[least sexy] of the celebs, that is

One of my handful of Russian readers has seen fit to enter into the debate here and here over the Самые несексуальные женщины года.

She's not the best but I can still think of others worse amongst the celebs. See lower right:

And have you seen Julia Middleton?

Monday [2 to 7]

Another Manic Monday.

7.  Here's another actuality

Pfizer to vaccinate entire city in Brazil as part of study.

"Pfizer announced that it would fully vaccinate everyone in the city over the age of 12 so it can carry out a study of the safety and effectiveness of the vaccine."

In the NYT, that bastion of truth approved by Blgr of course.  Details at t'other place just in case.  Uh huh, this is the same Pfizer which has the secret ingredient it never announces, nor its connection with Sinopeg. Right, got that.

6.  Now, here's an actuality

... such as referred to in N4, in fact more actual because it is reported by the Telegraph, details at t'other place:

“The chief executive of the UK Health Security Agency said today that Covid was possibly no more dangerous than flu.”

OK, it appears her name is 'Dr.' Jennie Harries.  Wonder if she's a medical doctor or PhD in some arts subject?  BSc in pharmacology - right, so not a doctor but a pharmacist it seems.

5.  Dealing with the Quaker closure issue

Sooner or later, we must all face it, so why postpone the dreaded day, let's deal with it now as grown men and women - how does one effectively close the packet?

The conundrum with carols

Firstly, just had chicken broth ... tell you what ... nice. Now, best I do this while I still can and sorry, but I must name names, plus I'm going to relate it as it happened.

With a fair idea of the carols until Christmas, it struck me that I'd not done much in the American line until after Christmas ... you know, that Marine Corps band and their humorous renditions, that sort of thing. The serious carols, the historic ones, do tend to be European.

However Toodles was saying to me that as a child, she loved Away in a Manger and O Little Town of Bethlehem, which were wonderful for a sweet child. She hastened to add that she was not asking for me to play them, which of course guarantees that I shall.

(This is going to be a very long post, readers.)

All right, so I'm thinking ... hmmmm, let's have an American afternoon of carols. First I found was fine ... Gentleman Jim Reeves, with Mary's Boy Child ... and I'm thinking of our curmudgeons here and their reaction ... this selection is not for Sceptr'd Islanders per se. 

So fine, his voice is good, good background to his life, a nice carol. Number one:

Looking around for a second carol from America ... Do You Hear What I Hear? ... and there's Martina McBride ... er, her voice is not so great for carols, it's more for drawled country songs ... great for those. All right, I keep looking around and there are dozens of female celebs, even Mariah Carey ... what's wrong with these people? Why must they "interpret" a carol? Mangle it beyond recognition so that it becomes an ego trip for the artist? And as for their personal lives!  I mean ... not looking for a saint but at least let it be a 'good' woman (or man).

Finally, I find a good one with a weird name ... Órla Fallon ... lovely voice, nice treatment of the carol. Then I see she's not American. Oops. Still, it's a nice carol, so number two.

I usually run three songs but Toodles has two so what the heck, let's do it. Bethlehem ... I'm going to read out just some of the versions ... Nat King Cole (have you seen his private life, that of a satyr?) ... Sarah McLachlan, nice voice (but cursory investigation and she's occult, into Lilith etc.) ... Cedarmont Kids, reasonable until the camera fixates on the black boy and fair girl (plus something ultra-contrived about it (more later).

Hmmmm ... Hayley Westenra, some superstar teenager and don't she knowitt?  Dan Forrest ... ah, he's an American:

Er ... he can't play, he's off key, includes the wrong notes in chords.  This is becoming frustrating.  

Perry Como ... ah, good, a good man ... but Perry's not great here, the ole crooner, and the backing singers are awful. Hmmmm ... Brighouse, a brass band ... ok but a brass band for an intimate carol? Anne Murray ... can't sing. Choir of Clare College ... ah, good, they can sing ... oops, British.  

Natalie Raynes ... bashing away at the johanna like a school ma'am or piano teacher (oops, she is a piano teacher, listing her scale of $$$$$ charges).  Well what then?  Are there any I can run?

All right, let's go with her instrumental, karaoke style with lyrics displayed (was about to run this, then saw it was the BBC) ... so, Natalie:

Now to Away in a Manger.

