond.  Sturgeon prevents him from presenting evidence, then claims he presented nothing.

Similar in Arizona - you can't prevent evidence being shown, decide this is admissible or that not, then come out at the end and say checks have been carried out, hearings have been heard.  No they bloody well have not and in any properly constituted system, there would be a series of appeals to some body not aligned with the alleged perps.

I know I'm not writing anything here we don't already know but seeing it up front in this emboldened way - it's quite a shock for someone whose whole career depended on insisting on evenhandedness and at least the right to be heard.

The really sad aspect of it all is that it is impossible to deal with, argue with, debate with, discuss with any of these leftists and/or RINOs/CINOs because we're nowhere near the same page to begin with.  Furthermore, it is dismaying and exhausting, precisely the effect they wish to achieve. Sadly, if they're going to act like this, then they want all out war and I for one am happy to give it to them.

5.  Distant Relative brings it