[nice people] what's in a name

Beslan

I'll have to ask Germaine Lindsay for clarification:

These names - Bilal Abdulla, Mohammed Asha, Kafeel Ahmed, Hasib Hussain, Mohammad Sidique Khan, Shehzad Tanweer, Khalid Sheikh Mohammed, Mohamed Atta, Ayman al-Zawahiri, Khaled al-Harbi, Shamil Salmanovich Basayev, Osman Larussi, Yacine Benalia, Kamel Rabat Bouralha, Imam Samudra - they're all Jewish names, aren't they?

Or are they French? As we're assured by the MCB and a multitude of other organizations that all Muslims are peaceful people, then obviously the above names could not be Muslim.

I ask only for information.


"We killed too many," the Bali bomber laughed.


Last night I was reading quite a few articles on the Black Pope, currently Adolfo Nicolás, and about the Jesuits and all the naughtiness they're meant to have got up to. If all that were true [and Eric Jon Phelps does not seem the most reliable of writers, being almost obsessively anti-Jesuit], then where does that leave the Zionists? After that, where does that leave the Jihadis?

Seems to me that Phelps might well have part of the jigsaw right, Jones another, the anti-Zionists another and so on. It seems logical to me that any committed organization, be it the CIA or the Anglican church, is going to follow the same pattern.

At the "sheep level", e.g. the Masonic blue orders, things run fairly well according to the publicity and these are the people seconded to write it, in innocence and with conviction. As you move up the order, you're going to run into the more ambitious types, the more committed and the separation begins between the black and the white.

In any organization there are the genuine troopers and also the quislings who follow another agenda from above. Even Jesus once referred to the wheat and the tares. Thus you could have Donald Segretti doing his dirty tricks from the White House but something vastly more worrying in Anton le Vey at the CIA. I've read of quite a few "good" CIA men like Miles Copeland but I've also read of Scapitz and Ewen Cameron [who was convicted] and companies Sandoz and Eli Lilly.

In "Science Digest, April 1971", G.H. Estabrooks wrote an article called "Hypnosis Comes of Age". This led to far more than hypnosis, in fact DID and they knew this was beyond the CIA charter:

Following the conclusion of the general discussion, all technical apparatus was removed from the premises, and all participating personnel left the area. Checks were made and apparently indicated that the subject, although not having specific amnesia for the Artichoke treatment, nevertheless was completely confused and his memory was vague and faulty."

Now we're in an area where the middle echelons, hungry for success and advancement, are not above breaking people's identities apart and regressing them to incontinence, if it is going to earn them brownie points above. These are the Lieutenant Calleys, the Lynndie Englands, the oven stackers at Auschwitz, even von Stauffenberg in the early years. The really vicious pieces of work who seem to relish it are noted from above and certain overtures are made to them.

They advance.

So there are two distinct threads running through any organization - the career officers and the vicious. By the time you get to the very top - the Cheneys, Wolfowitzes, Kissingers, we're into the outward manifestation of the real power, alongside the career officers like the Eisenhowers who seem, to the world, to have the power but in fact are limited. The good are always marginalized at the top. To the world, they all seem part of the same team until things start to come out.

So, to say that, per se, The Masons, The CIA, The Jesuits, The Zionists and The Muslims are all bad is just not so - it's not borne out by the history of organizations. It's just that the bad element has got itself entrenched and the bile trickles down. That's why Lynddie England did what she did with impunity - it wasn't directly specified from above but by the very lack of consequences, of what she was given to understand, she saw that she could overstep the mark and it would hardly matter.

Ditto Calley.

Now there is no way you'll convince me that that did not trickle down from on high or else the middle echelons did what they did to please the brass. Where did the idea come from that they could set aside common decency and act like animals? And the higher and higher you go, the deeper and deeper you delve, the more it turns clandestine, the more it resembles Salon Kitty, with the high camp omnisexuality, bizarre grotesqueness, pleasure children and the whole shenanigans.

Somewhere along the line, this needs to be called true evil, in its practical manifestation.

There are no loyalties up there - percentage and pleasure are the only rules. The nature of the particular organization they're in gives their spiritual desolation a peculiar flavour, e.g. the Imams who call for jihad, meaning the extermination of women and children, who pervert Islam and the Islamic youth into false readings of the Koran, their thing is religious obsession, whereas the Cheneys are just into dissolution but at the highest levels, they're all serving the same master.

So, to return to the Muslim extremists, what they did was heinous and they deserve the hell they're going to but meanwhile, the truly guilty sit in the mosques and continue the bile. Amongst the Zionists, the kabbalists are the ones to watch, especially the masters of the lore. They're the true criminals who have always misused their power, throughout the ages, on poor humanity. Ditto the Druids. The 32nd degree Masons. The Archbishops, the Jimmy Swaggarts.

On and on it goes.

And who are they looking for to fill the key roles in education, the law, religion, medicine and the arts? "Talent", as Common Purpose and the Bilderbergers put it. Talent. Meaning the likely types who respond to promotion and perks and will walk over their grandmothers to get them. It's no accident that the whole fabric of society is white-anted, riddled through and through, the way it is. Go to any blog and read about it.

Solution? Tom Paine says:

Our problem is not with the leaders but with their clients; the state employees and the economically inactive who now (together) exceed thirty million. They would ensure that if you killed this mob, you would get one just as bad.

This thing runs right down through the society but in the end, it does all emanate from the head, from on top. A perfect example was Nixon's White House. with the head corrupt, there was virtually no chance for virtue below.

Solution? I don't know of any right now.