In frustration, I thought Pentatonix acapella would shirley do it justice. Starts ok, pans to the female ... dress split to the waist, breasts half hanging out. On a Christmas carol ... aaaggghhh! 

Well Home Free then?  It's ok but they're grinning, not taking it seriously ... plenty of real baby there for Toods and other gals but men start kissing it ... it's not up to scratch, this version.

Sigh. And there's something else ... they're singing the wrong tune. Yet some singers did have the right tune ... Toronto Mendelssohn for example, in fact most Canadian renditions had it right.

This one though, though certainly pretty, was playing some sort of country rhythm "Home on the Range" type tune.

Hmmmm, what's going on here? So, to Wikipedia, if you can get past them going all leftwing with Musk:

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Away_in_a_Manger

Ah, I finally understand. Scroll down to the Music section and all is revealed.  There are two distinct tunes ... one, called Murray or Mueller, is only in the USA, all others around the world use Kirkpatrick or Cradle Song.  Both are American, so qualify, but the Americans don't seem to like the second American one. Ok, got that.  The second does sound more like a hymn in church ... listen to both there.

But which to play?  Why do these things have to happen?

Horror descends

As if that weren't enough, I went back to Cedar something Kids ... plenty of babies being kissed by kids but there's something a bit contrived all the same. So I click on their website ... blocked. Allo allo allo, what's this?

Next one has some nursery teacher going through all these actions ... rocking a baby (pretending) and suddenly, she's making satanist horned handsigns. Whaaaaa?  Whole thing is off, really off.

You know ... Disney, commercial hiring out of kids ... quite offputting the way YT is getting into this. All right, I have to play something so let's hope this isn't some cult:

Thursday all day

Just a look back, some analysis of what has just been, before we get to today's material.

3.  Back to the less than pleasant

Gamely brought to us by our determined Steve:

a.  Maricopa County:

Maricopa County Is At It Again! Arizona Residents Are Receiving The Wrong Mail-In Ballot For Local 2021 Election

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/10/maricopa-county-arizona-residents-receiving-wrong-mail-ballot-local-2021-election/

b.  Fulton County:

Georgia Judge Ends Effort to Audit 2020 Election Ballots in Fulton County

c.  The Donald:

President Trump Releases Statement on Georgia Judge’s Decision Dismissing Inspection of Fraudulent Fulton County Ballots

Thursday [5 to 10]

10.  Breaking just now

a.  Via DR:

https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2021/06/antrim-county-attorney-deperno-releases-bombshell-report-claims-county-voting-machines-remotely-logged-decertifies-entire-antrim-election/

This, if extrapolated across the country, obviously means the usurpers must go down.  My feeling is this will be the civil war.

b.  My bed has just broken under me and that’s going to be my time taken up until dark.  I’ll click through comments but am building, not blogging.

c.  Am listening to Paul Temple Spencer Affair, suspect it will be the usual mastermind but have been hoping, just once, that it will be a femme fatale and there’s a chance of it this time.  The formula says no but there’s an entrepreneurial woman involved.  One can only hope she’s the baddie.

9.  DR

[This is all DR's I have from Tuesday [7] onwards.]

a.  "Royals and politicians are among celebrities and wealthy business figures who used the SAME secret phone network as hundreds of crime kingpins as UK police smash encoded EncroChat app" Source: Daily Fail 

Subtle hint there - royals, pollies and celebs and crime kingpins in same sentence? "PETER NAVARRO UNLEASHED: “Fauci was Mastermind of a Coverup – The Coverup Is ALWAYS Greater than the Crime” " 

Monday [20 to 26]

Evening all.

26.  The right people won

I'd not have known, had it not been on Gab:

Anti-vaxxer and Russian born honey.  Like it.

25.  Meanwhile, in France

Via IYE:

24.  Just a reminder from April

23.  Just thought I'd run

... some blurry shots of celebs we all admire and love.  Not a complete list of course:

22.  Murder mystery

You might like to explore Acuitas in Canada and its shareholders.  Then try Apotex and Barry Sherman.  Interesting eh?

21.  Some screenshots

20.  Good advice for anyone posting or commenting on a blog

By Semper Vigilat on Gab:

“We caution everyone to be very careful when viewing or sharing any content from Hunter Biden’s iCloud account. Please be aware that sharing content, especially Child Porn is illegal regardless of the context.

