[blog stats] too misleading to rely on

Seriously, I've given up trying to analyse stats. The most visited post [7 in each 100] was the Canadian one about Lynch. Yet at the time of writing, there were no comments. The last evolution post, predictably, was shunned and the railway embankment, garnering 9 comments, was visited by few.

Of course, that excludes the RSS readers. In other stats:

49.5% of visitors here use Firefox 1 and 1% use Firefox 3 [which I use];
60% use Java 1.5;
33% use a 1024x768 [I use 1680x1050];
75% use 32 bit;
92.6% use English but 3.2% speak French and 2.1% Spanish;
52% use WinXP and 18.6% MacOSX [which I use];
39% are U.K. and 35% U.S. but that’s reversed in the past 15 minutes;
In the last 100, there’ve been 51 separate entry pages;
I get 1.4 views per visit