[unwitting partners] we’re always the good guys, aren’t we

The importance of being right

In Russia, there was a particular father who had this unfortunate habit of concluding every third sentence with, ‘… am I right?’ This also went to show that people are the same the world over and that middle-aged men [and women], including me, are susceptible to this characteristic.

For us, the blog was invented, to pour it all out and to spare our partners an earbashing. Would that women would all blog as well and give us some peace and quiet 30% of the time.

By the way, there’s only one thing worse than an old pontificator, who at least knows something of the world … and that’s a young ponitificator. I still remember an eighteen year old mate of mine talking cars with my father and saying, ‘Well, you know, I’m not impressed by the Jensen Interceptor.’

My father replied with the equivalent of, ‘Who gives a f--- what you’re impressed with?’ He didn’t say those exact words because he never swore and taught me not to – that’s fraying a bit round the edges now.

That boy was little different to Mark Twain being impressed how much his father had learned between Twain’s 14th and 21st years.

Mr. White [a motif in itself] also said, in Quantum, ‘We have people everywhere,’ and concluded the remark with, ‘… am I right?’

Everyone likes to think he [and she]’s right. This personality quirk of yours, though annoying to us, is hardly as world shattering as, say, Gordo’s omnipotence.

When concepts don’t work

Svali, who incidentally said in 2000:

The good news is that if a person is debt-free, owes nothing to the government or credit debt, and can live self sufficiently, they may do better than others. I would invest in gold, not stocks, if I had the income. Gold will once again be the world standard, and dollars will be pretty useless.

… also said about Them, the ignorant Middletons, Balls, Millipedes, Obamas et al who corrode the cogs, nuts and bolts which help the world cough and splutter along:

Basically, they are in denial. They believe that history can be changed …

and:

They dominate the financial picture, have immense wealth, several mansions around the world, anything they want, and the (to them) joy of controlling millions of others. They believe their intellect is sharp, and that they will be the "good guys" in the New Order. They are Luciferians, and so believe the Bible is misguided in its assertions.

They believe that basically, they are GOOD and doing a good work, even if the means are tough to endure at the time. They are weeding out the weak and unfit, and developing a supreme human being. I know it sounds like hog wash, but they truly, honestly believe this at a core level.

If you think your humble blogger is ‘impressed’ with this woman, you’d be right, especially as it was said in an interview in 2000 … and look what’s happened since. Malcolm Fraser [former Australian PM] was in line with this thinking, smugly delivering to a suffering electorate [at the time]:

‘Life wasn’t meant to be easy.’

Look at Gordo and Harold Wilson, the pied pipers towards austerity. All part of the plan, comrades. The pound in your pocket – anyone remember that?

Agatha Christie, no less, wrote in ‘N or M’, 1941:

‘Incredible!’ said Tommy.

Grant shook his head.

‘You do not know the force of German propaganda. It appeals to something in man, some desire or lust for power. These people were ready to betray their country, not for money but in a kind of megalomaniacal pride in what they - they themselves - were going to achieve for that country. In every land it has always been the same. It is the Cult of Lucifer — Lucifer, Son of the Morning. Pride and a desire for personal glory.’

Now, you tell me how any of that is different to Gordo’s socialist world vision?

How is it any different to the principal speaker at the Oxford meeting of the Global Forum of Spiritual and Parliamentary Leaders On Human Survival [1988], co-sponsored by the Temple of Understanding and the UN Global Committee., James Lovelock, a Fellow of the Lindisfarne Association (a New Age group headquartered at the Cathedral), who authored the book The Ages of Gaia?

… on Earth she (Gaia) is the source of everlasting life and is alive now; she gave birth to humankind and we are part of her.

Lovelock wrote:

Orthodox Christianity, properly understood, is a distortion of the pure forms of religious truth … we must immediately return to the worship of the Earth goddess if we are to save ourselves from destruction.

Present there, nodding on and making speeches in support, was Maurice Strong, whose claims to fame include:

In 1992, [he was] chairman of the United Nation's Earth Summit in Rio de Janeiro He was co-chairman of the Council of the World Economic Forum, became a member of the World Commission on Environment and Development (the Brundtland Commission), found time to serve as president of the World Federation of United Nations Associations, on the executive committee of the Society for International Development, and as an advisor to the Rockefeller Foundation and the World Wildlife Fund. Above all, he served on the Commission on Global Governance. Friends include former Vice President Al Gore.

This is Them and here is their global vision, which Strong was heavily involved in promoting:

The purpose of the World Service Intergroup is to generate a focused, conscious and deliberate intergroup effort to specifically assist the Externalization of the Hierarchy and the Reappearance of the Christ.