This particularly refers to Biden H photographing Natalie Biden [daughter of Beau and Hallie Biden] on all fours, near naked, cocaine up her nose.

Thank you.

Sunday [1]

Wikipedia "editors", a euphemism for closed shop Wokism, oft write: "this article has multiple issues" and goodness but does this morning's TDS (below) ever have issues, few of which are down to their misleading but which far highlight more the very problems of information transference, confirmation bias, a priori assumptions, academic fashion, plus the snuffing out of discussion of clear anomalies.

From the get-go, there's the issue of even understanding that opening paragraph above and for those even able to take that onboard is my arrogant questioning of someone's intellectual capacity, illustrated nicely in the comment I've retained for well over a decade on my "others say" page:

"You want to know why? Because you are a cretin.  You are a mad man, of limited intellect, with an axe to grind.  You come over as slightly unhinged."

I've always loved the "slightly" bit there and must acknowledge that the lady's daughter did ask me to take it down, said lady having a bad day at the time but it does illustrate how manner and choice of words can sway, before any "facts" can even be established:

There's also the point Chuckles used to make about lefty academics:

... and how far one can trust a child or at least a child-brain, as in the opening item here:

... where cheerleading for respective camps causes said cheerleaders to cherry pick which bits of data they'll choose to run with ... and which will simply be ignored, often under instructions from the Central Planning Committee.

Then we get to paywall news outlets being any way to determine truth ... wot, you'd take on board anything written by intergenerational marxist Toynbee or the quite unintellectual feminist Codswallop (see Arron Banks) or back to said boy wonder Jones?

You do see just some of the issues of people with the vote relying on such sources for "truth" ... and what of the Hitchens celebs? Piers Morgan?  It becomes bewildering. Humans start choosing "trusted sources" based on many criteria, not all being ruthlessly ferreting with neither fear nor favour.

And that child in the photo above ... her very looks are against her ... better a wizened old professor perhaps or caustic bstd who rips apart humbug at the seams and who takes no prisoners?

Then we look at the techniques used in research and data manipulation:

https://nourishingobscurity.blogspot.com/2008/02/groupthink-gentle-art-of-persuasion.html

http://archive-random-nour-obscur.blogspot.com/2006/10/appendix.html

... including:

http://archive-random-nour-obscur.blogspot.com/2006/10/appendix-h.html

... and:

Perry Mason, advocate, had just finished pointing out an anomaly in Sergeant Holcombe’s evidence in a murder trial and now asked, ‘Does that seem logical to you?’

Sergeant Holcombe hesitated a moment, then said, ‘Well, that’s one of those little things. That doesn’t cut so much ice. Lots of times you’ll find little things which are more or less inconsistent with the general interpretation of evidence.'

‘I see,’ Mason said. ‘And when you encounter such little things, what do you do, Sergeant?’

‘You just ignore ’em,’ said Holcombe.

‘And how many such things have you ignored, Sergeant, in reaching your [current] conclusion?’ 

A girl at one university asked me to tell her what Bloom's taxonomy was saying or Dewey or Piaget and I told her that she was meant to feel overwhelmed by the sheer weight of their grossly oversimplified and cherrypicked marxist rantings, designed for intellectual retards ... which hardly helped in the task set by her lecturer ... and so it goes on. 

It did not help with the security of my tenure either.

And why should anything academic turn out to be treated as gospel, while Adam Smith or Karl Popper are ignored?  But even the latter's "empirical falsification" has its limits when something spiritual is involved ... empiricism is great to be sure but is it the only test of weighty matters of other dimensions or even the dark edges of our solar system?

And then we get to the deathjab ... we have collated at our sites more than enough, I'd say, to at least question the way the jabs were rolled out ... to establish at least reasonable doubt ... before even starting on "climate science" and king chas's bollox at copulate 28 in Dubai.

Before even getting onto the Irish govt's severe punishments to any poor sods they've hacked and found questioning the govt line.

And so on.

Friday [5]

There are some core principles we really must consider before proceeding.  In no particular order:

The self-satisfied friend versus the intense dissident ranter

The first chappie I'm thinking of would be a friend of mine, a type if you like, whom I was friendly with in my early blogging days but who has largely shunned me since over wild, unsubstantiated conspiracy theories and equally wild ways of putting them.  We're just not respectable at N.O. dontchaknow, no one sane would be seen anywhere near us.

