Monday, September 07, 2009

[identity] when blogs become news centres

Most of us run blogs in our own idiosyncratic way. Some of us try to make them one man magazines, others invite people to contribute but in the end - they're still blogs, with one principal writer whom the reader is expecting to see more often than not.

Some which spring to mind are The Devil's Kitchen and Capitalists at Work, perhaps Bryan Appleyard.

Of these three, I'd say the only one which manages to be a group blog in its truest sense is CaW. The other two have many contributors, as do I but people tend to go there for the particular style of that blogger and that blog. Anything else is a bonus.

I've always thought that when a blogger tries to get something going at his blog, he's pushing it uphill and it usually ends up with him being the major contributor, even if one prepares a techie site and mailing list to go with it.

One site which does break the shackles and is an alternative to the MSM is the First Post, which presents as a newspaper and the only thing which makes it "bloggy" are the opinion pieces, of which there are many.

In no doubt about its identity is one of the originals - Samizdata - firmly in the blog camp, with many contributors who are subordinate to the management as far as editorial control goes. Samizdata keeps on keeping on - I'm not sure if it makes money.

One I haven't seen for years is Harry's Place, which used to be ruled with a rod of iron by its manager or so the folk lore went - who knows what happens today? Like Samizdata, that's as close as one is going to get to a public blog.

The Economic Voice is, in its layout, more newspaper than blog but it is presented as a forum for your views. A great idea but it has stiff competition from so many other pundits around the sphere. TEV would decry the word competition and opt for consensus, no doubt. However, I can think of Politeia and Gates of Vienna immediately as blogs gathering their own memberships as well.

EU Referendum is half and half, as far as I can see - a blog come news service on the EU issue and the most consistent voice on the issue.

Steve Green had an interesting thing going - one half of his site was a referendum on a daily basis but two things ended that, again as far as I can see - the sheer upkeep of such a blog and the wish of the readers to treat it as a Tory blog, so that is what it became.


Group blogging projects need a good deal of planning and selling and a generous slice of luck. The chance of one or two contributors dominating them is always high unless the proprietor is clearly in charge. In the case of nourishing obscurity, it doesn't attempt to be anything but a one person blog but does try to shake it up a bit with guest posts and a variety of subject matter.

Will the group blogs or group projects ultimately outlast the single blogger? One would think the chances are that they would although some bloggers seem to keep on keeping on. Group blogs though never rest, never cease to publish, never have hiatuses. If they're well run, they will always be a port of call for those on the net.

[late evening listening] majune and moby

Project by Daniel Winterhoff - Majune:



Moby - from 18:



So far, we have had Dearieme [ongoing], Ubermouth, Cherry Pie and HGF featuring their selections here.

I'd like to open it up a bit by asking if you have a favourite youtube piece of music that can be run here. Just send link or name of the piece to:

nourishingobscurity@gmail.com

I'll also start the ball rolling by tagging a few people, say Xlbrl, Tiberius Gracchus and North Northwester, to provide theirs. If they're reading this - go to it, lads.

[useless knowledge] is your mind cluttered


1. In Shakespeare's time, mattresses were secured on bed frames by ropes. When you pulled on the ropes the mattress tightened, making the bed firmer and.generally more comfortable to sleep on. That's where the phrase, "?" came from.

2. The sentence "The quick brown fox jumps over the lazy dog" uses every letter in the English alphabet, as you know. What you might not know is that it was developed by whom to test telex/fax communications?

3. The only 15 letter word that can be spelled without repeating a letter is .....? Hint - what we hope all the pictures on blogs are.

4. The Main Library at Indiana University sinks over an inch every year because when it was built, engineers failed to take into account ..... what?

5. The phrase "?" comes from an old English law which stated that you couldn’t beat your wife with anything wider than your thumb.

Answers


Goodnight, sleep tight; Western Union; uncopyrightable; the weight of all the books that would occupy the building; rule of thumb

[sherlock again] who was the killer


Sherlock Holmes received an urgent telegram from a client who felt certain that his life was in danger. Holmes and Watson hurried to his lodgings only to find that they were too late. The man had been murdered minutes before they had arrived.

"I found him lying there," said the landlady. "Before he died, he muttered something about belonging to a secret club and quoted the number 92."

"Damned strange thing to say, Holmes," said Watson. Holmes nodded in agreement. "Did he say anything else?" Holmes asked the landlady.

"I asked him who had done this terrible thing to him, but he just repeated the number 92!" she answered.

Holmes thanked her for her help and discharged her. He then proceeded to search the dead man's room, coming across a letter addressed to the man from the other three members of the secret club.

Their names were Wilson, Updike and Brown. In the top left of the letter was the name of the dead man, Smith (Code 69).

From this, Holmes deduced that he had been murdered by another member of the club, and that the number that he had uttered to the landlady was in fact the code number of the murderer.

Holmes then supplied the name of the killer.

Which of the three was the killer?

Wilson

[match tricks three] try before you check

These 6 matches form 2 triangles.

Rearrange them to form 4 triangles.


Check your solution here.

Try these as well:

Matchtricks 1
Matchtricks 2

[michael ignatieff] and the politics of duress

The question is - to buy into Canadian politics or not? Your humble blogger bought into American politics, he bought into Brit politics so if we're treading on thin ice, we might as well dance ...



Let me repeat, from the youtube: "We might even have to engage in some forms of targetted assassination." [Michael Ignatieff]

Hey, way to go, Mick. Do you still want to force an election?

No doubt about it, Canada has changed from what I remember, so much so that some people might still think it's a utopia.

[file sharing] when is it legal


This is more of a request for information. The Age is currently running this, about an Australian survey:

More than 62 per cent of respondents bought music from a digital store in the past year, while 72 per cent bought a CD. Other studies have shown that people who download music illegally are far more likely to pay for songs than those who don't.

This contradicts claims by the music industry that it loses hundreds of millions of dollars a year to file sharing. These claims are usually based on the assumption that every illegally downloaded track is a lost sale. The British Government came out with figures claiming 7 million Britons were illegal file sharers, but this was revealed by the BBC this week to be an extrapolation from responses of just 136 people.

I'm not sure what illegal file sharing is and that's not being facetious or telling porkies. If my friend bought a CD, say, in Zambeseland and loaded it to his computer, could he legally send me one track from the CD he bought? If that is illegal, given that he bought the CD in the first place, then why is it illegal?

In Russia, one never knew. You'd go along to one of the emporia, as a paying customer and buy a CD for 70 roubles [about $3]. As far as you knew, it was legal. The issue was with the vendor. What's the situation in the west?

Personally, I've never done it as it was not necessary in Russia with the cheap CDs and DVDs and over here, ASDA sell titles for £3-7 if you're prepared to wait. At those prices [I picked up a complete set of Morse for £10], it's not an issue.

And yet there's the occasional track I'd like to have. For example, I was looking at Nils Lofgren's appropriately titled It's Not a Crime. The album's not bad overall and if I saw it in a music store [unlikely], then I'd pay up to £5 for it but no more. It only costs 99c on the web but there's the problem - I don't use cards. Therefore, the only way might be for someone to send it to me.

What's the current state of play with this game?

[downsizing] swingeing cuts in hard times

[labor day] current state of play in the u.s.a.


I'm not even sure I should run this, on America's situation this Labor Day:

Official unemployment hovers just under 10 percent, its highest level since the early 1980s. Add in the partly employed and those who have given up on hunting for jobs because there are so few jobs to be had, and the unemployed and underemployed total 16.8 percent of the labor force -- one out of six American workers.

The problems facing workers predate, and are more profound than, the recession, as three important surveys released last week show. Young workers are unemployed in record numbers -- 25 percent of teenagers, or about 1.6 million, are without work, the highest since 1948, when tracking data by age began.

But the lot of employed workers under age 35 is dismal, too, as a survey conducted by Peter Hart Research for the AFL-CIO makes clear. Thirty-one percent are uninsured -- up from 24 percent a decade ago. Just 31 percent say that they make enough money to put some aside, down from 52 percent in 1999.

With private-sector unionization at a mere 8 percent, and with Chinese competition dragging down wages and benefits across the United States, the living standards of non-professional young Americans are spiraling lower.

Things don't look any better for older workers. The Pew Research Center found that nearly two out of five Americans over 62 who are still working say that they've delayed their retirement because of the recession, and a stunning 63 percent of workers ages 50 to 61 say that they might have to push back their retirement dates because of economic conditions.

Those conditions reflect not just the recession but also the massive shift away from defined-benefit pensions to the 401(k) plans that employers have imposed over the past few decades. Even before the recession, it was clear that Americans reliant on 401(k)s hadn't saved nearly enough to guarantee a secure retirement, and many of those who thought they'd put aside enough saw their savings plunge dramatically with the stock market in the past two years.

What America doesn't have is heavy loss of productivity over a long period, as in the UK. It has recent problems with this. However, it has Obama and even though he's not getting his own way in Washington, he is doing things which are quite puzzling to observers.

[tories for 2010] cameron does not impress the less committed


Everybody will probably be blogging on the issue of the North South divide, covered in the Telegraph today.