I'm not making this up. I wish I were. And this does not refer to JC. From an article I can't find the link to:

Strong was at Findhorn, together with the Lucis Trust. Gordon Davidson and Corrine McLaughlin, who set up the WSI in Washington, D.C. in 1995 were also instrumental in setting up the Valdez Principles, committing corporate America to the Gorean Eco-principles now in vogue today. Here is the mindset:

The Shamballa force is in reality Life itself; and Life is a loving synthesis in action. We also used the Six Laws and Principles of the New Age to lead us towards creating a vision of how these principles might create patterns for the New Civilization humanity will be constructing over the next 2500 years.

The environmental movement therefore has an occult angle influencing it which sets it apart from the mindset of most people who see themselves as at least partly green. Shamballa force would seem to have little to do with recycling your bottles and using eco-friendly lamps and yet the connection is forced at high levels of society.

These people really believe they are the Good Guys. Black is White [Mr. White] and White is Black. Does anyone recall the biblical ‘woe to them who call white black and black white’ [or words to that effect]?

What socialism really entails

In 1990, Strong gave an interview to writer Daniel Wood [West Magazine], in which he discussed a novel he'd like to write:

'Each year,' he explains as background to the telling of the novel's plot, 'the World Economic Forum convenes in Davos, Switzerland. Over a thousand CEO'S, prime ministers, and leading academics gather in February to attend meetings and set economic agendas for the year ahead.'

With this as a setting, he then says, 'What if a small group of these world leaders were to form a secret society to bring about an economic collapse? It's February. They're all at Davos. These aren't terrorists. They're world leaders.'

'They have positioned themselves in the world's commodity and stock markets. They've engineered a panic, using their access to stock exchanges and computers and gold supplies. They jam the gears. They hire mercenaries who hold the rest of the world leaders at Davos as hostages. The markets can't close. The rich countries -' and Strong makes a slight motion with his fingers as if he were flicking a cigarette butt out the window.

Ravings of a loony? Maybe and there are many loonies, even in the blogosphere but the point is, this man is one of the Gorean ‘in-crowd’ of which Obama is a key member. In other words, the people coming out with these loony ideas are the people running things.

Look at the top in Britain and there he is in all his glory – El Gordo, with his global economic plan. If you’re an economic writer [I think here of Cityunslicker and Sackerson], you’d want to dissociate the ‘pure’ economics so beloved of you guys from the Shamballa guff but boys, you can’t separate it, not because I say so [and people have called me left field before] but because it really is the driving power behind Their actions.

Them.

You wouldn’t ignore inconvenient statistics, would you? You’d include all the stats. Ditto here. You need to weave the ravings of the people who actually run the show into your eco-view, at least to take the opposition into account.

Remember boys, these are the people who say capitalism and the free market have failed.

To my sweet, everyday, garden, socialist friends whose hearts are true

In Maurice Strong's April 8, 1997 speech introducing the Earth Charter to the UN, he said:

There is a need to address the fundamental ethical imperatives of sustainable development.

And what are these ethical imperatives?

Strong spoke of 'ethics of participation' . . . and 'ethics of inclusion' . . . in order to 'foster a healthy balance between quality of life and quality of environment — because development must henceforth be in balance with Mother Earth.' It will 'develop a sense of belonging to the universe.

There you go – tolerance, balance, the ethics of inclusion, love for humanity, multiculturalism where racism is anathema – all good stuff, eh? You’d subscribe to those values, socialists and left liberals, wouldn’t you? I hope Aaron’s reading this.

Of course you would, except that certain people at the top, Them, have hijacked the agenda and are pushing a very much unsustainable and bizarre policy which includes you, yourself, my socialist friends, who voted Nu Labour back last time and are now regretting it.

It’s not your fault but you can’t seem to see how the people at the top are manipulating your basic good will for completely other purposes.

Look at what motivates you. Look at what motivates my dear friend Cherie – care and compassion. Care for her members, care for the poor who can’t find a way on their own, respect and tolerance for humanity. Giving back to society.

Beautiful values.

You really are the Good People … except that you’ve been unwitting partners to the hijacking … and the agenda you think you’ve been supporting has actually been skewed and twisted into the shambolic Shamballa, at the higher echelons.

The fish rots at the head and always has.

You, my socialist and left liberal friends [and I mean good friends in many cases], are no different to the right of centre libertarians in that we all want prosperity and the right to a slice of the good life for our families. Yet we find ourselves on opposite sides of the political fence.

Why?

The simple fact is that the world does not owe us a living and even if it was altruistic enough to wish that, the resources don’t exist to implement such a panacea. Especially not when the resources are being skimmed off by Them.

If everyone felt the same and wanted to, rather than were compelled to , make personal sacrifices, as Lord T says, then people would not be as unemployed and living off the state which can't afford it, the current situation.

The nub of the matter

Look, I’m no wiser than you, considerably less so in many ways. Your world view you’ve sorted out in your mind has much to recommend it but if it does not include ALL the facts, including the inconvenient ones above, then it is flawed.

I’m not wise, I just report report these things as they happen, that’s all.