Now that events are overtaking such worldly-wise chaps, they're in a bit of a pickle because the new events must be shoe-horned into the old, calm world view.  They still believe in global trade, they still check the charts daily, they read all the ravings on this blog and really - only 15% of our sources are worth anything they say, things like Daily Expose we can bin straight away.  James and readers are to be humoured, it's all happened before in history and will happen again.  No chappie urbane and good natured could think otherwise.

There are, though, other people of 'questionable' qualifications according to this natural friend of mine from days of yore - questionable people like Doctors Malone,  Malcolm Kendrick, Mike Yeadon, there's Judy Mikovits and others and as for nutters like Archibishop Vigano - well he's Catholic, isn't he?  People like Ann Barnhardt and him are crazy bible bashing Papists.  So the line of thinking goes.

And thus our urbane, educated, very British chappy is sleepwalking into what's coming. 

Monday [1 to 4]

Early.

4.  Vox

Depopulation was the goal from the start and the globalists are now openly waging war on fertilizer and human fertility alike. And if you still can’t see that, well, you’re simply not very smart.

https://voxday.net/2022/07/24/nemesis-arrives/

3.  Make up and hair

It was always tacitly agreed, between certain ladies I'd known and me, that hair and cosmetics were not my affair ... I stayed well out of the boudoir and praised whatever was the finished product which emerged ... but youtube, recently, has had other ideas.  In the sidebar, they often drop in hair or cosmetics 'tutorials' and of course, the moment you click on one, you're flooded.

Thought it interesting enough to post on for all sorts of reasons.

For a start, there are two main types - the cosmetic, from Tanya Burr and other privateers to the salons themselves and that was eye-opening, plus the hair tutorials, mainly salon posted but also privateers.

The shock to me was why someone like Jessica Alba or Rosie Hunt Whatever would bother going onto some vlogger's channel and not only that but she'd be right into it - mutual admiration society.  Then I saw the numbers - 20 million subscibers?  300k?  So someone like Jessica Alba could easily flog her new products that way.

Chaps ... this is an entirely different world to ours but I can say I can now do a triple parting chignon or braids or can defoliate, cleanse, prime and lay foundation and the rest of it, when to apply the concealer.  Where I'd fall down is in colour choice from the palettes but she'd know that.

Which brings me to my first observation ... I do NOT like men involved, nor tatts on the rough women, I just clicked out if those.  And why must those men all be mincing?  Why can't they be manly and still ply their trade in salons?  No matter.

Another thing which stunned was that the ladies could all do the most complicated hairdos themselves, inc. the said chignon.  Talented.  But I preferred when lady did lady, because then you could learn technique better.  The salons were the best, IMHO.

There were hits and misses ... one I saw a minute of was some kids and it was bad, no idea of colour, application and eyes were nearly poked out. Got out of there fast.

Saddest part were those like the celebs who'd joke about quick coverage or updo for the regular walk of shame.  That's the standard lifestyle they see females having today?  That's where I lost interest.

https://youtu.be/I0RPLoeoosc

2.  Matthew H on Gab

We went to sleep in the early morning hours of Nov 4, 2020 with Trump leading in every swing state, and when we woke up a few hours later they had miraculously "found" all the votes Biden needed to win. Suitcases, boards over windows, the "water main break" in GA - it was a coup.

1.  Evets 1

a.  Clanet Povid (Two Worlds Edition):

Tedros overrules W.H.O. to declare COVID Vaccine-induced Shingles (Monkeypox) a Public Health Emergency of International Concern

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/24/tedros-covid-vaccine-shingles-emergency/

b.  “Monkeypox” is only circulating in countries where the Pfizer Vaccine has been distributed & is being used to advance a Technocratic Great Reset

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/24/monkeypox-pfizer-connection-great-reset/

c.  Breaking News We Can't Speak About is on the Website

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k9WTXOcPqG0&t=2s

d.  Eleven Children Report Serious Injury From the Vaccines Versus Zero Serious Cases of Covid, Official Data From Iceland Show

https://dailysceptic.org/2022/07/24/eleven-children-report-serious-injury-from-the-vaccines-versus-zero-serious-cases-of-covid-official-data-from-iceland-show/

e.  Covid “Vaccine” News: What Respectable Experts Have Said This Week

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/24/covid-vaccine-news-what-respectable-experts-say/

f.  British Taxpayers Are Not Happy About NHS Services

https://expose-news.com/2022/07/24/british-taxpayers-arent-happy-about-nhs-services/