All this blog has said about the paucity of party politics in the UK is not relevant in the short term, for the simple reason that the paradigm is hardly likely to shift before the next general election. Most pundits say the real changes will start after that.

Meanwhile:

This blog has consistently held, for example here but take your pick of posts, that David Cameron is a liability for the Tories and as a Tory in the north, I am quite concerned.

I'm not sure what they think further south - maybe the clearer air up here helps but I can tell you that all Tories I speak with are concerned and that is not through any leading question from me. My question is usually, "Will the Tories win?" or "What do you think of David Cameron?"

The feeling is that he is a Blair clone, adjusting his policies to suit the changing political climate and whatever will gain votes. Now, we all know that all politicans do that but this is so blatant that it gets noticed. The Telegraph says [no doubt you've already read it]:

A geographical divide also showed that Labour still polled better in the North, with only 33 per cent of voters backing the Tories compared with 35 per cent backing Labour. With few Tory gains expected in Scotland and only marginally more in Wales, Mr Cameron needs to improve his standing outside the South to secure a majority that would enable the Conservatives to govern comfortably.

So far, in the middle of what is perceived up here as the Nu-Labour debacle, those who might have voted Tory [small parties don't have a great standing this far north] feel, as the Telegraph says:

While the headline figures still showed a comfortable Tory lead of 13 points over Labour, the poll, carried out for The Daily Telegraph, disclosed uncertainty among voters over the party’s policies. Nearly two thirds of those questioned were unconvinced about whether there was substance behind Mr Cameron’s words. More than half agreed that it was hard to know what the Tories stood for at the moment.

Rhetoric and making punches land at the despatch box at PMQs may be important in better economic times, when Westminster is not reeling from scandal and self-aggrandizement issues but in the current climate, it cuts very little ice. While David Cameron plays the Westminster game to the hilt, to the delight of the Westminster debate lovers in the south, it means precious little to those on the brink of job loss or who have lost pensions.

What these people want is rock solid, clear policies, outlined one-two-three-four and no ambiguity please. Instead, what they seem to be getting is generalizations like, "Brown's responsible for the mess, which we'll clean up." We know Brown is the one at fault, we don't need to be told that. We do need to be told, in terms of costed proposals, precisely what Cameron intends to do about this situation.

As for traditional Labour voters, many will still vote Labour, considering that they're voting for the "old" Labour. This feeling has been heightened by the rumours that Brown will be replaced shortly before the general election and if a leader acceptable to Old Labour gets in, Cameron will have his work cut out.

Adding to this is the UKIP and LPUK, both who have the capacity to hit hard in the south. I do not consider, as David Cameron himself has pointed out, that this next general election is by any means in the bag.

What should Tory voters and bloggers do?


For a start, it's all very well calling me, for example, a traitor to the Tories but I am still a voter and the Tories need all our votes. Many are disgruntled with the leader and others are papering up the cracks and calling for loyalty, calling for support for a leader who just doesn't cut it. A leader is never going to be 100% supported and I agree that once the party makes a decision, then there needs to be a time during which he can expect loyalty.

However, if the choice was SO wrong that the chances of a Tory victory are diminished substantially or if he has failed to impress over a long period of time, then something must be done and done quickly. Remember, it is not the party faithful or the dyed-in-the-wool voter who is important here. It is the swinging voter, the semi-Tory who's thinking out his position who is critical.

And I'm telling you that this sort of voter is not happy with a government led by David Cameron.

There will come a time when bloggers like me will have to shut up, for loyalty's sake - probably New Year's Eve. But for now, this issue which won't go away will need to be addressed by the Tories and addressed quickly.

Sunday, September 06, 2009

Prisoners and the media (Part 2)

Prisoners and the media (Part 2)

Should the prison authorities punish prisoners who blog?

Or, is banning prisoner bloggers just denying society access to information?

Iain Dale linked to Ben's Blog in his Daley Dozen yesterday. He is fast becoming an internet sensation, cutting through the bull issued by the authorities.

Personally, I prefer to be told as it is than given a false picture. If the public are misled only the public suffers.

[late evening listening] dearieme presents schumann



Kinderszenen [1838] and in particular, Träumerei, reflects on Schumann's love for Clara Wieck but was actually, as he wrote in a letter to her, a reflection of her comment that he sometimes seemed to her as a child.

The real life story was more than interesting. Clara, his piano instructor's daughter, put on a concert, aged 13, which Schumann attended and apparently his mother said to Clara, "You must marry my Robert one day."

Prophetic words.

In 1834, aged 24, he became engaged to Ernestine von Fricken, 16 but Clara made a reappearance at 15, he fell in love, Ernestine was found to be illegitimate, hence no dowry and so he and Clara declared their love. Papa was having none of that though and put a stop to it.

In 1836, it had not really ended with Clara but there was a legal battle between the father and Schumann, resolved when she turned of age in 1840; they married on September 12th [anniversary next Saturday] and that was that for the rest of his life.

[blogging on valium] across the sphere

Having just done the rounds of my blogrolls, I left the main roll till last and so reached Mark Wadsworth who had this:

This is my first post since 8.32 Friday morning. It seems like weeks. Maybe I'm addicted or something.

That just confirms to me something I've noticed for a few days - very few are blogging. Of those who are, some seem to be going through the motions but there are precious few who are really going for it in the way regular bloggers do. Some were writing curt little posts.

Not only that, not all that many were visiting. When people drop off visiting me, my first reaction is, "Oh dear, what have I done to offend now?" My second reaction is, "Oh dear, perhaps I should be visiting more."

This is what I have now done and can say that very few seem to be visiting anyone.

Now, this might be down to the last warm weather of summer, the last chance to have time away. It might be down to the American Labor Day weekend and our bank holiday sort of continuing on into the next weekend. It could be all these things.

Too early to say it's anything to do with the blogosphere as a whole although I've been reading some stories about this.

[today's mindbender] what was the present?


Sherlock Holmes had received two telegrams from the infamous Professor Moriarty within a space of 3 hours.

The first was a threat against the famous detective's life, while the second said that he, the professor, had organized a present for Holmes. Moriarty told Holmes what he'd organized, in the form of the following riddle:
He who makes it, makes it to sell,
He who buys it, does not see it,

He who uses it, does not know it.
Watson read the riddle. "It doesn't make sense to me, Holmes. First he threatens your life and then he organizes a present for you."

"Solve the riddle, Watson, then you'll see that it makes sense," replied Holmes.

What was Moriarty sending Holmes?

A coffin

[name the partner] or the more famous colleague

Each of the people below has a partner who is or was very well known, even if the person in the picture is well known him/herself. In one case, it's not a partner but a work colleague who is the famous one.

The task is to identify the other person not in the pic below.

1. A Japanese/American film producer:


2. A politician:


3. A violinist and mandolin player:


4. Lewisham boy:


5. Betty Joan Perske:


Answers

Daniel Craig, Ségolène Royal, Rod Stewart, Margaret Thatcher, Humphrey Bogart

[g20] their boners and the pittsburgh ordnance trained on them


You may need my translation of this piece in Spiegel about the G20 in London:

Finanzminister-Treffen in London

G20 scheitern mit schneller Boni-Lösung

Deutschland und Frankreich haben sich nicht durchsetzen können - beim Treffen der G-20-Finanzminister wurde die Entscheidung über eine Obergrenze für Banker-Boni verschoben. Damit ist klar: Das Thema kommt beim Gipfel in Pittsburgh erneut auf die Tagesordnung.

The translation:

Finance Minister Triffids in London The G20 sh-ts with fast-rising boners are losers. Dammit - it's clear, the theme from Pittsburgh involves daily ordnance to be fired at them.

Hope that's clear. Alles klar?

[louis thomas mcfadden] eccentric or right on the money? [part one]

Using my mate’s model, everything is on a sliding scale – everything from sexual preference to social behaviour and so we have degrees of eccentricity within us.

You might say you don’t but I bet if I came over your way and stayed beside you for a week, I’d see certain habits and modes of thought a little out of the “ordinary”, whatever that means.

Whereas it seems quite appropriate to apply certain political labels – left liberal and socialist as reflecting one set of thoughts and beliefs and conservative as another set, despite protestations to the contrary from one side of politics [if the cap fits – wear it], nevertheless there is a sliding scale in operation and it’s uneven – a person can be downright peculiar in one aspect but orthodox in most others.

George Bernard Shaw said, in Man and Superman [1903]:

The reasonable man adapts to the world: the unreasonable one persists in trying to adapt the world to himself. Therefore all progress depends on the unreasonable man.

You’re not going to get any stunning revelations or inventions from the chap who takes the train in the morning, comes home in the evening, sups, sleeps and takes the train in the morning, not unless a brainwave strikes him, as Saul was struck on the road to Damascus.

Ditto with eccentricity.

The reason such a man [or woman] gets the revelation and someone else doesn’t is that he was either looking for it or wandering down strange byways and pathways where the likelihood of something popping up were multiplied.

Now he has his first problem.

