[changes] why do people ignore the evidence

We, all of us, myself included, have blockages in the brain which prevent us from seeing the bleedin’ obvious and drawing the obvious conclusions from it.

Outside my window now it is December 10th and this is the fSU. There is no snow, no ice, no cold. There are grey footpaths and in over a decade that has never been so. There has always been snow. Even were it to fall tomorrow and cover the land, it wouldn’t alter the fact that this is highly unusual. There are reports every few days of unusual weather around the earth.

I’ve looked at recent climate records and at reported cycles of cold and warm since the 17th century, for example and true, there have certainly been phases, within which a twelve year blip seems a relatively short time. It’s also bleedin’ obvious that there’re too many people today, pouring greenhouse gases into the air.

It’s also bleedin’ obvious that there is dirty work afoot. One, two, three, four, five, six, seven, eight, nine, ten, eleven. How great an effect overall the dirty work has on the earth and sky is a bone of contention, for all their evil intentions. It’s my contention that most readers have not even looked through a fraction of this material I’ve linked to here.

And while we're at it, what about the Rest-In_Peace Act, courtesy of Gavin?

Then some post on their blogs about these things, minus the information. This galls. Wilful ignorance is unforgivable. I have yet to see one refutation of this material and yet I have also yet to see one reference to it from anyone on his or her site. We, all of us, myself included, have blockages in the brain which prevent us from seeing the bleedin’ obvious and drawing the obvious conclusions from it.

I have questions; always I have questions. Why is it that a young man or woman goes into politics ambitious and idealistic but the higher they go, the more cynical and lying they become? From what source comes the sleaze? And why sleaze? Why not, say, altruism?

Why is the international ruling fraternity so enamoured of curbing rights, of removing humans from nature and felling trees, against the family unit and marriage, wishing to reduce us to serfs in compartmentalized, controlled villages; why are they hell bent on globalization and who would lead the world government anyway?

Why do they wish to modify the atmosphere and weather – for what purpose; why do they want to build a tower of babel to reach heaven? Why is there an intense, sustained move to inure us to all deviance – to atrocities which now barely raise a whimper, to teen sex and narcotics, to a land of unmarried mothers?

Why is street violence now the norm? Why do the courts support the perpetrator, rather than the victim? Why the move to fragment the UK and the US and then explain it away in historical terms? Why the build up of nuclear arsenals or the creation of them? Why the renewed focus on the Middle-East? What the hell are the US and its satellites doing there?

Why do I get the impression that the world leaders who instigate and enable all this are not so much part of a club but seem to be seeking approval from some sort of immensely powerful source [if you’re a humanist, you can call it the Finance but Woodrow Wilson and Churchill described it differently]? Why will this post be passed over and utterly ignored?

“There, there, James, you need to take your medicine, dear. Everything’s going to be all right.” [Aside] “He’s overwrought, poor man. End of year, you know and he so loves his snow. Let’s just wait until he posts a nicer piece on Icelandic ducks or something.”