Easter Monday [2 to 4]

(0500)

4.  Businesses are under their control

https://dailysceptic.org/2023/04/09/controversial-woke-scorecard-encourages-corporates-to-endorse-celebs-like-dylan-mulvaney/

A little-known index appears to be an important motivator for big companies to offer lucrative branding deals to divisive influencers like Dylan Mulvaney. The Corporate Equality Index (CEI) rates American businesses according to how woke they are on issues like sexual orientation and gender identity. The CEI is overseen by an LGBTQ+ political lobbying group called Human Rights Campaign (HRC). 

The New York Post has the story. 

Businesses that attain the maximum 100 total points earn the coveted title “Best Place to Work for LGBTQ Equality”. Fifteen of the top 20 Fortune-ranked companies received 100% ratings last year, according to HRC data. …

The HRC, which was formed in 1980 and started the CEI in 2002, is led by Kelley Robinson who was named as [the organisation’s] President in 2022 and worked as a political organiser for Barack Obama’s 2008 presidential campaign.

3.  Amren

https://www.amren.com/blog/2023/04/the-fall-of-townson-maryland/

Years ago, I lived in Towson, Maryland. It was a very wealthy area with a Starbucks every two miles and a five-story mall. Then one day, Baltimore started running buses to Towson, and the city went downhill fast. Property values plunged, everyone started moving out (including my family), and stores started shutting down and leaving the mall. Nobody wanted to take their family shopping there because of the mobs of young black teenagers from the city. 

2.  Consider

To answer Mary Miller with another question ... why did the Crim Clown Zelenskyy close the churches?  Why was there not the slightest notice taken, officially, of those shooting victims at the Christian school?  Why the London festival of some religion nothing to do with Britain but not a word about the meaning of Easter or to be more accurate ... Resurrection?

And to answer ... it is not way off beam to say that all the miscreants mentioned since midnight here are simply playing for the other side.  Yet so, so difficult for most to wrap their heads around.

Monday [10 to 14]

Late afternoon.

14.  Now and Next on EVs

https://rolfnorfolk.substack.com/p/evs-blowin-in-the-wind

13.  IYE

"Russia Reveals Antarctica Is Not What We're Being Told!"

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zh-2ndWRW54

{Apart from a smidgin of global moaning/climate change blah blah quite interesting, imho}

12.  Andy

I suppose one reanimated ancient Egyptian felt offended, so we all have to take the metaphorical knee. 

https://amp.lbc.co.uk/news/mummy-offensive-dehumanising-banned-ancient-egypt-museums-edinburgh/

11. Interesting what Ian J sent

Is Clarkson starting the fight-back?

https://www.zerohedge.com/political/clarkson-fights-back-goes-offensive-against-woke-take-over

Clarkson and, say, Morgan are two peas in a pod … right up themselves as super celebs who are allowed to behave badly, yet not in any politically useful way until now.

Still not convinced because the ‘conversion’ was only triggered by the treatment of him himself, not by the treatment of millions.

10.  These

Tuesday [11]

Before starting this, there’s a heck of a lot going on just now over at NOWP.

The Intellectual Dark Web

Who is maybe the most vehement opponent of the much adored Jordan Peterson? I don’t mean amongst the Wokerati, as they see him as the devil incarnate, e.g. Cathy Newman.  No, I mean among “us”, the supposed dissident right?

Vox Day, right?

But now I find another … and in far more detail, far more, in her own inimitable fashion. I know when she’s waffling, when she’s a heat seeking missile … and in this, she’s the latter.  My own stance, until looking at Polly’s video, was that I respect Vox, I respect her … in particular because her eye for detail usually turns out to be right, e.g. in what’s behind the deathjab.  She it was who broke Event 201.

Right … and on Peterson? There are way too many questions, and they show no sign of abating.  What about Ben Shapiro?  Bought of course, I never go to Breitbart if it can be helped. The GWP?  Don’t trust them, caught out too many times. Before it’s News? They’ve been shredded. Epoch? Nope, cashing in, often days later, hard sell.  Alex Jones?  A real anomaly. Sandy Hook is in no way a closed issue, yet he agrees to pay out big time?  Whoa!