“Eureka, I have found it!” he runs into the street naked and cries and people politely look away or sidestep him. Why? Because he is the elephant in the roadway and he is just an inconvenience to all others who wish to go about their business.

Not for them the disruption of their routines, not for them to be late for their appointments.

Thus he is roundly ignored or if he has some reputation for clear thinking and more often having it right, he’ll get a polite hearing and then they’ll turn back to each other and say, “Anyway, have you seen the price on gold today? Well …”

Louis McFadden

Was there ever a name to make a third of the people automatically turn away and guffaw or raise the eyes to the ceiling, a third to not have the least clue who he is/was and the other third to see him as a champion of the common man and the essence of what true conservatism is.

Was there ever a name to have so trespassed on the preserve of those who run America as to have necessitated his assassination?

He had it a bit skewed in some ways, in that using the word England and Britain disparagingly, he was not having a go at the ordinary Brit but at the money men at the top who buy and sell our land for their profit and for our financial enslavement.

Yet in having a go at Britain, so many misunderstood.

He was not careful that when he accused "the Jews"; he was referring to the Rothschilds and the hidden finance, not to Jews in general, a distinction Hitler was to blur at that very time, by blaming the ordinary Jew for the ills which the Jewish bankers had perpetrated, along with the gentile bankers.

The man was first and foremost a patriot and those who attempted to slur him were the Moneymen in the counting houses, the MIC and those who operate in a different world to you and me. What I see in his congressional record is a man with his country and its constitution very much at heart and for that, as well as for speaking out on behalf of all Americans, there should be a statue to him someone in a prominent place, just as there should be to Andrew Jackson, the last president who, except in a lesser way with Lincoln, Kennedy and Ike, pursued that type of Americanism which the Founding Fathers had written of though they pursued it to varying degrees, in practice.

Mini-bio

As former bank president and treasurer of the Pennsylvania Bankers’ Association, he even looks the epitome of the cautious banker and one does not become such unless one is conservative in outlook.

He served as Chairman of the United States House Committee on Banking and Currency during the Sixty-sixth through Seventy-first Congresses. He was responsible for the McFadden Act, which specifically prohibited interstate branching, by allowing national banks to branch only within the state in which it is situated.

When this conservative congressman suddenly launched out with his “the United States has to choose between God and the money changers who have unlawfully taken our gold and lawful money into their possession", he was on a hiding to nothing.

The essential problem McFadden posed the Bankers was that, as a well respected money man – you don’t get to head the USHCBC if you’re a madman – he couldn’t just be ignored or marginalized although history has done that to him in subsequent decades. He’s now written out of the U.S. history books, he’s never mentioned in schools, except, in passing, as a man who claimed the Fed was corrupt and then the statement is itself just passed over.

What never gets a hearing is that he quoted chapter and verse, carried out congressional interviews of different personages, all on the record; he named names, as well as the substance of what these people were guilty of.

Outside of Congress, he would, of course, have been sued into oblivion.

His former buddies saw him as a liability they did not know how to handle, he was not re-elected – that was seen to by the powers-that-be and as a “former” congressman, the opponents he attacked called him a man with no authority to back his statements, one best forgotten and let’s all move on.

The trouble was, America swallowed this and did move on, as someone in a trance, spellbound by the Finance as they’d always been.

When a great majority elect someone like Obama, in the face of mounting evidence and a scandal even before he assumes office, when the American people re-elect Nixon in a landslide, even after Watergate has broken and suspicions have been syndicated round the world, to the extent that I heard of it and asked my elders and betters why America would re-elect a crook, then there is something deeply wrong in the American polity.

McFadden fell victim to this, as the cynical Them knew he ultimately must. There was hardly any need to attempt his life twice before he finally succumbed to a “heart attack”.

Perhaps the stress of having lost everything, his reputation, his position as congressman, his livelihood, his former friends in the banking world, living, as he was, under the constant threat of being taken out for the damage he had potentially caused, damage which might have led to the complete restructuring of the U.S. economy, with ramifications across the world, not least in Britain itself – given all that, he might well have had that heart attack.

Either way, he was a dead man walking and why? Because he told the truth. That was all. Because he told the truth.

Oh my goodness – why are such men vilified, spat on and marginalized before being crucified on crosses? Why are such men not honoured for their courage and for promoting what is surely the very thing they should be promoting?

McFadden would be horrified at my comaprison in the last paragraph and of course the two are not equivalent in any shape or form but there are some mighty cogent similarities as to how they went about things. In my book, One was too good for this world and the other should be deeply respected and his story taught to every American schoolchild.

What I admire the most is that he stood alone, whereas even Jesus had disciples.

What caused the furore?

Wiki:

On June 10, 1932, McFadden made a 25-minute speech before the House of Representatives, in which he accused the Federal Reserve of deliberately causing the Great Depression. McFadden also claimed that Wall Street bankers funded the Bolshevik Revolution through the Federal Reserve banks and the European central banks with which it cooperated.

In the same speech McFadden expressed dismay at the fact that over $13 million in gold had been shipped to a rebuilding Germany that year by the Federal Reserve. He also explained how Nelson Aldrich was tutored by European bankers, then later submitted the Aldrich bill, a translation of the statutes of the Reichsbank and other European central banks, which became the Federal Reserve Act after a half-million-dollar public information program.

Bloody hell – how would that go down?

His crime was that he hadn’t laid the foundations in the weeks and months before; he saw this as a rare opportunity in a large forum to get his point across and he utilized it. Unfortunately, the human brain cannot accept such a radical change to the paradigm in one day and the reaction ranged from shocked silence, through angry denunciation to mocking and the applying of epithets as too many are wont to do.

He made the speech at a highly volatile time during the Depression, when subseuqent events showed that the Evil Ones were gearing up for WWII and thus spin was in full ... well ... spin.

Wiki continues:

As part of his attempts to root out corruption in the Federal Reserve McFadden moved to impeach President Herbert Hoover in 1932, and also introduced a resolution bringing conspiracy charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve. The impeachment resolution was defeated by a vote of 361 to 8; it was seen as a big vote of confidence to President Hoover from the House.

In 1933, he introduced House Resolution No. 158, articles of impeachment for the Secretary of the Treasury, two assistant Secretaries of the Treasury, the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve, and the officers and directors of its twelve regional banks.

The Reaction

Of course he was to go down in a heap. Of course there was no other way. These were not only powerful forces he’d taken on – they were the very forces which run the whole show in the U.S. and overseas and they must have seen him as just a fly to swat, though a pesky and annoying fly, for a' that.

Resorting to the “let’s back our President at this time of national crisis, let’s support our country and our constitution”, the latter being the very thing McFadden was doing, they had him marginalized and the hostility of the sheep turned against him. The forces of destruction of the United States had triumphed again.

An article I’ve long since lost the link for put it this way:

The dean of Washington newspapermen at that time and founder of the National Press Club, Mr. George Stimpson, when asked in later years to comment on the seriousness and magnitude of the charges being made by McFadden, replied, "It was incredible. This town went into a state of shock. We couldn't believe what we were hearing. Of course, they said right away that he had lost his mind."

"Do you think he had?", Stimpson was asked.

"Oh, no," came the reply, "but it was too much, too much for one man to do".

He made these speeches knowing that there was no support; that there would be no support. Was it too quixotic of him? Should he have waited, quietly gathering his information until it could have been put to more practical use?

And why was there no support? We must remember that when McFadden made these speeches we were in the darkest days of the Great Depression, when the nation was prostrate and in the dark night of the soul of the American people. A sad and defeated nation, destroyed from within, brought to its knees, could offer no help when McFadden opened every door and named every name.

The Civil War, World War I, the Great Depression, World War II... these were events which were not desired by the American people. They were not planned by the American people. They were not voluntarily entered into by the American people. But all of these events were the result of the planning of men who have no addresses, no fixed homes, no substantial loyalties save only to their own interests.

Louis T. McFadden was alone. He had nothing to look forward to save his own political demise. The power of his enemies was brought to bear and his political life was terminated in the November 1934 elections held in the 15th Congressional District of Pennsylvania.

Now, all that was left was his killing. From Gold Eagle:

Congressman Louis McFadden died a mysterious death in 1936. The only reference I could find of it comes from the excessively right wing rag of the time, Pelley’s Weekly, that stated on Oct. 14th:

“Now that this sterling American patriot has made the Passing, it became known among his intimates that he had suffered two attacks against his life. The first attack came in the form of two revolver shots fired at him from ambush as he was alighting from a cab in front of one of the Capital hotels. Fortunately both shots missed him, the bullets burying themselves in the structure of the cab.

He became violently ill after partaking of food at a political banquet at Washington. His life was only saved from what was subsequently announced as a poisoning by the presence of a physician friend at the banquet, who at once procured a stomach pump and subjected the Congressman to emergency treatment."

There’ve been other references since then which confirm the substance of this but of course, put the death down to natural causes. He was 60 years old at his death.

[louis thomas mcfadden] eccentric or right on the money? [part two]



On May 23, 1933, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden, brought formal charges against the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts.

