[bloodhounds] and the investigative obsession
![]() Just finished watching the 2007 version of Zodiac, the story of the serial killer who left cryptic clues in California in the late 60s. The story you can follow for yourself but the angle I'm interested in concerns the stages of an investigation and where it bottoms out. In the case of the Zodiac killer, the cop who leads the investigation obsesses and finally gives it away after compromising himself. The baton is taken up by a newspaper cartoonist, Robert Graysmith, who finds himself drawn further and further into the case, to the point where his knowledge of it is second to none but sadly, it is at a human cost:
Jim Garrison springs to mind too:
Ditto The Winslow Boy: Although the family has won the case at law and lifted the cloud over Ronnie, it has taken its toll on the rest. His father's physical health has deteriorated under the strain, as to some degree has the happiness of the Winslows' home. The costs of the suit and the publicity campaign have eaten up his older brother Dickie's Oxford tuition, and hence his chance at a career in the Civil Service, as well as Catherine's marriage settlement. Her fiancé John Watherstone has broken off the engagement in the face of opposition from his father ... There are common elements to all such investigations: 1. Something kicks it off and somewhere along the line, certain coincidences or certain evidence pops up which reveal that there really is truth in it after all. This is the trickiest part because it often occurs to one or two people and no one else can see it, having not been privy to how it cropped up; Serial perpetrators do this - they suck others into their agendas and it's near impossible to make that break with the case and not give the perpetrators the oxygen of publicity and obsession which they crave to mask their inadequacies. They even attract admirers and their ego now knows no bounds. There is only one piece of justice in this. Whilst the investigator, if he can stop early enough, can get back to some sort of normality and perspective, unfortunately, the perpetrator, though believing himself invincible, is actually being eaten up from within and he does come a cropper in the end, not from any final conviction nor public approbation ... but from within himself. More and more cases go on and on and on. Another example is Daniel Craig in Quantum of Solace. See what I mean? If you let it, it just goes on and on, branching into new territory like a river into new tributaries. Unless you stop it. Labels: bloodhound, investigation, obsession |










Thoughts on "[bloodhounds] and the investigative obsession"
-
James Higham says ... (08 January 2009 21:38) :
Add your thoughtsReaders, I apologize but I must switch off comments on this post, only because of the nature of the material.
This post speaks hypothetically and refers to both films and real life events which are dead and gone, e.g. JFK. It does not refer to any events people might like to surmise it does.
I really do not like switching off comments at any time but sometimes it has to be done.