And so it goes on. Candace O was criticised by our people here, I looked again and she’s not intellectual, let’s say. Rogan … don’t trust him over so many things.  Christina Hoff Summers?  Seemed good but some feminazi stances had me quite puzzled.  So look at these two charts from Polly:

Looking again at that first chart, what were they all up to? Right of centre for profit. Not for enlightenment. Elon Musk is in there … what’s the first thing he does?  Implements buying blue ticks … why does that remind me of Led Zeppelin?

But for me, the biggest puzzle is … what connects Vox and Polly?  They do not quote one another, I can’t see a connection …

Ahhh … except one. One clip of Peterson had someone ask him if he believed in God? He waffled, went into deep sophistry, started talking about defining one’s terms. To a real Christian, as Polly pointed out, you just say, “Yes.”

Now there are many of our readers who would give a straight, “No.” That’s intellectually honest, that’s setting out your stall.  That’s not waffling. But these other celebs hide behind their waffling.  Why?  Because a huge number of dissident anti-Woke are Christian, in a real way.

How can I tell?  Because it’s not unlike the Masonic handshake … members recognise one another. We suddenly attack, for example, the antiPope or Welby.  Now that doesn’t take a Christian, most at N.O. do that.  But there are questions when some of us see someone waffling … and that’s a dead giveaway.

It’s not unlike Tulsi Gabbard pushing her “rightwing” credentials. We don’t even see ourselves that way … I call myself antiWoke.  The antiWoke space is now being gradually taken over and occupied … look at James O’Keefe, at past heads of Breitbart, at Michelle Gold, at Mark Steyn … one by one, shut out and their former space occupied by “safe to the establishment” GB News types such as Farage, who sold us out.

Some of the least forgiving people are Christians, real ones, because they can smell bullsh a mile off.  The biggest prob is when they do the hard sell evangelising, which is why I try not to and I myself run a mile if I see two men in suits come to my door with a bible. I’ll tell you now … I’m doing a post at some stage on the filioque clause … most interesting, so be warned that that’s coming up … why there was that schism.

But coming back to the intellectual dark web … what do those people actually stand for?  Polly goes into that if you’re interested.

Heavy stuff for early Sunday morning

This is being started at 02:27, Sunday, May 8th already for us, US Mothers Day coming up.  It's fundamental and necessary in my 'umble, this post.  I've just been going through Evetsdrops [regulars understand] in fine detail ... each webpage sent ... and evaluating.

Why at 02:31?  Because there are roadworks ... no bollox, it's within three hundred yards of my window and it's occasional.  No complaints but cannot sleep through it, so instead started reading, a good time to do that, after a good three hours sleep. My own health, given age, heart meds and the usual aches and pains is that the mind is clear enough, the memory not.  I'm fine, maybe 80%, plenty of coffee.

All right, down to biz.  How to evaluate what N.O. is bringing you?  

Let's tackle agency and agenda first.  In other words, what is N.O. trying to sell?  It's trying to present the literature as best we, as laymen and women, can.  It can seemingly jump between belief, for example, that there is no isolated cv ... and that there is.  We tend to listen to Mikovits, Malone, others in the field but also all the rest we present ... just in case.

The second question is maybe even more crucial ... what are we trying to shut out?  Well, Wokery coming down from above, through agencies, the whole false thing being pushed whilst at the same time, supported views opposite to theirs are suppressed ... see Gates's latest, plus Obama's recently.

Sunday [6 to 10]

10.  I normally don't quote Gatestone of late 

Steve does that part of it - but I did see this by Mark Steyn:

• I have lived in countries that have real domestic terrorism movements.... No country blessed enough not to have a domestic terrorism movement should be inventing one.

• We are living in a blizzard of lies.

• [W]e are more dependent on a handful of woke billionaires to tell us what reality is. They are far more open than ever that they get to determine what are the agreed facts.

Right Mark, a major player on the alt scene.  Now go to the Rumble vid via haiku I've buried and there it is - it explains who owns what and why this goes on and on and on.

9.  Rossa's mother

https://gab.com/GuardAmerican/posts/106955677047951195

Have you been watching what happened yesterday at the so called rally which hardly anyone turned up to apart from 200 so called journalists and all these feds.  Looks like the whole thing was a reverse set up to out the feds, hence this comment on this gab. Our side obviously are so fed up (pun intended) with what the Feds keep doing so pulled a sting on them.  It's been a good laugh all morning with each revelation.  