Extracts from the speech

From the Floor of the House of Representatives by the Honorable Louis T. McFadden of Pennsylvania, Chairman of the Banking and Currency Committee:

"Mr. Chairman, we have in this Country one of the most corrupt institutions the world has ever known. I refer to the Federal Reserve Board and the Federal Reserve Banks, hereinafter called the Fed. The Fed has cheated the Government of these United States and the people of the United States out of enough money to pay the Nation's debt. The depredations and iniquities of the Fed have cost enough money to pay the National debt several times over.

"This evil institution has impoverished and ruined the people of these United States, has bankrupted itself, and has practically bankrupted our Government. It has done this through the defects of the law under which it operates, through the maladministration of that law by the Fed and through the corrupt practices of the moneyed vultures who control it.

"Some people who think that the Federal Reserve Banks are United States Government institutions. They are private monopolies which prey upon the people of these United States for the benefit of themselves and their foreign customers.

"These twelve private credit monopolies were deceitfully and disloyally foisted upon this Country by the bankers who came here from Europe and repaid us our hospitality by undermining our American institutions. Those bankers took money out of this Country to finance Japan in a war against Russia. They created a reign of terror in Russia with our money in order to help that war along. They instigated the separate peace between Germany and Russia, and thus drove a wedge between the allies in World War.

They financed Trotsky's passage from New York to Russia so that he might assist in the destruction of the Russian Empire. They fomented and instigated the Russian Revolution, and placed a large fund of American dollars at Trotsky's disposal in one of their branch banks in Sweden so that through him Russian homes might be thoroughly broken up and Russian children flung far and wide from their natural protectors. They have since begun breaking up of American homes and the dispersal of American children.

"Mr. Chairman, there should be no partisanship in matters concerning banking and currency affairs in this Country, and I do not speak with any.

"In 1912 the National Monetary Association, under the chairmanship of the late Senator Nelson W. Aldrich, made a report and presented a vicious bill called the National Reserve Association bill.

This bill is usually spoken of as the Aldrich bill. Senator Aldrich did not write the Aldrich bill. He was the tool, if not the accomplice, of the European bankers who for nearly twenty years had been scheming to set up a central bank in this Country and who in 1912 has spent and were continuing to spend vast sums of money to accomplish their purpose.

"We were opposed to the Aldrich plan for a central bank. The men who rule the Democratic Party then promised the people that if they were returned to power there would be no central bank established here while they held the reigns of government. Thirteen months later that promise was broken, and the Wilson administration, under the tutelage of those sinister Wall Street figures who stood behind Colonel House, established here in our free Country the worm-eaten monarchical institution of the "King's Bank" to control us from the top downward, and from the cradle to the grave.

"The Federal Reserve Bank destroyed our old and characteristic way of doing business. It discriminated against our 1-name commercial paper, the finest in the world, and it set up the antiquated 2-name paper, which is the present curse of this Country and which wrecked every country which has ever given it scope; it fastened down upon the Country the very tyranny from which the framers of the Constitution sought to save us.

"One of the greatest battles for the preservation of this Republic was fought out here in Jackson's time; when the second Bank of the United States, founded on the same false principles of those which are here exemplified in the Fed was hurled out of existence. After that, in 1837, the Country was warned against the dangers that might ensue if the predatory interests, after being cast out should come back in disguise and unite themselves to the Executive and through him, acquire control of the Government.

"The draughtsman who was employed to write the text of the Aldrich bill [wrote], in general, a translation of the statues of the Reichsbank and other European central banks. One-half million dollars was spent … for the purpose of misleading public opinion and giving Congress the impression that there was an overwhelming popular demand for it and for the asset currency based on human debts and obligations.

"A few days before the bill came to a vote, Senator Henry Cabot Lodge, of Massachusetts, wrote to Senator John W. Weeks as follows:

New York City,
December 17, 1913

"'My Dear Senator Weeks:

"'Throughout my public life I have supported all measures designed to take the Government out of the banking business. This bill puts the Government into the banking business as never before in our history. "'The powers vested in the Federal Reserve Board seen to me highly dangerous especially where there is political control of the Board. I should be sorry to hold stock in a bank subject to such dominations.

The bill as it stands seems to me to open the way to a vast inflation of the currency. "'I had hoped to support this bill, but I cannot vote for it cause it seems to me to contain features and to rest upon principles in the highest degree menacing to our prosperity, to stability in business, and to the general welfare of the people of the United States.

Very Truly Yours,
Henry Cabot Lodge.'"

"In eighteen years that have passed since Senator Lodge wrote that letter of warning all of his predictions have come true. The Government is in the banking business as never before … Through the Fed the riffraff of every country is operating on the public credit of the United States Government.

"Meanwhile and on account of it, we ourselves are in the midst of the greatest depression we have ever known.

"In 1913, before the Senate Banking and Currency Committee, Mr. Alexander Lassen made the following statement:

"The whole scheme of the Fed with its commercial paper (an impractical, cumbersome machinery) is simply a cover to secure the privilege of issuing money, and to evade payment of as much tax upon circulation as possible and then control the issue and maintain, instead of reducing interest rates. It will prove to the advantage of the few and the detriment of the people. It will mean continued shortage of actual money and further extension of credits, for when there is a shortage of money people have to borrow to their cost.'

"A few days before the Fed passed, Senator Root denounced the Fed as an outrage on our liberties. He predicted:

'Long before we wake up from our dream of prosperity through an inflated currency, our gold- which alone could have kept us from catastrophe- will have vanished and no rate of interest will tempt it to return.'

"If ever a prophecy came true, that one did.

"The Fed became law the day before Christmas Eve, in the year 1913, and shortly afterwards, the German International bankers, Kuhn, Loeb and Co. sent one of their partners here to run it.

"The Fed Note is essentially unsound. It is the worst currency and the most dangerous that this Country has ever known. When the proponents of the act saw that the Democratic doctrine would not permit them to let the proposed banks issue the new currency as bank notes, they should have stopped at that.

They should not have foisted that kind of asset currency on the United States Government. They should not have made the Government [liable on the private] debts of individuals and corporations, and, least of all, on the private debts of foreigners.

"As Kemerer says:

'The Fed Notes, therefore, in form, have some of the qualities of Government paper money, but in substance, are almost a pure asset currency possessing a Government guarantee against which contingency the Government has made no provision whatever.'

"Hon. L.J.Hill, a former member of the House, said:

"They are obligations of the Government for which the United States received nothing and for the payment of which at any time, it assumes the responsibility: looking to the Fed to recoup itself.'

"Before the Banking and Currency Committee, when the bill was under discussion Mr. Crozier of Cincinnati said:

'The imperial power of elasticity of the public currency is wielded exclusively by the central corporations owned by the banks. This is a life and death power over all local banks and all business. It can be used to create or destroy prosperity, to ward off or cause stringencies and panics.

By making money artificially scarce, interest rates throughout the Country can be arbitrarily raised and the bank tax on all business and cost of living increased for the profit of the banks owning these regional central banks, and without the slightest benefit to the people. The 12 Corporations together cover and monopolize and use for private gain every dollar of the public currency and all public revenue of the United States.

Not a dollar can be put into circulation among the people by their Government, without the consent of and on terms fixed by these 12 private money trusts.'

"In defiance of this and all other warnings, the proponents of the Fed created the 12 private credit corporations and gave them an absolute monopoly of the currency of these United States- not of the Fed Notes alone- but of all other currency! The Fed Act providing ways and means by which the gold and general currency in the hands of the American people could be obtained by the Fed in exchange for Fed Notes- which are not money- but mere promises to pay.

"Mr. Chairman, if a Scottish distiller wishes to send a cargo of Scotch whiskey to these United States, he can draw his bill against the purchasing bootlegger in dollars and after the bootlegger has accepted it by writing his name across the face of it, the Scotch distiller can send that bill to the … open discount market in New York City where the Fed will buy it and use it as collateral for a new issue of Fed Notes.

Thus the Government of these United States pay the Scotch distiller for the whiskey before it is shipped, and if it is lost on the way, or if the Coast Guard seizes it and destroys it, the Fed simply write off the loss and the government never recovers the money that was paid to the Scotch distiller.

"While we are attempting to enforce prohibition here, the Fed are in the distillery business in Europe and paying bootlegger bills with public credit of these United States.

"Mr. Chairman, by the same process, they compel our Government to pay the German brewer for his beer. Why should the Fed be permitted to finance the brewing industry in Germany either in this way or as they do, by compelling small and fearful United States Banks to take stock in the Isenbeck Brewery and in the German Bank for brewing industries?

"Mr. Chairman, if Dynamit Nobel of Germany, wishes to sell dynamite in Japan to use in Manchuria or elsewhere, it can draw its bill against the Japanese customers in dollars and send that bill to the … open discount market in New York City where the Fed will buy it and use it as collateral for a new issue of Fed Notes- while at the same time the Fed will be helping Dynamit Nobel by stuffing its stock into the United States banking system.

"Why should we send our representatives to the disarmament conference at Geneva- while the Fed is making our Government pay Japanese debts to German Munitions makers?

"Mr. Chairman, if a German wishes to raise a crop of beans and sell them to a Japanese customer, he can draw a bill against his prospective Japanese customer in dollars and have it purchased by the Fed and get the money out of this Country at the expense of the American people before he has even planted the beans in the ground.

"Mr. Chairman, why should the currency of these United States be issued on the strength of German Beer? Why should these United States be compelled to issue many billions of dollars every year to pay the debts of one foreigner to another foreigner?

"Was it for this that our National Bank depositors had their money taken out of our banks and shipped abroad? Was it for this that they had to lose it?

Why should the public credit of these United States and likewise money belonging to our National Bank depositors be used to support foreign brewers, narcotic drug vendors, whiskey distillers, wig makers and Chilean bean growers, to finance the munition factories of Germany and Soviet Russia?

"The United States has been ransacked and pillaged …Our markets were swamped with unneeded and unwanted imported goods priced far above their value and made to equal the dollar volume of our honest exports, and to kill or reduce our favorable balance of trade.

As Agents of the foreign central banks the Fed try by every means in their power to reduce our favorable balance of trade. They act for the foreign principal and they accept fees from foreigners for acting against the best interests of these United States. Naturally there has been great competition among foreigners for the favors of the Fed.

"What we need to do is to send the reserves of our National Banks home to the people who earned and produced them and who still own them and to the banks which were compelled to surrender them to predatory interests.

"Mr. Chairman, there is nothing like the Fed pool of confiscated bank deposits in the world. It is a public trough of American wealth in which the foreigners claim rights, equal to or greater than Americans. The Fed are the agents of the foreign central banks. They barter the public credit of the United States Government and hire it our to foreigners at a profit to themselves.

"All this is done at the expense of the United States Government, and at a sickening loss to the American people. Only our great wealth enabled us to stand the drain of it as long as we did.

"We need to destroy the Fed, wherein our national reserves are impounded for the benefit of the foreigners.

"We need to save America for Americans.

"Mr. Chairman, when you hold a $10 Fed Note in your hand, you are holding a piece of paper which sooner or later is going to cost the United States Government $10 in gold (unless the Government is obliged to go off the gold standard). It is based on limburger cheese in foreign warehouses or in cans purported to contain peas or horse meat, illicit drugs, rags and bones from Soviet Russia, wines whiskey, natural gas, goat and dog fur, garlic on the string, and Bombay ducks.

"If you like to have paper money- which is secured by such commodities- you have it in Fed Note. If you desire to obtain the thing of value upon which this paper currency is based, that is, the limburger cheese, the whiskey, the illicit drugs, or any of the other staples- you will have a very hard time finding them.

"Many of these worshipful commodities are in foreign Countries. Are you going to Germany to inspect her warehouses to see if the specified things of value are there? I do not think that you would find them there if you did go.

"On April 27, 1932, the Fed outfit sent $750,000 belonging to American bank depositors in gold to Germany. A week later another $300,000 in gold was shipped to Germany. About the middle of May $12,000,000 in gold was shipped to Germany by the Fed. Almost every week there is a shipment of gold to Germany. These shipments are not made for profit on the exchange since the German marks are blow parity with the dollar.

"Mr. Chairman, I believe that the National Bank depositors of these United States have a right to know what the Fed are doing with their money. There are millions of National Bank depositors in the Country who do not know that a percentage of every dollar they deposit in a Member Bank of the Fed goes automatically to American Agents of the foreign banks and that all their deposits can be paid away to foreigners without their knowledge or consent by the questionable practices of the Fed.

"The Fed have been International Banks from the beginning, with these United States as their enforced banker and supplier of currency. But it is none the less extraordinary to see these twelve private credit monopolies buying the debts of foreigners against foreigners, in all parts of the world and asking the Government of these United States for new issues of Fed notes in exchange for them.

"The magnitude of the acceptance racket as it has been developed by the Fed, their foreign correspondents, and the predatory European born bankers: Fed Notes are taken from the U.S. Government in unlimited quantities. It is strange that the burden of supplying these immense sums of money to the gambling fraternity has at last proved too heavy for the American people to endure. Would it not be a national [calamity to] again bind down this burden on the backs of the American people and by means of a long rawhide whip of the credit masters, compel them to enter another seventeen years of slavery? They are trying to do that now.

"Mr. Speaker, on the 13th of January of this year I addressed the House on the subject of the Reconstruction Finance Corporation. In the course of my remarks I made the following statement: In 1928 the member banks of the Fed borrowed $60,598,690,000 from the Fed on their fifteen-day promissory notes.

Think of it. Sixty billion dollars payable on demand in gold in the course of one single year. The actual amount of such obligations called for six times as much monetary gold as there is in the world. Such transactions represent a grant in the course of one single year of about $7,000,000 to every member of the Fed.

"Is it any wonder that American labor which ultimately pays the cost of all banking operations of this Country has at last proved unequal to the task of supplying this huge total of cash and credit for the benefit of the stock market manipulators and foreign swindlers?

"In 1933 the Fed presented the staggering amount of $60,598,690,000 to its member banks at the expense of the wage earners and tax payers of these United States. In 1929, the year of the stock market crash, the Fed advanced $58,000,000,000 to member banks.

"In 1930 while the speculating banks were getting out of the stock market at the expense of the general public, the Fed advanced them $13,022,782,000. This shows that when the banks were gambling on the public credit of these United States as represented by the Fed currency, they were subsidized to any amount they required by the Fed. When the swindle began to fall, the bankers knew it in advance and withdrew from the market. They got out with whole skins- and left the people of these United States to pay the piper.

"My friend from Kansas, Mr. McGugin, has stated that he thought the Fed lent money on rediscounting. So they do, but they lend comparatively little that way. The real discounting that they do has been called a mere penny in the slot business. It is too slow for genuine high flyers. They discourage it.

They prefer to subsidize their favorite banks by making them $60,000,000,000 advances and they prefer to acquire assistance in the notorious open discount market in New York, where they can use it to control the price of stocks and bonds on the exchanges.

"For every dollar they advanced on discounts in 1928, they lent $33.00 to their favorite banks for whom they do a business of several billion dollars income tax on their profits to these United States.

"This is the John Law swindle over again. The theft of Teapot Dome was trifling compared to it. What King ever robbed his subject to such an extent as the Fed has robbed us?

" Sharpers with a strong banking "fence" on this side of the water, act as receiver of a worthless paper coming from abroad, endorsing it and getting the currency out of the Fed as quickly as possible, exchanging that currency for gold and in turn transmitting the gold to its foreign confederates.

"Such were the exploits of Ivar Krueger, Mr. Hoover's friend. That is what happens when a Country forsakes its Constitution and gives its sovereignty over the public currency to private interests. Give them the flag and they will sell it.

"The nature of Kreuger's organized swindle and the bankrupt condition of Kreuger's combine was known here last June when Hoover sought to exempt Krueger's loan to Germany of $125,000,000 from the operation of the Hoover Moratorium. The bankrupt condition of Krueger's swindle was known here last summer when $30,000,000 was taken from the American taxpayers by certain bankers in New York for the ostensible purpose of permitting Krueger to make a loan to Colombia.

Colombia never saw that money.

"The nature of Krueger's swindle was known here in January when he visited his friend, Mr. Hoover, at the White House. It was known here in March before he went to Paris and committed suicide.

"Mr. Chairman, I think the people of the United States are entitled to know how many billions of dollars were placed at the disposal of Krueger and his gigantic combine by the Fed, and to know how much of our Government currency was issued and lost in the financing of that great swindle in the years during which the Fed took care of Krueger's requirements.

"A few days ago, the President of the United States with a white face and shaking hands, went before the Senate of behalf of the moneyed interests and asked the Senate to levy a tax on the people so that foreigners might know that these United States would pay its debt to them.

"Most Americans thought it was the other way around. What does these United States owe foreigners? When and by whom was the debt incurred? It was incurred by the Fed, when they peddled the signature of the Government to foreigners for a price. It is what the United States Government has to pay to redeem the obligations of the Fed.

"Are you going to let these thieves get off scot free? Is there one law for the looter who drives up to the door of the United States Treasury in his limousine and another for the United States Veterans who are sleeping on the floor of a dilapidated house on the outskirts of Washington?

"It will take twenty years to redeem our Government. Twenty years of penal servitude to pay off the gambling debts of the traitorous Fed and to vast flood of American wages and savings, bank deposits, and the United States Government credit which the Fed exported out of this country to their foreign principals.

"The Fed lately conducted an anti-hoarding campaign here. They took that extra money which they had persuaded the American people to put into the banks - they sent it to Europe - along with the rest. In the last several months, they have sent $1,300,000,000 in gold to their foreign employers and every dollar of that gold belonged to the people of these United States and was unlawfully taken from them.

"Mr. Chairman, within the limits of the time allowed me, I cannot enter into a particularized discussion of the Fed. I have singled out the Fed currency for a few remarks because there has lately been some talk here of "fiat money". What kind of money is being pumped into the open discount market and through it into foreign channels and stock exchanges?