Wimmin of note

Born 1930, still alive, singing star of the 50s, on February 8, 1960 she became one of the first stars to be honored on the Hollywood Walk of Fame. Some Americans might know of perky PK:

Similar era, born in Subiaco, GL was from the Golden Age of Hollywood:

Highly controversial figure, I could write an essay on LF … largely detested by family and public, disliked by people such as Roger Moore … seems to me her hubby bought himself trouble in this May-December, tragic end to both.  There are some women who just have that irrational ability to enslave, Henry VIII knew about that:

Just a beach scene, no “celebs” in particular:

Saturday [7 to 10]

Best get up I suppose and do some work.

10.  Steve Kirsch

YouTube temporarily suspends Sen Ron Johnson's [R-Wisconsin] channel over COVID-19 'misinformation' as YouTube has determined that nobody has died from the COVID vaccines. Stunning. YouTube also believes that masks work. Whatever the CDC says, YouTube believes. No critical thinking skills required.

Right.  We've run enough on this Wojcicki yes-woman and I'm not going to reopen all that now.

9.  When a female acts like a lady

There was an issue raised by blonde and I wrote this over there:

Pity Rebecca gets it wrong at the start and then, even though he acts decently throughout, she chooses to start bringing in the F word, which adds nothing and is hardly ladylike.  One of her poorer efforts although the issue is important and the conclusion is of course right.  Shall post on this now.  I do wish women on our side would start acting like ladies.  Most do.  Robyn never swears afa I know.

There it is.  Now, onto the issue.  

Saturday [4 to 7]

(0706) Morning all. Bleah out there. (0827)

7.  Kathy Gyngell’s email feed newsletter today

“Andrew's other guest panellists were the Swiss lawyer Philipp Kruse, Dr Meryl Nass, the US physician who successfully treated covid patients with ivermectin and hydroxychloroquine. She is suing the Maine Medical Board who suspended her over 'misinformation'.

Kruse explained how the WHO, unconstitutionally, intends to remove our fundamental right of self-determination, what the starting point of our debate must be, the timeline of the treaties we are working to as well as the (treacherous) amendments to the International Health Regulations. 

His speech brought out how easily we can be gulled by the complex technical process, legalistic but misleading language and the painstaking effort required to untangle and challenge it. They, at the WHO and UN, are paid to this. We are not. You can listen to my (amateur) recording of Andrew's introduction and his speech here.”

6.  Time for another all in one OpEd

a.  The letter I and the single apostrophe

For some reason, when these two symbols start a line, the ipad will not “select” the text, nor allow anything else at the start of that line … same on both pads.

I’d therefore ask our key guys and gals if they’d watch out for those, as it throws things out in the redaction. Ta. (There were two examples today.)

b.  Bona fides of pundits

“Nourishing Obscurity” was never intended to be as a lesson for other pundits … it was just a name to use for the blog … when I saw that Deng quote, why not, methought. However, it’s become quite relevant in recent days as big shot pundits tend to lose over time … Hannity, James O’Keefe, Stew Peters … jury’s out on Tucker.

But even at a lower “reach” level, the red flags still appear … one giveaway is when someone starts talking about “my followers”. You wot? I’m not your follower, nor are any N.O. readers mine … you chaps and chapesses deign to drop in because you see some value in it … for now. We’re only as good as our material. In some cases, we’re part of your daily rounds or every few days. And what? Sounds good to me.

Building little empires? Forgeddit, chums, just the good oil please … that’s what we’re after.

c.  Sleep

I just can’t get this danged (Americanism) post written. I want to because so many are having really bad sleep issues up and down Britain (remember my NHS course I was on ?) but where does one start?

The moment I give any ideas how to fix it, every single other person can say his/her circumstances are different.

Yes … yes they are. Some have spouses there, others other circumstances … there are your surroundings, sheer noise, other worries … and so on and so on. 

I’d suggest the Holy Spirit was not called the Comforter for nothing, but who wants to know that these days?

Some people are naturally calm, others not, some are psychopaths who don’t care … therefore they sleep well … others are not, worry about this and that … fret.

You do see the probs. For me, the HS is the first major factor but is also a conscience triggerer, so … a double-edged sword.

I do like that advice I saw long ago about leaving your troubles at the bedroom door … your issues … sounds good to me. 