Mr. Mills of the Treasury has spoken here of his horror of the printing presses and his horror of dishonest money. He has no horror of dishonest money. If he had, he would be no party to the present gambling of the Fed in the … open discount market of New York, a market in which the sellers are represented by 10 discount corporations owned and organized by the very banks which own and control the Fed.

"Fiat money, indeed!

"What Mr. Mills is fighting for is the preservation, whole and entire, of the banker's monopoly of all the currency of the United States Government.

"Mr. Chairman, last December, I introduced a resolution here asking for an examination and an audit of the Fed and all related matters. If the House sees fit to make such an investigation, the people of these United States will obtain information of great value. This is a Government of the people, by the people, for the people. Consequently, nothing should be concealed from the people. The man who deceives the people is a traitor to these United States.

"Every effort has been made by the Fed to conceal its powers- but the truth is- the Fed has usurped the Government. It controls everything here and it controls all of our foreign relations. It makes and breaks governments at will.

"Mr. Chairman, when the Fed was passed, the people of these United States did not perceive that a world system was being set up here which would make the savings of the American school teacher available to a narcotic-drug vendor in Acapulco.

They did not perceive that these United States was to be lowered to the position of a coolie country which has nothing but raw material and heart, that Russia was destined to supply the man power and that this country was to supply the financial power to an "international super-state, controlled by international bankers and international industrialists acting together to enslave the world for their own pleasure.

"The people of these United States are being greatly wronged. They have been driven from their employments. They have been dispossessed from their homes. They have been evicted from their rented quarters. They have lost their children. They have been left to suffer and die for lack of shelter, food, clothing and medicine.

"The wealth of these United States and the working capital have been taken away from them and has either been locked in the vaults of certain banks and the great corporations or exported to foreign countries for the benefit of the foreign customers of these banks and corporations. So far as the people of the United States are concerned, the cupboard is bare.

"It is true that the warehouses and coal yards and grain elevators are full, but these are padlocked, and the great banks and corporations hold the keys.

"Mr. Chairman, a serious situation confronts the House of Representatives today. We are trustees of the people and the rights of the people are being taken away from them … Common decency requires us to examine the public accounts of the Government and see what crimes against the public welfare have been committed.

"What is needed here is a return to the Constitution of these United States.

"The old struggle that was fought out here in Jackson's time must be fought our over again. The independent United States Treasury should be reestablished and the Government should keep its own money under lock and key in the building the people provided for that purpose.

"Asset currency should be done away with. The Fed should be abolished and the State boundaries should be respected. Bank reserves should be kept within the boundaries of the States whose people own them, and this reserve money of the people should be protected so that the International Bankers and acceptance bankers and discount dealers cannot draw it away from them.

"The Fed should be repealed, and the Fed Banks, having violated their charters, should be liquidated immediately. Faithless Government officials who have violated their oaths of office should be impeached and brought to trial.

"Mr. Chairman, the United States has been bankrupted by the corrupt and dishonest Fed. It has repudiated its debts to its own citizens. Its chief foreign creditor is Great Britain, and a British bailiff has been at the White House and the British Agents are in the United States Treasury making an inventory, arranging terms of liquidation [of U.S. assets].

"Mr. Chairman, by means of [this], Great Britain has become the financial mistress of the world. She has regained the position she occupied before the World War.

"For several years she has been a silent partner in the business of the Fed. Under threat of blackmail, or by their bribery, or by their native treachery to the people of the United States, the officials in charge of the Fed unwisely gave Great Britain immense gold loans running into hundreds of millions of dollars.

They did this against the law! Those gold loans were not single transactions. They gave Great Britain a borrowing power in the United States of billions. She squeezed billions out of this Country by means of her control of the Fed.

"As soon as the Hoover Moratorium was announced, Great Britain moved to consolidate her gains. After the … signing away of American rights at the 7-power conference at London in July, 1931, which put the Fed under the control of the Bank of International Settlements, Great Britain began to tighten the hangman's noose around the neck of the United States.

"She abandoned the gold standard and embarked on a campaign of buying up the claims of foreigners against the Fed in all parts of the world. She has now sent her bailiff, Ramsey MacDonald, here to get her war debt to this country canceled.

"Ramsey MacDonald has come here to compel the President to sign on the dotted line, and that is what Roosevelt is about to do! Roosevelt will endeavor to conceal the nature of his action from the American people. But he will obey the International Bankers and transfer the war debt that Great Britain should pay to the American people, to the shoulders of the American taxpayers.

"There was no national emergency here when Franklin D. Roosevelt took office.

"The week before the bank holiday was declared in New York State, the deposits in the New York savings banks were greater than the withdrawals. There were no runs on New York Banks. There was no need of a bank holiday in New York, or of a national holiday.

"Roosevelt did what the International Bankers ordered him to do!

"Do not deceive yourself, Mr. Chairman, or permit yourself to be deceived by others into the belief that Roosevelt's dictatorship is in any way intended to benefit the people of the United States: he is preparing to sign on the dotted line!

"He is preparing to internationalize this Country and to destroy our Constitution itself in order to keep the Fed intact as a money institution for foreigners.

"Mr. Chairman, I see no reason why citizens of the United States should be terrorized into surrendering their property to the International Bankers who own and control the Fed. The statement that it is necessary for the people to give their gold- the only real money- to the banks in order to protect the currency, is a statement of calculated dishonesty!

"By his unlawful usurpation of power on the night of March 5, 1933, and by his proclamation, which in my opinion was in violation of the Constitution of the United States, Roosevelt divorced the currency of the United States from gold, and the United States currency is no longer protected by gold. It is therefore sheer dishonesty to say that the people's gold is needed to protect the currency.

"Roosevelt ordered the people to give their gold to private interests- that is, to banks.

"By his action in closing the banks of the United States, Roosevelt seized the gold value of forty billions or more of bank deposits in the United States banks. Those deposits were deposits of gold values. By his action he has rendered them payable to the depositors in paper only, if payable at all, and the paper money he proposes to pay out to bank depositors and to the people generally in lieu of their hard earned gold values in itself, and being based on nothing into which the people can convert it the said paper money is of negligible value altogether. It is the money of slaves, not of free men.

"At noon on the 4th of March, 1933, FDR with his hand on the Bible, took an oath to preserve, protect and defend the Constitution of the U.S. At midnight on the 5th of March, 1933, he confiscated the property of American citizens.

"The people of the U.S. are now using unredeemable paper slips for money. The Treasury cannot redeem that paper in gold or silver. And the Administration has since had the effrontery to raid the country for more gold for the private interests by telling our patriotic citizens that their gold is needed to protect the currency.

"It is not being used to protect the currency! It is being used to protect the Fed!

"Has Roosevelt relieved any other class of debtors in this country from the necessity of paying their debts? Has he made a proclamation telling the farmers that they need not pay their mortgages? Has he made a proclamation to the effect that mothers of starving children need not pay their milk bills? Has he made a proclamation relieving householders from the necessity of paying rent?

"Not he!

He has issued one kind of proclamation only, and that is a proclamation to relieve international bankers and the foreign debtors of the United States Government.

"Mr. Chairman, a gold certificate is a warehouse receipt for gold in the Treasury, and the man who has a gold certificate is the actual owner of a corresponding amount of gold stacked in the Treasury subject to his order.

"Now comes Roosevelt, declaring that it may no longer be converted into gold at the will of the holder.

"Next was the reduction in the pay of all Federal employees.

"Next in order are the veterans of all wars, many of whom are aged and infirm, and other sick and disabled, compelled to give up their pensions for the financial benefit of the International vultures who have looted the Treasury and bankrupted the country.

"There are many ways of raising revenue that are better than this barbaric act of injustice.

"Why not collect from the Fed the amount they owe the U.S. Treasury in interest on all the Fed currency they have taken from the Government? That would put billions of dollars into the U.S. Treasury.

"Why not compel the Fed to disclose their profits and to pay the Government its share?

"I do not like to see vivisections performed on human beings. I do not like to see the American people used for experimental purposes by the credit masters of the United States. They predicted among themselves that they would be able to produce a condition here in which American citizens would be completely humbled and left starving and penniless in the streets.

"An American stumbl[es] from hunger when he walks. "Something should be done about it, they say. Five-cent meals, or something!

But FDR will not permit the House of Representatives to investigate the condition of the Fed. FDR will not do that. He has certain International Bankers to serve. They look to him as the man Higher Up who will protect them from the just wrath of an outraged people.

"The International Bankers have always hated our pensioners. A man with a small pension is a ward of the Government. He is not dependent upon them for a salary or wages. They cannot control him. They do not like him. It gave them great pleasure, therefore, to slash the veterans.

"As a prominent Democrat lately remarked to me; "There is no new deal. The same old crowd is in control."

"We know from assertions made here by the Hon. John N. Garner, Vice-President of the U.S. that there is a condition in the [United States such as] would cause American citizens, if they knew what it was, to lose all confidence in their government.

"Roosevelt has brought with him from Wall Street, James Warburg, alien born, son of a former partner of Kuhn, Loeb and Co.

"He holds no office in our Government, but I am told that he is in daily attendance at the Treasury, and that he has private quarters there!

"The text of the Executive order which seems to place an embargo on shipments of gold permits the Secretary of the Treasury to issue licenses at his discretion for the export of gold coin, or bullion [to] a recognized foreign government or foreign central bank for international settlement.

"By the terms of this executive order, gold may be exported if it is actually required, for the fulfillment of any contract entered into prior to the date of the order, namely, April 20, 1933.

"If a European Bank should send 100,000,000 dollars in Fed currency to a bank in this country for redemption, that bank [would] ship gold to Europe in exchange for that currency. Such Fed currency would represent "contracts" entered into prior to the date of the order. "

At this point, Congressman, Louis T. McFadden formally charges each of the Board of Governors of the Federal Reserve Bank system, The Comptroller of the Currency and the Secretary of United States Treasury for numerous criminal acts. After some discussion and upon the motion of Mr. Byrns, the resolution and charge were referred to the Committee on the Judiciary.

[louis thomas mcfadden] eccentric or right on the money? [part three]




The congressional record

Congressman Fiesinger: " I was just going to remark that very thing, that the power to "coin and fix the value of money" is solely within the power of the Congress of the United States and it cannot be delegated to anybody else in the world."

Congressman McFadden: "Will the gentleman yield further?"

Congressman Fiesinger: " I do."

Congressman McFadden: "What does the gentleman say in regard to the delegation of that power to the Federal Reserve System?"

Congressman Fiesinger: "I say it is illegal. I say it is unconstitutional, as far as it affects the value of basic money. Power to control credits may be in a different class."

Congressman McFadden: "The gentleman recognizes that that was done, does he not?"

Congressman Fiesinger: "Well, I think I recognize that fact; but it may be that Congress intended to delegate banking and credit control and not the control of the basic money values."

Congressman McFadden: " The Federal Reserve System has the power to issue Federal Reserve notes, which circulate as money?"

Congressman Fiesinger: "It has. Of course, they are promises to pay. They are credits or IOU's of the bank."

Congressman McFadden: "And that power was delegated by Congress in the Federal Reserve Act."

Congressman Fiesinger: "Yes, sir; with the intent to regulate the volume of credit."

Congressman McFadden: "And is being pursued by them, which gives the Federal Reserve System control over the money and credit in the United States."....

Congressman Mott: "What does the gentleman say about the delegation by Congress to the President to fix the value of money, under the farm bill?"

Congressman Fiesinger: "I think it was illegal, and the President did not want it. It was forced upon him. He never asked to have the amendment attached to the farm bill. It was forced upon him, and he is exercising the power because he was forced to exercise it; a power that he never wanted, and I say it is all illegal and unconstitutional."

Congressman McFadden: "If the gentleman has been familiar with the activities of Dr. Sprague over the history of the Federal Reserve System, he well knows that Dr. Sprague has been in all of the conferences, practically, between the Bank of England, officers of the Federal Reserve bank in New York and other central banks, which have had for their purpose the dealing with national and international price levels. That was one of the functions that he was exercising as expert adviser of the Bank of England."

Congressman Fiesinger: " Now, I understand that Dr. Sprague at the London conference was willing to peg the dollar to the British pound at $3.50, and, if he had done that, the price levels in America would have been in the control of the Bank of England, and it would have been so low it would have wrecked our national economy."

Congressman Lamneck: "Will the gentleman please insert at this point what Dr. Sprague said about who should control the price level?"

Congressman Fiesinger: "I may say-I did not expect to answer that question, but Dr. Sprague, in a conference he had, stated he believed that the value of gold should be controlled by the British, because they were more competent, from banking experience, so to do." (CR,1-8-1934)

Congressional Record, January 20, 1934

Congressman McFadden: " I am quoting from the President's message to Congress on this very measure. I quote:

"That the title of all gold be in the Government. The total stock will serve as a permanent and fixed metallic reserve which will change in amount only as far as necessary for the settlement of international balances or as may be required by future agreement among nations of the world for a redistribution of the world stock of monetary gold."

"I say again what I have repeatedly said, that there is a definite plan for the redistribution of the gold of this country and of the world's gold. The plan has been known ever since the establishment of the Bank for International Settlements that through that medium, or one similar to it, eventually the redistribution of gold would take place." CR, 1-20-1934)

Congressional Record: February 20, 1934

Congressman McFadden: "Why should the United States be buying gold and paying $35 an ounce for it? Why Should the United States be making Great Britain a present of $14.33 an ounce on the hundreds of millions of dollars of British gold that is being shipped to the United States through this process be favoring four London gold brokers?

Why should the United States set a price of $35 and pay Great Britain an increase of $14.33 on every ounce of gold? This is interesting when you consider that three fourths of all the gold produced in the world is produced in the British Empire. Did we do this because Great Britain demanded it? Is it possible that this $14.33 profit to Great Britain on every ounce of gold shipped into the United States is for settlement of a debt that the United States owes to Great Britain? (CR 2-20-1934)

Congressional Record: March 3, 1934

Congressman Weideman: "So the paramount issue of today is this: Shall the Government of the United States be run for the benefit of the international bankers or shall the citizens of the United States be given the right to 'life, liberty, and the pursuit of happiness'? Shall we replace the Statue of Liberty with the golden statue erected to the god of greed? Shall we forget that the only time our Saviour used force was when he drove the money changers from the temple?

Let us reestablish the principle that we all believe in: That all men are entitled to the right to work, to own their own homes, to reap a just reward for their labors, and to enjoy nature's sunshine as God intended. We owe it to our children that we shall not depart and leave them in a condition of bondage and slavery to organized greed and gold."

Congressman Lemke: "....This nation is bankrupt; every State in this Union is bankrupt; the people of the United States, as a whole, are bankrupt.

The total physical cash value of all the property in the United States is now estimated at about $70,000,000,000. That is more than it would bring if sold at public auction. In this we do not include debts or the evidence of debts, such as bonds, mortgages, and so forth. These are not physical property. They will have to be paid out of the physical property.
How are we going to pay $300,000,000,000 with only $70,000,000,000?" (CR, 3-3-1934)

Congressional Record, March 13, 1934

Congressman McFadden: "In view of what the gentleman has just said, recall that Theodore Roosevelt, the year that he passed on, made a statement to the effect that Felix Frankfurter is the most dangerous man in the United States to our form of government." (CR, 3-13-1934)

Congressional Record, March 15, 1934

Congressman McFadden: "It is right in line with the plan which is now being worked out in England. I want to point out to the House that there is a concerted movement not only in England but in the United States. In the United States this movement is in charge of certain men now engaged in writing legislation in Department of Agriculture.

I refer to Mr. Tugwell, Mr. Mordecai Ezekiel, and Mr. Frank, and their immediate associates, some of whom are in other departments and some of whom are outside; and I may even go so far as to say that they are aided and abetted in this matter apparently by the Secretary of Agriculture.

One of the stalwarts against the move in England is Stanley Baldwin. Mr. Baldwin issued a statement which was printed in the United States recently. It was a statement made over the radio, and, if I have time, I will read it to you, because he is standing today against the movement in England that I am speaking against now, and that movement is evidenced by this legislation and any other kind of legislation following, which have for their purpose the regimenting of all production in the United States, leading up to an absolute dictatorship.

The quotation I refer to from Mr. Baldwin is as follows:

"Our freedom did not drop down like manna from heaven. It has been fought for from the beginning of our history and the blood of men has been shed to obtain it. It is the result of centuries of resistance to the power of the executive and it has brought us equal justice, trial by jury, freedom of worship, and freedom of religious and political opinion. Democracy is far the most difficult form of government because it requires for perfect functioning the participation of everybody.

"Democracy wants constant guarding, and for us to turn to a dictatorship would be an act of consummate cowardice, of surrender, of confession that our strength and courage alike had gone. It is quite true the wheels of our state coach may be creaking in heavy ground, but are you sure the wheels of the coach are not creaking in Moscow, Berlin, and Vienna, and even in the United States?

"The whole tendency of a dictatorship is to squeeze out the competent and independent man and create a hierarchy accustomed to obeying. Chaos often results when the original dictator goes. The rise of communism or fascism-both alike believe in force as a means of establishing their dictatorship -- would kill everything that had been grown by our people for the last 800 or 1,000 years."

The plan in England to which I am referring is the "political economic plan", drawn up by Israel Moses Sief, the director of a chain-store enterprise in England called Marks & Spencer. This enterprise declared a dividend of 40 percent for 1933, and was enabled to do so by the fact that it has until now handled almost exclusively all imports from Soviet Russia, which has enabled this house to undersell competitors.....

The political economic plan is in operation in the British Government by the means of a tariff advisory board. This organization has gathered all data and statistics obtained by governmental and private organization in administrative, industrial, trade, social, educational, agricultural, and other circles. Air-force statistics are in their hands, as well as those of the law and medical professions. This organization or group have had access to all archives of the British Government, just as the 'brain trust' here in the United States have had access to archives of our Government departments.