Then there’s arranging your periphery … your immediate surroundings … and anyone or anything interfering with those … deal with them.

There’s a certain degree of ruthlessness required … can’t be puddy-dats the whole time. Call it spine, backbone. To a point, otherwise it becomes ego and narcissism … or else the emternal power struggle.

Bloody govt trying to make our lives a misery. But one good antidote there is once you can finally accept thst these bstds truly are your enemy, out to depopulate … then it becomes far easier. I don’t fret over Gates, Soros, Schultz, Fauci, Whitty, Ferguson … they’re known-knowns … bullet to the head will sort those bstds … and it’s getting closer.

To a great extent, it’s mind over matter but it’s also diet, exercise, enough liquid, occupying your time too, not sitting about like couch porstoes …

… and so it goes on. Best thing I can say is don’t worry about it.  Easy for me to say, he who can arrange things as he wishes … well only to a point. I still have people around, neighbours etc, bleedin’ machinery a short distance away, all day and night.

But let’s say you do wake up in the middle of the night … so what? Is that the end of the world? Especially if retired and over a certain age … all the others will just have to adjust to that. 

I do have a vlog I put on which helps … it’s someone with a particular pitch and tone which puts me asleep, giving a lecture … I never hear it after ten minutes. Radio plays don’t do it as they’re interesting and often dramatic. Mood music doesn’t either in my case. Many clips are too short, I need 20 mins to be sure.

You have your own sleep help … sex is supposed to be good … but not with yourself, ha ha.

d.  Dogs

Toodles wrote something which struck home in my noggin:

“… am telling you people are NUTS about their dogs these days. They act like they are children. They are not people. I loved our dogs, but I knew they were dogs. The dogs knew they were dogs and liked it that way. They were happy dogs. They were aware we were the head honchos. We had fun and played with them but also had rules.”

“Everyone (fawns) over these k-9s like they were babies!”

e.  Birthdays

Yes, we’re right in my birthday belt … yesterday a friend from long ago had one, there are more up to the fifteenth, many celebs also have em around now … then comes Valentine’s.

I can assure you mine is not today, nor was it yesterday or tomorrow.  Some days still.

5.  MftWC too

a.  BRICS agenda and “Western Empire” agenda are the same agenda

https://expose-news.com/2024/02/09/brics-agenda-and-western-empire-agenda-are-the-same/

b.  EU Bends The Knee To Farmers: Drops Key Provisions In 2040 Climate Proposal

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/eu-bends-the-knee-to-farmers-drops-key-provisions-in-2040-climate-proposal/

c.  Assange, Elon, & The News Not Fit To Print

https://www.thelibertybeacon.com/assange-elon-the-news-not-fit-to-print/

d.  Ex-defense chief: Royal Navy warships are “unsatisfactory” and lack power to attack Houthis on land

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-08-royal-navy-warships-lack-power-attack-houthis.html

e.  Report: UK military would exhaust capabilities after just 2 of months of war

https://www.naturalnews.com/2024-02-08-uk-military-would-exhaust-capabilities-2months-war.html

4.  Tucker C

That’s a compromise designation in the light of IYE’s quote of a guy who detests Tucker C (NOWP 582:4), but without current specifics, as I mention. 

The guy might even be right but it’s necessary to give specific reasons why. There is such a thing as red pilling or as Clif High calls it … woo. Such a thing as finding the way, as I did, a Fabian in my youth. It takes a long time in many cases. Mine was around my early 30s.

Toodles for one, never trusted Tucker C and methinks there were quite a few specifics in the Fox days … how much him, how much Fox?  Is he a total charlatan, and is this whole thing staged?

Ian here wrote:

The Tucker Carlson Interview with Putin:

I've only watched part of this, but am impressed by Putin's candour.

I see the BBCs 'balanced reporting' makes no mention of this incredible interview. As far as the 'approved' UK media is concerned, it never happened!

Similarly Julian Assange - wasn't his appeal meant to be yesterday?

Are we expected to forget about him too?

https://tuckercarlson.com/the-vladimir-putin-interview/

Bottom line, for me (JH), is that however disingenuous Tucker C might be … out for himself like James O’Keefe … this most certainly got the message out we’ve been on about for years. I’m going to touch on this issue in the OpEd coming up, of pundits out for their own glory … or not.