Through the tariff advisory board, which was created in February of 1933, and headed by Sir George May, the control of industry and trade is being firmly established in the British Empire. This tariff advisory board works in direct connection with the Treasury, and together with it devises the tariff policy.

In this bill and the tariff bill which follows it is proposed to set up just such a board, under the direction of the President, as the tariff advisory board of England. The tariff board in England has been granted the powers of a law court and can exact under oath that all information concerning industry and trade be given it.

The tariff board is composed, in addition to Sir George May, of Sir Sidney Chapman, professor of economics and statistics, and Sir George Allen Powell, of the British Food Board and Food Council. And it is a well-known fact that this particular political economic group has close connection with the Foreign Policy Association in New York. I wish to quote from a letter from a correspondent of mine abroad, as follows:

"It appears that the alleged 'brain trust' is supposed to greatly influence the present United States policy. Neither you nor I are particularly interested in what takes place in England, but what should interest us both, it seems to me, is that there is a strong possibility that certain members of the 'brain trust' around our President are undoubtedly in touch with this British organization and possibly are working to introduce a similar plan in the United States.

"I understand the brain trust' is largely composed of Professor Frankfurter, Professor Moley, Professor Tugwell, Adolph Berle, William C. Bullitt and the mysterious Mordecai Ezekiel. I think there is no doubt that these men all belong to this particular organization with distinct Bolshevik tendencies.

I am assured by serious people, who are in a position to know, that this organization practically controls the British Government, and it is the opinion of those who do know that this highly organized and well-financed movement is intended to practically Sovietize the English-speaking race. I wish to quote again from my correspondent, as follows:

Some two months ago when Israel Moses Sieff, the present head of this organization, was urged to show more activity by the members of his committee, he said, "Let us go slowly for a while and wait until we see how our plan carries out in America." (CR, 3-15-1934)

Congressional Record, April 9, 1934

Congressman Patman: "....A Federal Reserve bank has a great privilege. It has the right to issue a blanket mortgage on all the property of all the people of this country. It is called a Federal Reserve note.

For that privilege section 16 of the act provides that when the Government prints a Federal Reserve note and guarantees to pay that note and delivers it to a Federal Reserve bank, that Federal Reserve bank shall pay -- it seems to be mandatory -- the rate of interest that is set by the Federal Reserve Board.

The law has never been put into effect. The Federal Reserve Board sets the zero rate. Instead of charging an interest rate which the law says they shall charge, they set no rate at all. Therefore, for the use of this great Government credit, these blanket mortgages that are issued against all the property of all the people of this Nation and against the incomes of all the people of this Nation, they do not pay one penny.

Not one penny of the stack of the Federal Reserve banks is owned by the Government or the people, but it is owned by private banks exclusively. They do not pay one penny for the use of that great privilege, to the people or to the Government. (CR, 4-9-1934)

Congressional Record, June 14, 1934

Congressman McFadden: " We were advised by reports from London last Sunday of the arrival of George L. Harrison, Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, and we were advised that accompanying him was Mr. Crane, the Deputy Governor, and James P. Warburg, of the Kuhn- Loeb banking family, of New York and Hamburg, Germany, and also Mr. O. M. W. Sprague, recently in the pay of Great Britain as chief economic and financial adviser of Mr. Norman, Governor of the Bank Of England, and now supposed to represent our Treasury.

The Federal Reserve System, headed by George L. Harrison, is our premier, who is dealing with debts behind the closed doors of the Bank of England; and the United States Treasury is there, represented by O. M. W. Sprague, who until the last 10 days was the representative of the Bank of England, and by Mr. James P. Warburg, who is the son of the principal author of the federal Reserve Act. Many things are being settled behind the closed doors of the Bank of England by this group.

Mr. Warburg, you undoubtedly know, is the head of the international Jewish financial group who were largely responsible for the loaning abroad of the vast billions of dollars by the people of the United States and which loans are now frozen.

We must not overlook the fact, however, that J. P. Morgan & Co. were close seconds in these transactions, and in connection with this I wish to point out that George L. Harrison, Governor of the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, is closely identified with the Morgan House in all of the undertakings internationally in which the Federal Reserve banks participated. (CR-6-14-1934)

Congressional Record, June 14, 1934

Congressman McFadden: "....Whereas the lobbying activities of the said British Ambassador, Sir Ronald Lindsay, have for their purpose the taking from the United States Treasury of assets which it is the sworn duty of this Government to protect by every means within its power, not stopping short of war, if need be;; and whereas the lobbying activities of Sir Ronald Lindsay likewise have for their object the overthrow of the Government of the United States and its reorganization as a part of the British Empire:.... (CR, 6-14-1934)

Congressional Record: June 15, 1934

Congressman McFadden: "… a man named Jacob Schiff came to this country as the agent of certain foreign money lenders. He was born in one of the Rothschilds' houses in Frankfurt, Germany. At Hamburg he entered the Warburg banking establishment. The Warburgs of Hamburg are bankers of long standing, with branches in Amsterdam and Sweden.....

Russia had a powerful enemy in this man, Jacob Schiff. The people of the United States were to believe that this enmity of his was caused by wrongs done to Russian Jews. I look elsewhere for the motives which animated him. School children in this country were told Jewish children were crippled for life by Russian soldiers wielding the knout. By unfair means a wedge was driven between Russia and the United States.

One of Schiff's schemes was a sort of wholesale importation of Russian Jews into the United States. Aided by Schiff and his associates, many Russian Jews came to this country about that time and were naturalized here.
I come now to the time when war was declared between Russia and Japan. This was bought about by a skillful use of Japan so that England would not have to fight Russia in India. It was cheaper and more convenient for England to have Japan fight Russia than to do it herself.

As was to be expected, Schiff and his London associates financed Japan. They drew immense quantities of money out of the United States for that purpose. The background for the loans they floated in this country had been skillfully prepared. The "sob stuff", of which Schiff was a master, had sunk into the hearts of sympathetic Americans.

The loans were a great success. Millions of American dollars were sent to Japan by Schiff and his London associates. England's stranglehold on India was made secure. Russia was prevented from entering the Khyber Pass and falling on India from the northwest. Japan at the same time was built up and became a great world power, and as such is now facing us in the Pacific.

While the Russo-Japanese War was in progress President Theodore Roosevelt offered to act as peacemaker, and a conference between representatives of the belligerents was arranged to take place at Portsmouth, N.H. When the Portsmouth Conference took place, Jacob Schiff attended it and used such influence as he had with Theodore Roosevelt to win favors for Japan at the expense of Russia.

His main object, then as always, was humiliation of Russians, whose only crime was that they were Russians and not Jews. He endeavored to humiliate the Russians, but Count Witte, the Russian plenipotentiary, did not allow him to succeed in this attempt.

Mr. Speaker, the restrictions upon Jews in Russia at that time may or may not have been onerous. But onerous or not, before the Russians had time to change them, Schiff had the 80-year-old-treaty of friendship and good will between Russia and the United States denounced. Speaking of this matter, Count Witte says in his autobiography: "The Russians lost the friendship of the American people."

Mr. Speaker, the people of the United States should not permit financial interests or any other special interests to dictate the foreign policy of the United States Government …You have witnessed the unlawful seizure by Franklin D. Roosevelt of gold reserves and other values belonging to the people of the United States, the destruction of banks, the attempted whitewashing of the Federal Reserve Board and Federal Reserve banks, the corruption of which he admitted in his campaign harangues; and you may have noticed that what was confiscated is not in the hands of the present constitutional Government but in the hands of the international bankers who are the nucleus of the new government Roosevelt is seeking to establish here.

Roosevelt's actions are not in accordance with the Constitution of the United States. They are in accordance with the plans of the Third International.

At the present time the Soviet Union is in debt. From the date of Trotzky's return to Russia the course of Russian history has, indeed, been greatly affected by the operations of international bankers. They have acted through German and English institutions and have kept Russia in bondage to themselves.

Their relatives in Germany have drawn immense sums of money from the United States and have in turn financed their agents in Russia at a handsome profit. The Soviet Government has been given United States Treasury funds by the Federal Reserve banks acting through the Chase Bank and the Guaranty Trust Co. and other banks in New York City.

England, no less than Germany, has drawn money from us through the Federal Reserve banks and has re-lent it at high rates of interest to the Soviet Government or has used it to finance her sales to Soviet Russia and her engineering works within the Russian boundaries.

Mr. Speaker, an immense amount of United States money has been used abroad in preparations for war and in the acquisition and the manufacture of war supplies. Mr. Speaker, the United States should look before it leaps into another war, especially a war in Asia. It should decide whether it is worth while to join hands with Russia and China in a war against Japan.

For myself, I say and I have said it often that the United States should remember George Washington's advice. It should mind its own business and stay home.

It should not permit the Jewish international bankers to drive it into another war so that they and their gentile fronts, by way of Louis McHenry Howe, may reap rich profits on everything an army needs from toilet kits to airplanes, submarines, tanks gas masks, poison gas, ammunition, bayonets, guns, and other paraphernalia and instruments of destruction. (CR, June 15, 1934)